The first item in today’s Morning Jolt is a look at the administration’s perpetual “pivot to jobs….”
Pivoting: A Form of Rotation Similar to Tilting at a Windmill
Ben Smith of Politico contemplates the Obama administration’s perennial pivot: “Mike Allen’s note this morning that “Dems plan pivot to jobs” sounded awfully familiar to me, as it apparently did to the Republican National Committee, which promptly turned out a list of 15 occasions on which the White House had allegedly announced a similar pivot. That number is, shockingly, a bit inflated, but the underlying truth of the presidency is that through a mixture of choice — health care — and circumstance — the Arab Spring, the Japan earthquake — Obama has spent very little of his presidency publicly driving a conversation about jobs. By far the most serious jobs legislation he passes was the stimulus, but over-optimistic forecasts and implacable Republican opposition put the White House sharply on defense about it almost from the start. And the story of the Administration is, in no small part, one of a constant attempt to pivot formally to jobs. Emily and I identified what seem like six really attempts at it, with the seventh starting now…”
Keep in mind that inherent in the pivot-point talking point is an inherent excuse: the reason the administration hasn’t seen much success in bringing down the unemployment rate, or is perceived to be useless in bringing down the unemployment rate, or hasn’t communicated its message about its efforts, is always a lack of time and focus. I think most of us would argue the problem isn’t really an administrative attention deficit disorder or chronic focus on other issues; the problem is the policies stink.
Too much of the stimulus money got spent on crap. It allowed states to put off fiscal reckoning between runaway expenditures and vastly overestimated tax revenues. Trade deals have collected dust for years while Obama’s team tries to find ways to placate unions. Fancy regulation-reduction panels are announced while the Federal Register grows thicker and thicker. Obamacare adds a whole new complicating variable into employer health care plans.
“Alright, now we’re really going to pivot to jobs, just you wait and see” sounds like the oft-heard pledges of dieting and exercise and saving money and cleaning out the basement and flossing; the idea that all it’s going to take is a bit more attention to the problem and it’s going to be solved. I don’t doubt that a lot of folks in the White House are worried about the unemployment rate. I just don’t have any faith that they have any real ideas to improve the situation.
At Hot Air, Allahpundit notices, “His first move on the pivot will be a little disaster tourism to the midwest to see how everyone’s coping with chronic nine percent unemployment. And if all else fails, he’s sharpening up his buck-passing talking points for the election. From today’s White House availability: “Unfortunately, the debt ceiling crisis over the last month, I think, has had an unnecessary negative impact on the economy here, as well.” If he can figure out a way to blame the economy next year on the GOP driving a hard bargain on the debt ceiling this summer, I bet the left will be A-OK with the deal after all.”
It was unnecessary because Reid and Obama are both on record as playing politics with the debt ceiling in December 2010 by trying to pass the buck to Republicans.
A smart and hard-hitting candidate (likely to be Perry in a campaign run by Dave Carney who is not shy about such things) will nail them on that if they attempt to use the debt ceiling debate as an excuse.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThere is only one way to 'create' jobs in an economy where the GDP is 70% consumer purchases - more money in the hands of people who have a strong need to spend it immediately (as opposed to those without any such need, who are a drag on the economy because they don't spend any additional income in anything approaching an expeditious manner.
Now, in a better economic climate, that could simply be accomplished by eliminating federal income taxes for the bottom 90% of the population and absorbing the debt. In no economic climate since the triumphant political ascendancy of GREED in America, which won't diminish until the U.S. is a third world nation and reality once again becomes dominant in the American mind, will that be possible. In the current situation, it would mean that the top 1% would have to pay for an even larger percentage of government and government services for a few years; and that won't happen, even though it would mean only a return to pre-Reagan tax rates for them and even though it would mean that they would be securing their own successful futures instead of the complete economic collapse which is coming. Greed is ALWAYS nearsighted, with the added advantage of no peripheral vision, and the ideology of greed can never result in anything other than failure...but greed is nearly impossible to contain or to stop once it has taken hold of people's minds.
Say goodbye to American 'exceptionalism'. It had already disappeared when the 'exceptional' American people began to believe that common sense, rational thought, actual knowledge (as opposed to ideological BS) and RESPONSIBILITY to the community were inferior to the 'true belief' that genetic superiority over others is provided by wealth. And, after all, we're simply playing out the arrogance and idiocy of all of history's powerful societies as they collapse.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse