Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Campaign Spot

Election-driven news and views . . . by Jim Geraghty.


Print   |  Text
 

I Suppose All Tall Massachusetts Men Look
Alike . . .

In the Washington Times, Charles Hurt writes:

Both Mr. Kerry and Mr. Romney look like they should be cast as president in a made-for-TV movie. But in reality, both are hopelessly out of touch, calculating wax figurines. They both even speak French! In the end, Mitt Romney is John Kerry without the war medals.

Oh, come on, that’s not true. For starters, Kerry doesn’t have his war decorations anymore, since he threw them away.

But I know John Kerry. John Kerry’s a blog target of mine. And Mitt Romney is no John Kerry.

David Harmer is a California lawyer who was the son of John Harmer, Ronald Reagan’s lieutenant governor. He had worked on the Hill for a while and then returned to private practice. Upon seeing Democrats controlling all of Washington, he decided to take on an entrenched Democrat in Congress, one who usually won comfortably. Harmer lost by 1.1 percent.

He wrote recently:

When I offered myself as a candidate for Congress last year, Mitt Romney easily could have taken a pass. There were plenty of excuses not to get involved: a contested primary, an uphill general-election battle, a union-supported incumbent, and all in a state that hadn’t voted Republican in a presidential election for 22 years. Instead, Governor Romney became one of my earliest and most influential supporters. He endorsed, he donated, and he urged his supporters to follow suit. His Free and Strong America PAC contributed the legal maximum. He sent an email blast on my behalf to all his donors in the western states. He promoted me on his website. He publicly recognized and encouraged me at his events. And he stuck with me not only through the election, but beyond.

Through his PAC, Mitt Romney has done a lot to elect conservatives, including plenty of Republicans a lot more conservative than he.

In 2010, Romney’s Free and Strong America PAC donated $5,000 each to the campaigns of Christine O’Donnell, Sharron Angle, Pat Toomey, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, and Jim DeMint. The PAC donated $5,125 to Marco Rubio.

On the House side, his PAC donated $5,000 to Sean Bielat in his bid to unseat Barney Frank in Massachusetts. Then $2,500 to Allen West of Florida, Sean Duffy of Wisconsin, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Tim Griffin of Arkansas, Doug Hoffman of New York, Daniel Webster’s bid to unseat Alan Grayson in Florida, Tim Scott in South Carolina, Bobby Schilling in Illinois, and dozens of other Tea Party favorites. The full list is here.

In the 2010 cycle, Romney’s PAC donated $639,304 to House Republican candidates and $159,995 to Senate Republican candidates. So far this cycle, it has donated $253,000 to House Republican candidates and $91,500 to Senate Republican candidates. In 2010, Romney’s PAC donated the maximum to 25 GOP candidates, and so far this cycle it donated the maximum to 120 candidates. The PAC donated the maximum to Michele Bachmann in the 2008 cycle and another $2,500 to her last cycle. He donated to Rick Perry’s reelection bid, too. In governor’s races, Romney-affiliated PACs donated “$62,000 to then-gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley in South Carolina and $30,000 to then-gubernatorial candidate Terry Branstad in Iowa.” Was that an obvious effort to build up goodwill in early primary states? Sure. But I’m sure Haley and Branstad appreciated the cash infusion in their competitive races all the same. So was the $6,800 to Chris Christie’s bid.

Mock him for his money and family wealth, but Romney has used that fundraising network to help put a lot of conservative freshmen into the House and Senate and governors’ mansions.

(By the way, in Hurt’s metaphor, if Romney is a repeat of an obvious mistake, what was the obvious right move for the Democrats of 2004? Would they have been better off nominating Howard Dean? John Edwards? Dick Gephardt? The irony is that Kerry may very well have been the most competitive candidate the Democrats could have nominated in 2004.)

By the way, you know who else spoke French? John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Quincy Adams, James Madison, and James Monroe.

Tags: John Kerry, Mitt Romney

New on The Campaign Spot. . .


COMMENTS   11

EXPAND  

Kim Hubbard
   01/03/12 11:42
 EBL
   01/03/12 11:52

Mitt Romney has his flaws, but he is definitely not John Kerry. Kerry is really really bad. It is fighting words to compare any Republican to John Kerry. Even Huntsman is better than Kerry.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/03/12 12:11

Charles Hurt is usually pretty good. He has gone overboard with some fashionable offerings.

Anyone should be able to recognize Kerry's vivid lack of private sector experience. Kerry has no genuine executive experience either.

Kerry never managed anything in his life that we know of, and even his attempt to run a Presidential campaign was dreadful.

Kerry has no serious economic ability either.

Romney is the opposite in every sense, a proven Free Market Executive who has actually turned around failure after failure.

Charles Hurt just lowered his credibility. His focus on image is laughable.

Even in the superficial realm, Romney and Kerry have little in common but their height.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/03/12 12:14

We all love to pick on John Kerry, in the grand tradition of mocking vanquished foes, but it's worth remembering Kerry came within about 100,000 votes of winning Ohio, and thus the presidency. And Kerry was facing an incumbent with a better economic picture than Romney would be facing if he gets the nomination. So if Romney is the unlovable-but-acceptable Kerry in this scenario, that's not the worst position to be in.

Does this mean Chris Christie, Mitch Daniels, Paul Ryan, et al are the Hillary Clinton and Al Gore of this cycle -- big names who might have had a good shot at beating a vulnerable incumbent, but for whatever reason decided to sit it out?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/03/12 12:23

"By the way, you know who else spoke French? John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Quincy Adams, James Madison and James Monroe."

So did both Roosevelts Teddy spoke French with a German accent and often mangled the grammar, but he had no trouble making himself understood in conversation, and even delivered a couple of speeches in the language - in the West Indies. Franklin was raised speaking French - and German - by European governesses.

Regards,

Joe

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 MTM
   01/03/12 12:27

Jim,

Fyi. Backing Perry's gubernatorial run is not conservative bona fides. Perry is a pretender to conservatism, and as such that does not help Romney's case. That is, if Perry were running for gov in Mass, he'd look know different than Romney did.

Not a big point; just an fyi.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/03/12 12:47

"Perry is a pretender to conservatism"? Tell me which candidate to you suppose is more conservative, and I'll show you that you don't have a real grasp of "conservatism".

Under the Reagan tradition, there are three branches of conservatism: social, national security, and fiscal. The fiscal wing is the "limited government" wing, and conflicts to a degree with the national security (because that costs money) and social (because it is invasive of liberty) wings. The compromise was traditionally on federalist grounds, with everyone acknowledging that national security was a necessary federal task, and social issues should be left to states where possible.

So how is Perry - who is undeniably the strongest 10th Amendment guy in the race (outside of Ron Paul) - not a Reagan conservative?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Tom O'Gorman
   01/03/12 14:40

"(By the way, in Hurt’s metaphor, if Romney is a repeat of an obvious mistake, what was the obvious right move for the Democrats of 2004? Would they have been better off nominating Howard Dean? John Edwards? Dick Gephardt? The irony is that Kerry may very well have been the most competitive candidate the Democrats could have nominated in 2004.)"

Bang on Jim. Kerry was a synonym for "pathetic loser" among Republicans after 2004. But for a guy with essentially the same liberal profile as Michael Dukakis, he got a hell of a lot of votes. He lost by about 5pc; he wasn't creamed. He certainly performed an awful lot better in a losing than John McCain, for example. So yes, Kerry was probably the best the Democrats could do that year.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
mlindroos
   01/03/12 17:04

> Kerry was probably the best
> the Democrats could do that year.

I disagree.
Kerry wasn't the only experienced-but-boring candidate. Dick Gephardt is as gray as they come, but unlike Jacques Kerry he was a working class guy from the Midwest (Missouri). And he used to be a blue dog Dem in the 1970s and 80s too. The Bushies privately told reporters they regarded Gephardt as their most difficult opponent.

MARCU$

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/03/12 15:58

Didn't Newt do most of this in 1993, without the personal fortune?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/03/12 17:49

Jim wrote: "The irony is that Kerry may very well have been the most competitive candidate the Democrats could have nominated in 2004.)"

It does not matter. 2012 is not 2004. It won't be a close election, whoever the Republican nominee is will win, and win big. It's 1980 all over again.

Whether Romney speaks French, Swahili, Esperanto or donated to James Traficant is all meaningless blather.

What matters is that we have a chance to nominate someone good in a no-lose election. To nominate Romney would be like nominating John Anderson in 1980. A wasted opportunity.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact