Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Campaign Spot

Election-driven news and views . . . by Jim Geraghty.


Print   |  Text
 

‘I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself.’

Has there ever been an American president who needed to clarify this point?

In an effort to energize Latino voters, President Obama defended his administration’s efforts to work for a comprehensive immigration plan, while adding that he was frustrated by the failures of Congress to deal with the issue.

In an interview with Eddie “Piolin” Sotelo, recorded when Obama was in Los Angeles last week, the president blamed Republicans for refusing to work on the needed legislation. As he has in the past, Obama noted that 11 Republican senators voted for immigration reform four years ago but walked away from the issue in this midterm-election year.

“The fact that we have not got it done is something that frustrates me, and I know that it frustrates many people in the community,” Obama said, according to a transcript of the show, “Piolin por la Mañana.” “The problem that we have is, is that until I can get some cooperation from the other side, then people who are anti-immigration reform can continue to block it.”

When Piolin asserted that it appeared that the Obama administration had worked less hard on immigration than  it had on other issues, such as healthcare, Obama disagreed.

“My cabinet has been working very hard on trying to get it done, but ultimately, I think somebody said the other day, I am president, I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself. We have a system of government that requires the Congress to work with the executive branch to make it happen. I’m committed to making it happen, but I’ve gotta have some partners to do it,” Obama said.

Pretty astounding rhetoric from a guy who has 59 Senate seats controlled by his party and 255 House seats.

Tags: Barack Obama

New on The Campaign Spot. . .


COMMENTS   4

EXPAND  

   10/25/10 15:38

Isn't it interesting that, from his perspective, Congress is required "to work with the executive branch", but apparently not the other way around? Is the executive branch not expected to "work with" (read "compromise with") Congress?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/10 15:52

Phil: I'm a god.
Rita: You're God?
Phil: I'm a god. I'm not *the* God... I don't think.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/10 16:17

"Glorious Leaders" are always bad news. Always. There are no exceptions to this rule.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 Jay
   10/25/10 17:51

"... I think somebody said the other day, I am president, I am not king."

That somebody was never been seen nor heard from again.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact