We Are All Occupiers Now.
If Romney’s opponents embrace the rhetoric and class warfare of the Occupy Wall Street crowd any closer, they’re going to start pooping on police cars.
So, here we are, at the day of the first primary, and the main objection to Mitt Romney from Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry is that he fired a bunch of people? More than his liberal-softie sounding rhetoric in 1994 and 2002? More than his crusade to liberate us from the individual mandate of Obamacare in order to leave the states free to enact their own individual mandates? More than the fact that he’s won exactly one general election in his life, in a year that the left-of-center vote was divided?
Objections to private-sector layoffs from the party that wants to shrink government? How do we think all of those employees of the federal bureaucracy will get off the payroll? Mass alien abductions?
When you think about it, isn’t it possible that the layoffs enacted when Romney was at Bain constitute one of the boldest moves of his career? One of the times he’s been willing to do something unpopular because he thought it was right, and in the long-term interest of the institution he was managing, instead of following the polls and telling people what they wanted to hear?
Much of the focus came upon Romney’s comment that he likes being able to fire people who provide services to him, if he’s not happy with the quality of the service.
You know, the way you can’t with the Department of Motor Vehicles, or the way you can’t (or at least not without Herculean determination) with a crappy teacher at a public school. The way you can’t fire a tenured professor at a state university, whether or not he gives good value for his salary and benefits to those who pay his salary (the students and the taxpayers). The way we can’t take our business to some other government, without leaving the country.
(I thought it was almost impossible to fire any federal government employee, but somehow Barack Obama is eliminating 80,000 U.S. Army jobs over the next ten years, from 570,000 to 490,000.)
“You like being able to fire people who provide subpar services? Well, don’t we all. In fact, there’s one guy in particular who I’m itching to fire in November,” quips Allahpundit at Hot Air. “In case you haven’t seen it elsewhere, here’s the outrageous outrage du jour, a Democratic attack so cheap and out-of-context that even lefty Greg Sargent felt obliged to defend Romney from it. The full, entirely unobjectionable quote: ‘I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. . . . You know, if someone doesn’t give me a good service, then I want to say, “I’m going to go get someone else to provide that service to me.”’ Surely, surely, only an especially desperate Democratic hack would stoop to twisting that. Right?”
Of course, Huntsman jumped on it. As did Perry. Then Newt.
“Dying to know if second place in NH goes to the guy who disdains me, or to the guy who latently disdains capitalism,” sighs VodkaPundit.
“They sound like a bunch of leftists. Listen to the rhetoric,” sighs Jedidiah Bila. She also quips, “McCain thinks SuperPACs are damaging the GOP field. I think most of the candidates are doing a good enough job of that themselves.”
Plus, I quote “Firefly” in response to Jon Huntsman lamenting the insanity of the modern GOP.
I am not a Romney supporter, but was a Perry supporter until this spate of capitalism bashing. Really disheartened me and turned me off.
I peeled off the Perry sticker.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI am confident that we will look back at this as the turning point in the Republican nomination process. Not as Gingrich, Perry, and Huntsman would hope, however. Romney was looking for a way to consolidate conservative support, and he just found it. It has become clear that Romney is the only candidate who understands how the economy works, and the only one who supports free market capitalism -- which is exactly what we must support to turn this economy around and create jobs. Romney may not tie up the nomination today, but this very moment is the turning point that makes his nomination inevitable.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf this strategy works, I'm not sure who looks worse; voters who allow resentment of those who have more than they do to control their decision-making process or politicians who encourage Americans to resent one another because it's politically expedient to do so.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExcellent article. Could not agree more. Conservatives need to stick with what makes us conservatives - freedom. Don't penalize those who get rich through the magnificent freedom this country offers.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think you should have led this post with the Firefly reference. Maybe titled it with the English translation of one of your phrases. Lot more fun than Romney bashing.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf Romney can’t take the Bain bashing now, what’s he going to do if he wins the nomination and gets hit by Obama and the Media on this very same issue? He better explain to the voters how groups like Bain make our economy stronger.
In the same vein, he needs to explain to voters why he has been squishy on Second Amendment rights.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI am absolutely shocked that so-called Republicans and even some of the commenters can't figure out what is so inherently wrong with the Bain attacks by other Republicans.
Is capitalism dead? Will Romney, if elected, even be given the chance to trim the workforce?
Heavens know Gingrich and others don't have what it takes. At least Romney knows how to make difficult cuts.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt is amazing how many of the estab would rather just have a truncated primary than one decided by the people. Romney started the bashing- of Newt in Iowa and has made his time at Bain the basis of his "I have a business acumen" campaign. Hence, it is fair game that his records be scrutinized. The problem with Romney is his insensitivity and that is what this debate is about..and please don't restate it for Romney as about capitalism. Romney has shown repeatedly that he is out of touch with many Americans and his cameleon ideology is nothing but a shame. When you carelessly use the word "fire people" when there is high unemployment, you show that you have poor judgment!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf Romney does not get the nomination because of this bludgeoning from the Republicans then we deserve another 4 more years of America's destruction!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIs Grindgrinch the OWS candidate now? Cordially, Bill
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI wonder how Thomas Sowell feels about his endorsement of Newt Gingrich, now that Newt has gone way left and attacked Romney with these ads that show a complete ignorance of free market economics. Gingrich and Perry have shown themselves to have all the integrity of John Edwards; but, one must sympathize with them, since they are both having to come to grips with the fact that they have failed, something that is extremely difficult for a large ego to accept.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePE firms are by nature highly extractive. Their executives aren't any smarter or more talented than others. The way firms pay the high returns they promise their investors is to buy portfolio companies, make some changes to put a gloss of turnaround on them, then lever them up with debt which is used to pay "special dividends" to the parent PE firm.
See the Simmons mattress company's treatment by T.H. Lee Partners for a simple example. Worked out great for TH Lee, not so great for the bondholders or employees of Simmons.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSpot on Mr. Gerahgty,
When I first heard the negative on Romney, I had to investigate as it sounded all too familiar: surgical cuts in phrases to promote a negative.
I am not a big fan of Mitt, but having heard his exact phrase, it was not out of the ordinary, being an owner of a small, growing business and having a decade of executive experience in a Fortune 500 company. Bad work ethics sink a business slowly, but do sink a business until the worker(s) are targeted and removed from the problem.
I pretty much can say that Gingrich is completely lost all faculties and should file for Chapter Moral Bankruptcy. Huntsman is a no player and I have no idea where Perry is coming from or going to these days.
I will leave Santorum alone as he did not kick the hive and reveal stupidity.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNewsweek said it a while back. "We're all Socialists now". It just a matter of degree.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGood article. Newt and Perry are going completely loopy here, criticising Romney for of all things being a successful capitalist and making money, and firing people that are not producing, how horrible. I think these 2 idiots just gave Romney the nomination. Newts attack is just as bad or worse than when he called the Ryan Plan repub social engineering. I had respected Newts ability to come up with good ideas, and phrase conservative thought in a comprehensible and inspiring manner, but this latest outrage has lost him my vote forever. And Perry, who used to speak up for tea party values, has reinforced himself as a complete idiot for joining in. Santorum could have gotten himself some points by defending Romney on Bain, but I suspect now that the only thing Santorum knows how to do well is pander to the socons.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is not accurate. Ron Paul hasn't participated in this wave of attacks on the free market. How come we avoid mentioning anything about that?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse