|
 he
event at the Kennedy Library in Boston was pretty heady historical
stuff. There at the Windsor Castle of
Camelot
were the two most illustrious survivors, brother Edward Kennedy
and daughter Caroline Kennedy. And what were they doing? Presenting
a medal. What kind of a medal? A Profiles in Courage Medal. What's
that all about? The medal derives from the title of the bestseller
by President John F. Kennedy. The book described acts of heroic
political courage by dead politicians, among them the senator who
voted not to convict impeached President Andrew Johnson,
thereby saving him from political doom, and the republic from happier
presidential prospects. Another was Robert Taft, who was honored
for his courage in standing by certain reservations about the Nuremberg
war-crimes procedures. The honoree on this occasion was, no less,
Gerald Ford. And for what act of courage? For pardoning Richard
Nixon.
The appearance by Sen. Kennedy at the presentation was remarkable,
not only because he did what he did, but because of the Shrum-free
rhetoric he used. Bob Shrum is the other James Carville in the fever
swamps of Democratic rhetoric, an endless deposit of spite, hyperbole,
and odium, an ever-normal granary for Democrats who want to feast
on the subject of Republican racism, fascism, hatred of the poor,
and defense of the rich and powerful.
Sen. Kennedy doesn't usually pass the doorman at night without a
Shrumload in his quiver, but from all reports, at the Kennedy Library
with President Ford at his side, Ted Kennedy was gracious, and even
repentant. He moved from the icy criticism of a pardon for Nixon
in 1974, to acclaiming it as an act of courage and statesmanship
in 2001. Sen. Kennedy said that Mr. Ford, by that pardon, had proved
that "politics can be a noble profession." He then spoke truly noble
words himself, because it cannot have been easy for him to say what
he did. "I was one of those who spoke out against his action then.
But time has a way of clarifying past events, and now we see that
President Ford was right. His courage and dedication to our country
made it possible for us to begin the process of healing and put
the tragedy of Watergate behind us."
The episode was especially moving inasmuch as forgiveness is not
in the Kennedy tradition. JFK was the author of the famous dictum,
"Don't get mad, get even." Sen. Kennedy has time and again been
moved to fidelity to that maxim. True, he has very little to fear
politically from Gerald Ford, who is not going to run again for
president. Nor was his reasoning entirely free from considerations
extrinsic to the medal being conferred. We would learn from an interview
by the New York Times's Adam Clymer what the rational narrative
was that brought Teddy to honor Ford for forgiving Nixon.
Kennedy had read a student essay on the subject, and it caused him
to think differently about the pardon because of the "whole impeachment
furor" over President Clinton, which absorbed government institutions
and "drove from political debate all national and international
concerns."
There is a problem, however. If you follow the reasoning here, Mr.
Kennedy seems to be saying that the impeachment of presidents should
not proceed because of their distracting effect on political institutions
and political debate. But manifestly there is a problem left over.
The Constitution provides a penalty for high crimes and misdemeanors
and it oughtn't to be thought obviously right to invalidate that
provision in the Constitution simply on the grounds that an impeachment
uses up a lot of time and attention. The best way to avoid impeachment,
obviously, is to avoid committing impeachable offenses. Mr. Kennedy
was not clamorous, in 1998, in calling to Mr. Clinton's attention
the consequences of his behavior, the lost opportunity for debate,
the distractions from the primary concerns of the republic.
Now all of this could have been avoided if Mr. Clinton, acknowledging
his offenses, had resigned his office — in the tradition of
British and French and Italians who tend to requite public offenses
by simply standing down. What other progression in events was possible?
Well, if Clinton had followed the Nixon sequence, a) Clinton would
have resigned, and b) President Gore would have pardoned him. There
might have been a large fuss by Republicans in protest against such
a pardon, but then after that died down, the Kennedy Library could
have given Mr. Gore its Profile in Courage award, and all the ends
of justice and charity would have been met.
But it was a nice intermediate moment for Sen. Kennedy.
|
