In the final Morning Jolt of the week . . .
One year from today, somebody will be taking the oath of office.
The Palmetto State Demolition Derby
Last debate before South Carolina . . . let it all out, fellas.
The debate started with a big bang: “Gingrich was in the hot seat from the start, as CNN’s John King asked him to respond to his second ex-wife’s explosive claim on ABC that he wanted an open marriage so he could keep seeing the woman who later became his third wife, Callista. Gingrich responded with an attack on the messenger. ‘I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that,’ said Gingrich, who dismissed the claims as ‘trash.’ The audience gave Gingrich a standing ovation as he called King’s opening question only two days before the election “as close to despicable as anything I could imagine.’”
I found a particular metaphor from Rick Santorum . . . an intriguing choice of words: “Former Sen. Rick Santorum played aggressor for much of the night, trying to inject himself into what seemed increasingly like a two-way race with little more than a day remaining until the South Carolina polls open on Saturday. He accused Gingrich and Romney of ‘playing footsies with the left’ when it came to health care. Both men rejected the allegations.”
I suppose Gingrich should be thankful Santorum didn’t accuse him of having “an open relationship with liberals like Nancy Pelosi” or some other awful not-so-subtle entendre.
Then there was this underwhelming response from Romney:
In a reflection of the complex political dynamics of the race, first Gingrich and then Santorum challenged Romney over his well-documented switch of position on abortion.
Once a supporter of a woman’s life to choose, he now says he is “pro-life.”
Gingrich didn’t exactly question Romney’s change in position, but he didn’t embrace it, either, saying, “He had an experience in a lab and became pro-life.”
Romney bristled. “I’m not questioned on character or integrity very often. I don’t feel like standing here for that.”
Governor, you’re running for president and hoping for the opportunity to carry the GOP banner against an incumbent Democrat. You’re going to be questioned on character or integrity every hour of every day until November. Get used to it, and get ready to counterpunch. Indignation isn’t going to count for much against the Axelrod attack machine.
Newt has admitted past mistakes and, as good Christians, we are told we must ignore his past infidelities when we vote. Mitt has admitted his past mistakes and, as good Christians, we are told we must remain suspicious of his pro-life commitment when we vote. Huh? It's particularly galling for Newt to question the sincerity of Mitt's pro-life conversion at the same time he chastises those who question whether he's still chasing skirts.
I'm reminded of a parable taught by Jesus (Matthew 18):
23 Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants.
24 And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents.
25 But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.
26 The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.
27 Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt.
28 But the same servant went out, and found one of his fellowservants, which owed him an hundred pence: and he laid hands on him, and took him by the throat, saying, Pay me that thou owest.
29 And his fellowservant fell down at his feet, and besought him, saying, Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.
30 And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he should pay the debt.
I left out the ending of the parable. In this case, the ending is up to the voters.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNewt has admitted some mistakes, but the Newt of past bad judgment and instability remains. Think back to why conservatives tried to dump Newt as Speaker.
The Republicans challenged Clinton on the budget in '95-96, entering into a game of chicken over government shutdown. His spine stiffened by Leon Panetta, Clinton wavered but held firm long enough for Newt to "chicken out." That, combined with the fiasco over the rear door of Air Force One allowed Clinton to overcome his reputation as a wimp, and he went on to win re-election in '96, something few considered possible a year earlier.
Thanks, Newt -- you handled that one really well.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBut of course Newt will just blow up at the media all year when they ask questions he doesn't like. Jim doesn't think that will ever get old.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse