|
ngelo
M. Codevilla is one tough hombre, yet his prescriptions are mobilizing,
even for the weak-willed: There is muscle of the brain there. Not surprising,
inasmuch as Mr. Codevilla is a professor of international relations at
Boston University and a senior fellow of the Claremont Institute. It is
in the sparkling Claremont Review of Books that Mr. Codevilla analyzes
the war we are in, tells us why it is not achieving its purpose, and goes
on to tell us what, in his gritty opinion, needs to be done. The least
bellicose of which is "a declaration of war against the Assad regime
by the U.S., Israel, and Turkey." The good news is that such a move
would "most likely produce a palace coup in Damascus."
What we are doing now, he tells us in some detail, is wasting our time.
Our "War on Terrorism" has three parts: "'Homeland Security,'
more intelligence, and bringing al Qaeda to 'justice.'" About this
program, we are informed, "The first is impotent, counterproductive,
and silly. The second is impossible. The third is misconceived and is
a diversion from reality."
The reason that the homeland-security business is miscast is that the
goal of protecting us from the terrorists is simply impossible. There
are too many targets. An attempt to protect them a) will not succeed;
and b) will set into motion restrictions on the American Way of Life that
are themselves an objective of the enemy. It does not do, to countenance
the threat of being killed, to commit suicide.
Intelligence of the kind we have working for us in the drug world
the practice of integrating informers in the culture of the drug-importing
network is beyond our reach. The assignment is too broad, our resources
manifestly insufficient. We simply cannot produce a thousand Arab-speaking
spies who can integrate themselves unnoticed in the warrens of the enemy.
As we are proceeding, we are not targeting the procreative citadels of
the enemy. It is not so much Osama bin Laden we are after, as those who
permitted him to be strong and influential and, as a terrorist leader,
productive. Our enemy? "It's the Regime, Stupid."
The principal sponsors of the terrorists are not religious fanatics. "Palestine's
Yasser Arafat, Iraq's Saddam Hussein, and Syria's Assad family have made
themselves the icons of Islamism despite the fact that they are well-known
atheists who live un-Muslim lives and have persecuted unto death the Muslim
movements in their countries."
Yet Iraq, Syria, and the PLO are the effective causes of global terrorism.
"More than half of the world's terrorism since 1969, and nearly all
of it since the fall of the Soviet Union, has been conducted on behalf
of the policies of those three regimes. By comparison, Libya, Iran, and
Sudan have been minor players."
What to do?
Destroy those regimes.
"Killing these regimes would be relatively easy, would be a favor
to the peoples living under them, and is the only way to stop terrorism
among us."
We should most publicly proceed to the business at hand. "It is important
that U.S. forces invade Iraq with the stated objective of hanging Saddam
and whomever we judge to have been too close to him. Once those close
to him realize this is going to happen, and cannot be stopped, they will
kill one another."
Professor Codevilla summarizes the principal weaknesses of Western elites
who do our strategic thinking. The first is the superstition that violence
and killing do not settle anything. "In fact, they are the ultima
ratio, the decisive argument, on earth. Mankind's great questions are
decided by war. The battle of Salamis decided whether or not there would
be Greek civilization."
Secondly, we should know that attempts to appeal to moderation don't work,
and in fact, reach back to bite us. "'Extremist' is one of many pejorative
synonyms for 'loser.' The surest way to lose the support of 'moderates'
is to be ineffective. Might is mistaken for right everywhere but
especially in the Middle East."
Don't try to reach for "root causes of resentment against us."
It will get you nowhere. Just identify the regimes that foster or permit
terrorism, use our might against them decisively, and turn the targeted
countries back to the people who live there. In the course of things,
it is entirely possible that they would discover that a root cause of
legitimate discontent is the lack of freedom, political and material.
See The Claremont
Review of Books.
|