For the most part, the early voting numbers for Republicans are pretty darn good.
There are some who argue that because turnout for a presidential election year is different from a midterm election year, the better comparison is to 2006. But early voting has grown more popular cycle by cycle, from about 7 percent in 1994 to about 14 percent in 2002 to almost 20 percent in 2006 to 30 percent last year. In particular, Democrats put a lot more effort into early voting in 2008 and overcame a traditional GOP advantage in this area. So it’s hard to compare early voting to results more than one cycle back.
Either way, the current House of Representatives is shaped by the electorate that voted in 2008; a lot of House Democrats who were carried along by the Obama wave will not be returning in January 2011, so I think a comparison to 2008 is worthwhile.
All of the figures below are from the United States Elections Project at GMU as of this morning; it is important to remember we are discussing the registered party affiliation of early voters, not how they actually vote. Of course, most Republicans will vote for the GOP candidate, and most registered Democrats will vote for the Democrat.
Colorado: Early voting in 2008: 37.7 percent Democrat, 35.9% GOP, 26.4 percent independent.
Early voting so far in 2010: 36% Democrat, 41.7% GOP, 21.6 percent independent.
Some folks argued that’s disappointing for a surge. But I would note that Ken Buck and Michael Bennet are splitting the independents pretty evenly. This one will be close, but good GOP turnout is a good sign for Buck.
Florida: This is the amazing one. Early voting in 2008: 45.6 percent Democrat, 37.3 percent Republican, 17.1 percent independent.
Early voting in 2010: 33.7 percent Democrat, 52.8 percent Republican, 13.5 percent independent.
Perhaps all of the independents and Democrats are waiting until Election Day to vote. Or perhaps the traditionally GOP-leaning Sunshine State is about to go deep red this year.
Iowa: Here Democrats can celebrate the smallest drop-off. In 2008, early votes split 46.9 percent Democrat, 28.9 percent Republican, 24.2 percent other; so far this year, it is 45.5 percent Democrat, 38.1 percent Republican, 16.4 percent other.
Louisiana: Another huge swing. In 2008, the state’s early vote was 58 percent registered Democrats, 28.7 Republicans, and 13.3 percent other. This year, so far, it is 45.9 percent Democrat, 43.5 percent Republican, 10.6 percent other. African-Americans were 35.6 percent of early voters in 2008; this cycle, so far, they make up 20.2 percent.
(It’s worth noting that Louisiana has a lot of conservative voters who are registered Democrats.)
Maine: Another big surge for the GOP. In 2008, the early vote split 41.1 percent Democrat, 27.7 percent Republicans, 31.2 percent other. So far in 2010 it is 37.1 percent Democrats, 36.9 percent Republicans, 24.2 percent independent, 1.8 percent Green.
Maryland: Democrats probably don’t have to worry too much here. The state did not collect party ID on early voters in 2008, but so far this year it breaks down 63.8 percent Democrat, 27.4 percent Republican, 8.8 percent other. (Note: Maryland didn’t have “early voting” per se, but it had absentee voting, which some states count as “early votes.”)
Nevada: Clark and Washoe Counties break down their vote by party registration.
In 2008, Clark was 52 percent Democrat, 30.6 percent Republican, 17.4 percent other; in 2010, so far, it is 46 percent Democrat, 38.2 percent Republican, 15.9 percent other.
In 2008, Washoe was 47.1 percent Democrat, 35.3 percent Republican, 17.5 percent other; in 2010, so far, it is 40.2 percent Democrat, 45.9 percent Republican, 13.9 percent other.
Overall, NRO contributor Elizabeth Crum sees a GOP surge.
North Carolina: Barack Obama shocked the nation by winning North Carolina in 2008, and he was helped by an early vote that split 51.4 percent Democrat, 30.2 percent Republican, 18.5 percent none or other. This year, Democrats are seeing a drop-off: 44.6 percent Democrat, 38 percent Republican, 17.3 percent independent/none/other.
Ohio: With no easy-to-track statewide numbers, I’ll turn things over to Jon Keeling and the Cleveland Plain Dealer:
With a week until Election Day, the numbers of Republican absentee ballots cast in Cuyahoga and Hamilton counties are close to surpassing the numbers from 2008, a presidential year with generally a higher turnout. And in Franklin County, absentee ballots cast are running pretty close to even between voters of the major parties — 29,419 for Democrats to 28,506 for Republicans — after running more than 2-to-1 for Democrats in 2008. In the state’s largest three counties combined, Republicans have cast about 40 percent of the partisan absentee ballots compared to only 26 percent in 2008 . . . Democrats have explanations, but local Republicans have grins on their faces as they see GOP absentee ballots close to surging past 2008 levels in Cuyahoga County while Democrats have barely hit the halfway mark.
Pennsylvania: This state did not break down its early vote by partisan registration in 2008, but so far in 2010 — with only 49,756 votes so far — it is 56.4 percent Republican, 34.7 percent Democrat, and 6.2 percent Democrat.
West Virginia: The news isn’t all bad for Democrats. In 2008, it was 53 percent Democrat, 29.1 percent Republican, 9.1 percent other. In the state’s early voting period this year, it was 55 percent Democrat, 35.3 percent Republican, and 9.6 percent other. (Keep in mind that Obama lost the state by a wide margin in 2008, so plenty of West Virginia Democrats voted for John McCain.)
Now, all of the standard caveats apply: Early voting is still going on in most states, so the numbers may shift in the coming days. And standard Election Day get-out-the-vote efforts still count for a lot, as the Election Day vote will probably be 70-80 percent of the total. But Republicans can feel pretty good with what they’re seeing so far.
Jim,
In regards to Maryland: in September (primary), registered Democrats represented 61.39% of all eligible voters and cast 70.87% of all early votes; a +10 advantage compared to registration numbers. Republicans represented 28.90% of all eligible voters and cast 28.02% of all early votes; a +1 advantage. Now, if we go back our original numbers, we see Democrats turning out in early voting at +7 and Republicans at +1. If the September early voting has any predictive value at all, it actually shows that Democrats are turning out -3 less than you would expect.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDon't you have an intern who can use a spreadsheet to consolidate this stuff? figures, charts, graphs, . . . get into the 20th century (so those of us in the 21st can keep up) :)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAs Curley Joe used to say, "It's coitin's!" for the Dimmicrats. 2 points: in a lot of races there is a higher pecentage of democrats voting for the republican candidate than vice versa, and since there are mostly more democrats registered everywhere in absolute terms that comes out to a republican win. A lot of democrats are voting against Reid and his kid in Nevada and these numbers threaten a blowout. Second, there is also a problem in places like Maryland and California where functioning people who create jobs and vote republican have left the state for greener pastures in Texas or other Western states. But that just slowly makes the state bluer and more dysfunctional. Uh, California...need I say more? But this represents a new type of electoral challenge.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseP.S. looking at all these numbers, if I were a Democrat this year, the last thing I would want would be to have the electorate split between Repubs and Dimmicrats, and then stand there at the mercy of the Independents....good luck with that this year.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm with Ray! While there are probably some copyright and/or general "we don't want our name to be associated with some modified version of this" concerns, more downloadable spreadsheets would be great! The geeks among us could take what's given to us and/or tweak the numbers to see what would happen in various other scenarios.
If that's not a possibility, certainly a place where we could just view charts and graphs and tables and what not would be nice.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne thing to remember is that if you're a registered Democrat who's thinking of voting Republican in the fall, there are plenty of reasons you'd never change your registration before the election. If the GOP doesn't have any compelling primaries, as in Iowa, there's no real need to switch parties as a Democrat. Plenty of local races are decided on a single-party basis, making it a lot more important to be a Democrat there than for statewide races. And if you decided to vote Republican after your state's primaries, you're just as free to vote D as R in November. So don't be disheartened if a place with a lot of registered Dems are voting majority Democrat -- chances are, there are plenty of GOP votes hidden within.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFrom sunny FL: I wonder if some of the increase in Republican turnout is due to Independents switching to Republican back in the (Closed)Primary season so they could have a say in the Crist/Rubio, Scott/McCollum statewide races. Has the published voter registration for this state changed significantly?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne correction that I was told about yesterday is that PA does not have "early voting" at the voting booths. Those figures represent only absentee ballots. Still, Roll Call had an article last Wednesday indicating that, while Republicans had an advantage in the last 2 cycles in absentee voting, their advantage appears to be greater this election cycle.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSounds like good news to this Libertarian but don't these numbers need to be put into perspective. Meaning, how do these early turnouts relate to party registrations per state? What percentage of Democrats are actually going to vote for a Republican? Same for Independents? Right now there is 9-14% favor of likely voters voting Republican in the generic USA Today Gallup where Reps can get as many as 55% of the vote. Yet, if I recall correctly, the percentage of people calling themselves Reps is only 23% and Dems 35%. Gallup in 2009 had Republican and independent leaning Reps @ 41% and the same case for Dems @ 49%. The excitement level for the elections by Gallup today also had Reps @ 63% and Dems @ 37%.
My question is then, how do these numbers above all relate to early voter turnout? If Reps turn out earlier than in 2008, does that translate to the same outcome on voting day?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe numbers sound good, but I can't help but feel nervous about this election. Maybe it is the importance of this election in that it will in many ways decide the destiny of this country. I know that may sound melodramatic, but this is how I feel. About six months into the current reign of the Democrats, I developed this uneasy feeling, a cross between anxiety and a soft undercurrent of dread. It was an uneasiness about the direction and future of this great country of ours. As I see it, November 2nd will find us at the crossroads.
But it is not only the magnitude of the election that has me anxious. I fear all the electoral hobgoblins. The Chicago-style politics, the fraud, the tricks, the theft; the votes uncounted and those counted repeatedly.
You can call me crazy. Sometimes I am. But as some sixties poet said, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse