A reader in Tennessee forwards a mass e-mail from Chip Forrester, the chair of that state’s Democratic party . . .
Governor Haslam, please report to the principal’s office.
And bring your tea party friends, too.
Right now right wing extremists are pushing Wisconsin-style bills through the state legislature that would strip away the rights of teachers and eliminate their political freedom.
And they’re calling it “education reform” as if these bills were meant to improve student performance. The problem is: nothing in these proposals improves schools for Tennessee students. Nothing.
Make no mistake about it; this is a political attack on teachers for supporting democratic leaders who have stood up for education in our state. If passed, these fascist measures will silence the voice of teachers working to improve our schools, communities and our state.
Unsurprisingly, Forrester concludes the best way that Tennessee Democrats worried about the impending shift from a constitutionally limited democratic republic to fascism can respond is to give him money. (Somebody ought to send him this book.)
But, wait, that’s only the second-most-offensive comparison of the day!
“He has the power to stop this madness now,” House Democratic Caucus Chairman Mike Turner of Nashville said to loud shouts of approval at the teachers rally. “Governor Haslam, if you’re listening, please stop this terrorism against our teachers.”
Terrorism! (You know that a certain section of this crowd was, about three years ago, in the streets, marching and protesting that the Bush administration was overhyping the threat of terrorism and complaining that the term “war on terror” was too broad and imprecisely defined.)
I see elsewhere, “‘This is not about budgets. This is a political ballgame. They want to silence the votes of teachers,’ said Dennis Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association.”
Er . . . no. No one’s vote is being taken away from them. The best teachers will probably find themselves earning more as school districts compete to attract them with higher salaries, a phenomenon already seen in the state’s non-unionized school districts. But I suppose lousy teachers might be really reassured by a system that eliminates the possibility of merit pay.
Finally, a democrat found a terrorist.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe most amazing thing about this public sector union debate has been the way the Left has suddenly pulled out all the Hitler/fascism references. The Left is abuzz with talk about "Hitler busted unions, too!"... when all they have to do is look anywhere to see that yes, Hitler busted unions: the communist ones and the socialist ones that opposed him. It wasn't about busting unions, it was about eliminating opposition. Which only proves what Ayn Rand said, that socialism always devolves into a game of pressure groups fighting over the same scraps. We are seeing that right now.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseLooks like a duck, quakes like a duck, must be a duck.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCall it what you want, sticks and stones, we need to get rid of PUBLIC UNION bones.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnything that weakens a teachers union by definition helps education. PS It takes a fascist to know one.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI love when people outside of education throw terms around like, "...will make more money" and "merit pay".
Just look at all the Right-to-Work States and you'll find the poorest teachers in the country...some can't pay their education costs making under 30,000 a year.
Next look at "merit pay". Districts cry "poor" and instead of handing out a bonus for the best teachers they instead say, "Oh, and next year you'll need to take a 3% pay cut and higher deductible."
All the negatives on this site have clearly not been inside a school in decades and have no clue what the real job of teaching is like.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse