Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Campaign Spot

Election-driven news and views . . . by Jim Geraghty.


Print   |  Text
 

Lack of Energy Policy Kills Two Plant Proposals

Jobs saved, or created, or canceled.

News out of Wyoming:

Work on the High Plains Gasification-Advanced Technology Center, a much-anticipated $100 million research facility planned for Cheyenne, will be halted for at least a year and a half, University of Wyoming officials said Friday.

GE Energy, which has been working jointly with UW on the coal-gasification research center, delayed the project because of uncertainty about the future of U.S. energy policy, according to a UW media release.

GE has already delayed the project since the fall of 2010 because of a lack of a clear U.S. policy on climate and energy.

The facility, which would study advanced coal gasification technology for the Powder River Basin — a key economic driver to Wyoming’s economy — was scheduled to be completed by the end of 2012

Wyoming’s Republican Gov. Matt Mead puts the blame square on Washington: “Capital from the private sector only flows to large and ambitious projects when there is reasonable regulatory, legal and financial certainty. This is a real world example of the local impact of the federal government’s failure to provide a policy path forward for energy use in America. An energy policy must include the responsible use of our coal resources. Without a clear policy, investors and developers do not have certainty and cannot plan for risk, which is critical in making decisions to build modern, efficient plants… “America and Wyoming have the leadership capacity, the technology prowess and the private capital availability to wisely put our energy resources to productive use but we are strangled by uncertainty created by the energy policy vacuum in Washington.”

This comes after American Electric Power “shelved plans for a commercial-scale carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) project that was a centerpiece of the federal government’s so-called Clean Coal Initiative” in West Virginia.

The company says Congress’ inability to act on climate policy and a weak economy were left little incentive to go forward with the $668 million project.

AEP and French partner Alstom are already operating a pilot-scale CSS project at the Mountaineer coal plant in West Virginia. With $334 million in federal funding, they planned to expand the project in four phases to eventually capture the emissions from about 220 MW of the plant’s 1,300 MW capacity and store it deep underground…

So far, no commercial-scale CCS plants are in operation in the US, and the technology is beginning to look more and more economically unfeasible (like nuclear power).

The Department of Energy still has $612 million in Recovery Act funding designated for CCS projects in Louisiana, Texas and Illinois. And Southern Company is reportedly building CCS at a 582 MW gasified coal plant in Mississippi that will capture 65% of the emissions.

The American Electric Power plan got scrapped in mid-July and the Wyoming proposal’s delay was announced at the end of July. What possibly could have made these coal plant companies so nervous about what’s coming out of Washington?

Oh, that.

Power plant operators are nervously awaiting a new Environmental Protection Agency regulation, finalized last week, which requires more than 1,000 facilities, including more than 500 coal-fired plants, to meet stricter emissions standards so as not to pollute neighboring states. 

The regulation, called the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, calls for plants to install scrubbers to lower particulate emissions in states that are downwind…

The rule, one of a slew of EPA regulations directed at smokestack industries in the coming months, will impose huge costs on power plant operators, say industry representatives. 

“There are five or six other regulations coming down the pike that will have a huge impact on industry and on consumers and businesses, especially in parts of the country where we still have industrial manufacturing jobs,” said Jeffrey Holmstead , an expert in environmental strategies at the law firm of Bracewell and Giuliani.

The stimulus giveth the taxpayer money to create jobs; the regulations taketh away the financial feasibility.

Tags: Barack Obama, EPA, Stimulus

New on The Campaign Spot. . .


COMMENTS   5

EXPAND  

   08/04/11 10:13

This leftist outfit has a huge billboard on the parking garage across the street from AEP's corporate headquarters:

External Link 

I see a trend...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
SeanDMcG
   08/04/11 12:52

On the one hand, this is more proof that policies under the current administration probably do more harm than good.

On the other, any CCS project that gets shelved is not a bad thing in my eyes. Those projects seem to have been developed more in response to bad science than as a real fix for something. If there are benefits to these projects besides preventing the release of CO2, justifying the capital investment, I'd like to know about it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
DocInsight
   08/04/11 19:45

To me, this is what 35 years of lacking a national energy policy produces. That, and 20 years of bad "science" pretending to be "settled". No sane and reasonably informed person can deny the need to (and environmental benefit of) reducing SOx, NOx and Particulate Matter from coal-fired plants. Our air is cleaner due to the proper implementation of the Clean Air Act.

Nuclear power plants are expensive partially due to anti-nuclear activists and their endless litigation, which drives up costs to the end consumer - the rate payers.

Coal gasification would help reduce our importation of foreign sources of fuels and make better use of the coal than for electricity generation. Plus it would maintain the jobs in that industry - not a small consideration.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   08/04/11 20:27

Department
Of
Non
Energy

DONE

Apparently we have wasted all the money ever spent in the worthless energy dep't. since it got started. I'm shocked. Apparently you need to work at EPA if you really want to get things DONE in DC.

I am in agreement with Sean, the carbon project is most likely another boondoggle to start with.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
TexasMom2012
   08/05/11 12:19

If Obama wasn't such an ideologue he could reverse so many of his anti-job policies that the economy would pick up before the election; unfortunately for our country, he will never give up his Green fantasy.

Energy policy is one reason I want to see Perry run for President.

Perry/Bachman or Rubio or S. Martinez 2012

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact