For those who wished to delegitimize the Tea Parties, decreeing them somehow responsible or the impetus for the horrific murders of a madman, mission accomplished. The new poll in the Washington Post:
The Tucson shootings sparked a broad public discussion about whether the political dialogue in the country has become too toxic and overheated. In the new poll, Americans are split evenly on the question of whether the tone could encourage violence, with about half saying it has not gone that far and the other half saying it could or already has.
Slim majorities say political commentators on the left and the right have crossed the line of acceptable rhetoric, and almost half say so of the tea party movement.
Separately, 52 percent of Americans now hold unfavorable views of the tea party, a new high. Nearly three-quarters of Democrats – including as many moderate and conservative as liberal members of the party – have negative views of the political movement, as do half of all independents.
The public is somewhat less severe in its evaluations of the rhetorical stands of the two major parties and their supporters, with 45 percent saying the GOP has crossed the line in how opponents are attacked and 39 percent saying that of the Democrats.
I have my doubts that these impressions will last long. The Tea Parties are a reaction to government overreach, unpopular policies, and difficult economic conditions. Coverage of the Tucson shootings will pass, and eventually there will be new outrageous examples of government overreach, and difficult economic conditions.
As usual, WaPo oversamples Dems. The breakdown in this poll is Dems + 10 (33% Dem, 23% GOP, 38% Ind).
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat poll is a crock. First, we just had an election that said the overwhelming majority of people who voted didn't want to follow Obama's lead. Oh, wait, the WaPo poll was of adults in general, not people who actually, you know, vote in elections. Second, their results contradict other polls, like the Gallup poll. More importantly, though, is that despite a truly impressive, coordinated attack on the right in general, and the Tea Party in particular, and using a skewed poll, they can only get to 52% unfavorable for the Tea Party? I think that before the election, their unfavorables were 50%. Democrats gave it their best shot, but the feces-flinging didn't work. At the same time, they revealed themselves to be truly despicable people who don't even blanch at dancing on someone's grave.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI had read that media attempts to discredit the Tea Party had been a dismal failure. Now apparently, they have not been. I am confused.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOf course this was a poll of "adults", so take it with a grain of salt relative to what matters (voters). Just about every 'scary' poll number for the right comes from such polls.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYou mean 52% of people believe tea partiers can't express their dissatisfaction with big government, over spending, the health care bill? Scary. That means we are screwed and that the majority do not believe in free speech or freedom of assembly as in the Constitution. I bet the "Poll" is propaganda and BS.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat's just a new high - the tea party has been discredited for a long time: THEY COULDN'T BEAT HARRY REID!!! The MOST unpopular democrat in the nation and the tea party failed. And now - that they're in congress - let's see if they can do anything but MAKE NOISE...
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse@Jonathon0815.
Doesn't matter. With 50% of independents (and rising?) disliking the Tea Party, it doesn't matter what the Dems polled think.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseTo SueDinNY: Nowhere in this article does it state that anybody thinks the Tea Party should not be allowed to speak. The article states 52% of Americans hold an unfavorable opinion of the Tea Party. This should be a concern to the Tea Party. People will come out to vote against something they don't like and which they fear could harm society.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse