Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Campaign Spot

Election-driven news and views . . . by Jim Geraghty.


Print   |  Text
 

Iowa: Newt Leads, Then Mitt, Then Ron Paul

According to Marist, 9 percent of Iowa caucusgoers listed their top choice as Herman Cain in their most recent survey. That’s a significant chunk that is now up for grabs.

Newt Gingrich leads at 26 percent, Mitt Romney is at 18 percent, and Ron Paul is just behind him at 17 percent. Rick Perry is also at 9 percent, and “undecided” is at 9 percent.

(Heh. If you listed Cain, Perry and Undecided together, you get “9-9-9.”)

Some had wondered if Iowa could be a springboard for Michele Bachmann or Rick Santorum, but right now, both are at 5 percent.

Could a bad performance in Iowa January 3 mean the end of one or both of their campaigns by January 4, and an endorsement some days later?

Jon Huntsman is at 2 percent, and his folks would be the first to tell you that they’re not putting much time or energy into Iowa, focusing on New Hampshire instead.

UPDATE: Hey, remember when this was the year that the Republican field was going to break away from pandering on ethanol? Remember how this year was going to be the year that fury over runaway spending was going to overtake the usual pandering to primary state constituencies?

Yeah, not so much. Recall from January of this year:

The former Speaker blew through Des Moines last Tuesday for the Renewable Fuels Association summit, and his keynote speech to the ethanol lobby was as pious a tribute to the fuel made from corn and tax dollars as we’ve ever heard. Mr. Gingrich explained that “the big-city attacks” on ethanol subsidies are really attempts to deny prosperity to rural America, adding that “Obviously big urban newspapers want to kill it because it’s working, and you wonder, ‘What are their values?’”

Tags: Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum

New on The Campaign Spot. . .


COMMENTS   3

EXPAND  

anonoped
   12/06/11 08:15

Your update needs an update. Ron Paul is calling for no ethanol subsidies. Ron Paul is calling for 1 Trillion in cuts.

Are you paying attention or are you living under a rock or are you just paying lip service to what is needed but in reality have no intention of diverting off of the wrong path American is going down?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
George B TX
   12/06/11 12:02

I strongly object to being forced to buy expensive corn ethanol with my gasoline here in the Dallas area while most rural consumers are free to buy just the gasoline. The reason is the EPA keeps moving the goal posts to keep my home area a non-attainment area for ground level ozone.

External Link 

On hot summer days when the wind quits blowing, usually in August, Dallas does have photochemical smog. However, the stupid corrupt EPA forces us to buy expensive corn ethanol all year long. In addition, our worthless congress is giving money we don't have to oil companies so they will blend a product nobody wants, expensive corn ethanol, into our gasoline.

External Link 

However, even with a $0.45/gallon tax credit, expensive corn ethanol is not price competitive with gasoline. If Iowa didn't have the power to cull the presidential primary herd, maybe the rest of us wouldn't be forced to buy their product mixed into our gasoline.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill Wilde
   12/06/11 18:10

Newt Grindgrinch is a lying, pandering, fool. His position on ethanol is but the latest proof. Cordially, Bill

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact