Google+
Close

Bench Memos

NRO’s home for judicial news and analysis.

NYT Ignores Own Editorial



Text  



Today’s New York Times’ story on expert reaction to Judge Taylor’s NSA surveillance decision paints quite a diferent picture than the paper’s editorial.

Even legal experts who agreed with a federal judge’s conclusion on Thursday that a National Security Agency surveillance program is unlawful were distancing themselves from the decision’s reasoning and rhetoric yesterday.

They said the opinion overlooked important precedents, failed to engage the government’s major arguments, used circular reasoning, substituted passion for analysis and did not even offer the best reasons for its own conclusions.

Discomfort with the quality of the decision is almost universal, said Howard J. Bashman, a Pennsylvania lawyer whose Web log provides comprehensive and nonpartisan reports on legal developments.

“It does appear,” Mr. Bashman said, “that folks on all sides of the spectrum, both those who support it and those who oppose it, say the decision is not strongly grounded in legal authority.”



Text  


Subscribe to National Review