|
e
is the most famous economist alive, and to the regret of friends
of liberty and prosperity the most influential. Nearing age 93,
John Kenneth Galbraith is a little hard of hearing, and greets his visitor
with resignation. After all, what is shut out from his hearing is not
all that important, inasmuch as he has had the last word on everything
in the great span of years that took him from farmer's son in Ontario
to Ph.D. at Berkeley to journalism for Henry Luce to his professorship
at Harvard and king of the world in his profession.
"I have a new
book for you."
"Oh?"
"It is called
'The Essential Galbraith.'"
"Ah. Short book?"
He smiles defiantly
from the armchair he is now confined to. "Not so short."
It is a collection
of essays drawn from his huge lifework. He has written short editorial
introductions to each one of them. About "The Valid Image of the
Modern Economy," from the volume Annals of an Abiding Liberal,
he writes: "A more technical and in some respects more precise statement
of this theme was in my presidential address to the American Economic
Association in 1972. The latter, I am not quite alone in believing, is
the best short account of my general economic position."
That is the year 1972 in which Galbraith scaled the heights
of his profession, and the year in which he persuaded Senator George McGovern
to run for president of the United States. The two campaigns failed. George
McGovern won two states, and the socialism of John Kenneth Galbraith ran
into the real world which, with however many compromises, said No thanks,
and turned instead to Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.
At his old large house in Cambridge where with his learned and beautiful
wife he has lived lo these many years, he reflects on odd moments in his
career, and on an unbumpy way to affluence. "Did you get paid well
when you were a writer for Fortune magazine?" his visitor asked.
"Paid well! What was it, Kitty, twelve thousand dollars per year,
correct?" She nods. "That was a fortune in 1936."
He went then to Harvard where still in his 20s he drifted into a reception
for university trustees. "One of them gave me a drink order,"
he laughed. He was there when President Roosevelt appeared at the ceremonies
remarking the 300th anniversary of Harvard. "Joe Kennedy he
was the brightest of the Kennedys brighter even than Jack. Young
Joe knew that the great majority of Harvard graduates were in favor of
Landon for president, and that their ideological loyalty prevailed over
their judgment. So young Joe went around taking bets. He made enough money
from Landon loyalists to buy an automobile!"
Did Galbraith's colleague
Joseph Schumpeter also profit from journalism? "No. He was always
broke. And opinionated. You know, back then, anybody offered a job at
Harvard was really summoned to Harvard nobody else could
compete. Paul Samuelson's name came up for a professorship and Schumpeter
vetoed him. I talked to Samuelson and he said, 'You know, I wouldn't
have minded Schumpeter's blackballing me, because I'm a Jew.' Everybody
knew that Schumpeter was an anti-Semite. 'He blackballed me because he
knew I was smarter than he was.'"
Ah, prejudice. And
look now, he said, at the religious people in the Mideast.
His visitor objected
that religion was getting a bad rap. "You shouldn't condemn religion
because people profane religion by invoking it to serve evil ends, right?"
He affected not to hear, and chatted about his early years. He was the
eldest of four Galbraiths, and after draining the family resources to
go to college, undertook to finance the education of the younger siblings,
on his way to eminence. Prime Minister Trudeau, who ruled over Canada
for 15 years, superintending a drop in the Canadian dollar of 25 percent
of its value, told the world that his economic policies were based on
the work of John Kenneth Galbraith. "Do you know, my book on the
Great Crash sells more than all my other books combined? Whenever there
is a blip in the market, people say, 'I wonder what Galbraith had to say
about the Depression?'" He once told the visitor that he kept The
Great Crash at his bedside and when suffering from insomnia, reread
a chapter or two, closing his eyes finally with blissful gratitude. "That
son of a b-tch can really write!"
The old man is so
self-confident he doesn't, in his latest book, even bother to list the
titles of his other books. He deals that way with honorary degrees, stopping
to list them, in Who's Who, after twenty or so. "My only rule
in the matter is to have more honorary degrees than Arthur Schlesinger."
And his legacy? The introduction to one of his essays reads, "Thirty-five
years after [the original essay] was written years that have included
Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and now George W. Bush and Dick Cheney
Adam Smith remains undiminished in the scholarly eye and, as here
told, is by no means the exclusive possession of conservatives."
Nor is Galbraith venerated exclusively by liberals.
|