There’s suddenly a lot more serious discussion of a possible presidential bid from Newt Gingrich, stemming from his full-throated attack on critics of ethanol while speaking at the Renewable Fuels Association Summit in Des Moines last week. The Wall Street Journal, Jonathan Adler, and OpenMarket.org take aim at Gingrich over it.
Audio of Gingrich’s speech can be found here. Here’s the portion of his remarks where he, in my humble opinion, opens the spigot on the industrial-strength demagoguery:
The other thing I find infuriating about the big city attacks is, this is one industry which brings high-paying jobs and highly skilled people back to rural America. There are now counties where the first or second largest taxpayer and employer in the county is in fact producing biofuels and I think that’s a good thing for rural America. It is great to have jobs that our young people can go to, so they can stay home if they want to, and have a good job, being productive, earning a good living, and doing something they find interesting.
I find it distressing sometimes when folks in big cities decide they will dictate on their terms, having ridden the mass transit down to the office that they walk to, that they will then decide what should happen to people in rural America. It usually means that people in rural America won’t do as well. It’s just plain fact.
Defend ethanol if you must — others at NRO have criticized it here, here, here and here — but don’t attribute the criticism to simple urban elitism or a desire to see rural Americans earn less money.
These remarks don’t necessary mean Newt Gingrich is certain to run for president. But he clearly wants to remain a viable option in the 2012 Republican Iowa caucuses, which means that at least for now, he’s more likely to run than not run.
I can't think of a worse candidate than Gingrich. Notwithstanding the fact that his personal life would make great fodder for the media (hypocrisy in fidelity and all), this ethanol obsession of his just shows how unserious he really is about the deficit.
Also, with 40% of our corn crop in ethanol production, coupled with crop failures in Russia and elsewhere, how can Gingrich say with a straight face that corn diverted for ethanol has no impact on food prices.
I'll say it again, those who self select for President are not going to be the one/s that we want.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNewt's career in elective politics ended the moment he resigned his House seat -- but he's the only one who doesn't know it.
Newt has only a slightly greater chance of becoming President than I do -- and that is only because I am not running.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNewt has as much chance of becoming president as my dog does - and I don't have a dog.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWould a President Gingrich allow us to the choice to not buy ethanol with our gasoline? How about the choice to buy potentially less expensive ethanol from Brazil? Make Iowa compete in a free and fair market for ethanol.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI find Newt Gingrich infuriating and distressing.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI can turn it around on Newt. His support of these mandates is akin to him wanting to impoverish urban Americans. Mandates inflate the price of corn and other crops (since supply of those other crops decreases as farmers shift acreage to corn) - that increases the price of almost all of the food I buy at the supermarket - and as an urban American, I have to buy my food. If I have to pay more for food, I am left with less money for other needs - or I have to cur back on food. So in order to insure that rural Americans maintain a high standard of living off inflated prices, Newt Gingrich wants to impoverish urban America.
If you think that statement is ridiculous, and you should, you should be dismissing Gingrich as a serious candidate immediately.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHis comments are pathetic and reek of the Democrats favorite strategy of class warfare. I guess he sat too close to Nancy on that bench. While I hate elitism, I don't think this ethanol question has anything to do with it being frowned upon. Ethanol has been used as payola in my opinion. And Newt continues the tradition of pandering to win votes in the Iowa caucus.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse