This is one of those moments where Newt Gingrich is either innovative and spectacularly ahead-of-the-curve or chasing his own intellectual curiosity at the expense of focusing at what is foremost in the minds of voters. If you’ve ever thought that the federal government needed a “Brain Science Initiative,” Newt’s your man.
Iowa City, IA – Following a meeting with doctors and researchers at the University of Iowa College of Public Health, Newt Gingrich outlined a new Brain Science Initiative that would improve the lives of millions of Americans while saving money and creating jobs.
The Brain Science Initiative builds upon Gingrich’s commitment in the 21st Century Contract with America to reform government in ways that maximize the speed and impact of medical breakthroughs.“Maximizing brain science breakthroughs can offer hope to millions of Americans impacted by Alzheimer’s, autism, Parkinson’s, traumatic brain injuries and more, while potentially saving trillions of dollars and creating thousands of new American jobs,” said Gingrich.
Gingrich pointed out that Alzheimer’s disease represents a $20 trillion combined public and private liability through 2050 and that postponing the onset of the disease by just 5 years could save $6 to $8 trillion.
“There is no single reform that could lower the cost of Medicare and Medicaid on the scale that breakthroughs in brain science could,” said Gingrich.
There are over five million Americans suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. Furthermore, Alzheimer’s doesn’t just affect the patient. Caregivers in Alzheimer’s families are twice as likely to have health problems from the stress of taking care of loved ones over a long period of time
.The Brain Science Initiative has four components:
1. A public-private research initiative to map the brain and maximize our understanding of how it works and what effects it.
2. A fundamentally reformed, 21st century Food and Drug Administration which has the mission of understanding emerging new science and accelerating its development from the laboratory to the patient.
3. The elimination of the capital gains tax so hundreds of billions of dollars in new investments pour into the United States, creating a generation of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates in founding and growing companies that deliver brain-related medical treatments worldwide.
4. Developing an integrated public-private partnership to use new technologies to minimize the stress of caregiving and maximize the potential for independent living for those with brain disorders.
This four part initiative will be developed in detail over the next few months in collaboration with brain scientists, doctors, dedicated institutions, and advocates.
It’s kind of the quintessential Gingrich statement, isn’t it? Big, unexpected, involving cutting-edge science, involving government and business working together (either a force multiplier to achieve a grand and worthy goal, or a formula for crony capitalism), a cost-effectiveness justification based upon future savings triggered on spending more now, and of course, details to come.
It sounds terrific at points – but is this something the country needs? Or can afford? Or that cannot be handled by the private sector and existing U.S. government research programs?
Between this initiative and that initiative, Congress will needs a new Cabinet position to just document them.
Gingrich, no thanks.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRight, in my opinion he could accomplish the same goal by reforming the FDA and eliminating the capital gains tax and forgetting any private/public partnerships. Just get the government out of the way, in this field and so many others.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSkepticism regarding BS initiatives is warranted.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think its a worthy cause. But it could probably be done better through a huge R&D credit and a huge X-Prize. Companies aren't doing R&D because the govt has taken over.
FWIW, alzheimers killed my dad. It killed him slowly. Newt is right about the cost. We should do everything we can to end it. The alzheimers association puts out $10 M per year. Its not enough.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAny one make the connection that PHRMA, among other groups in the pharmaceutical industry, have heavy interests in this field, as evinced by the already huge and rising prescriptions for "mental illness". Wasn't Gingrich a "paid consultant", or what every body else calls a lobbyist, for PHRMA..sorry way to coincidental for me
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAny candidate's current job is to keep on talking about the major questions -- government spending, employment, energy, immigration, and killing Obamacare, all of which are connected. These should take 90+% of his time and verbiage. "Brain science" and moon mining probably shouldn't make the remaining 10% except in closed sessions of the SFWA.
To bring up these rather arcane subjects now is like Isabella planning to fund Columbus before the Moors have been defeated. Our candidates should keep their eyes and thoughts on the big goals that will lead to winning the election, leaving these other matters for year three of their terms.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"--at the expense of focusing at what is foremost in the minds of voters."
One imagines that someone who is dealing with a family member or loved one suffering from Alzheimer's or the effects of a stroke has this subject foremost in their minds indeed. Gingrich is to be congratulated for once again thinking outside the box and in the long term. Finding a way to cure and treat ailments of the brain should be--er--a no brainer.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf he can find the funding by reducing waste and balance the budget... it could be a very good thing. Might have to put any future turtle tunnel plans on hold, although I'm sure they are already "shovel ready".
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAs a TBI sufferer (as a result of two documented violent head injuries) who started noticing adverse effects at the age of 27, I am of course very interested in this subject. I agree with Newt that this field should become a higher societal priority, but not so much a governmental one. Now, however, is not the time to push this. Certainly not as a major initiative for a presidential campaign run. I fear this is just Newt being Newt..."Look at me - big idea guy!"
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Brain Science" was a term used in the Progressive era of the 1920s an evokes some of the terrible progressive ideas such as eugenics. We should use a more neutral term like "Brain Medicine"
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse'You are made to REFUSE TO KNOW how perception-feeling-sensing works, including how perception-of-memories works, (in short, Perception - how that works).
Criminal Minds in religion and in science have "taken care" of imposing that REFUSAL to know, on you'
from: '(rev 3.4) How do Criminal Minds get in charge of the masses, of science, and of religion?'
Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher (and physicist)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDoes it not seem ironic thet would-be leader of the "small government is better" 2012 Republicans is promoting a huge government involvement in our brains? I'm all for curing Alzheimers, but I for one don't have a lot of faith in this group being in charge of it. Maybe they'll decide that Progressive "thinking" is just bad, probably they'll decide it "creates deficits" or is "job-killing..." Well, let's fix that too! I don't agree with conservatives on much, but I suspect most of the honest ones would feel the same way.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt's needed.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBut we also need Newt to learn what amygdala thinking is and start to do some mindfulness meditation in order to keep his primitive panic responses in check--the man operates from irrational fear much of the time, not his executive function. Newt, get thee some brain supplements, meditate, and simmer down re: the fear mongering!