Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Campaign Spot

Election-driven news and views . . . by Jim Geraghty.


Print   |  Text
 

A Golden Age for the Conservative Message?

An epic Morning Jolt today, with fliers paying more for gropes from the TSA, the Great CPAC 2012 Attire Controversy, the vice president lending his trademark sensitivity and tact to hosting our Chinese creditors, and this pep talk to readers succumbing to gloom . . .

Do We Need a Pep Talk? A Sign That All Is Not Lost?

Yesterday’s Jolt prompted “Blaknsam” to complete what I suspect is a long-brewing lament that on so many fronts, it feels like life is getting worse for so many. He begins with a trip to Barnes & Noble that showcases a selection of coarse, vulgar book titles that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago, and concludes:

Politically, culturally, socially . . . you name it, I feel like we’re under attack. The weapons being used are mockery, scorn, and condescension. It’s almost everywhere you turn: television, movies, music, newspapers, magazines (a recent issue of Newsweek ran a cover story called “Why Are Obama’s Critics So Dumb?” which was written by a man who insists that Sarah Palin’s son Trig was actually born to Bristol Palin), politics, the Internet.

Of course it’s not all bad. There are good movies, good TV shows, good songs. There are even some decent politicians. But the cumulative effect of fifteen or twenty years of scandal, war, depravity, terrorism, recession, and corruption . . . well, it’s enough to make a man want to stay in bed with the covers over his head.

I am blessed with a sizeable and (knocking on wood) loyal audience. I get a lot of e-mail, all day long. Some of it kind, some of it critical, the occasional nasty ones, and I probably complain about them too much. But in the past few years I’ve noticed an interesting trend in the kind ones. The tone is often, “You make me laugh as I read the news, and it’s the only way I can stand it.” “The news is often so depressing and bad, but somehow when I read what you write I feel like it’s going to be okay.”

That’s flattering, kind, and . . . a little unnerving in its responsibility. I’m starting to feel like the Tony Robbins for center-right news junkies.

“Seek, and ye shall find.” Whatever you look for, you tend to find; whatever you’re not looking for, you tend to miss. If you look for signs that we’re on the verge of cultural collapse, they will not be hard to find. But if you wish to see signs of life getting better, and an American or Western culture, still thriving and creative and churning, you can find that, too.

Off the top of my head:

·    They’re about to release a movie in which the U.S. Navy Seals are played by actual active-duty Navy Seals. How cool is that? No, really. Go watch the “Behind the Scenes” in which they’re filming on aircraft carriers and jumping out of airplanes and behind speeding boats. You thought “Top Gun” was an effective Naval recruitment film? This looks like the big-screen celebration of American military heroism we’ve been yearning to see for a long time.

·    The other night Adele won armfuls of Grammy awards, and is a simultaneous critical darling and huge bestseller (the longest-running number-one album in about 20 years). Her style is the old school, inspired by Etta James, Ella Fitzgerald, and Roberta Flack. She doesn’t look like a Barbie doll, and her signature hit, “Someone Like You,” doesn’t quite fit the narrative of our allegedly decadent times; it’s about loving someone when you can’t be with them, in a mature, accepting way, without bitterness or jealousy.

·    We may be entering a golden age of vocally Christian athletes who are, so far, the quintessential role models, with Tim Tebow and Jeremy Lin.

·    We’re a frenetic, hyper-caffeinated culture with no memory, no appreciation of what’s come before, no recognition of tradition . . . and yet one of the Oscar favorites is a tribute to silent film.

Okay, so even if there are bright spots in the arts, politics is a disaster . . .

Sociologist Richard Florida notes, “Even with the president’s approval rating showing signs of life and the Republicans busily bashing themselves over the head — ‘one is a practicing polygamist and he’s not even the Mormon,’ retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor recently quipped about her party’s two frontrunners — America continues to track right, according to polling data released by the Gallup Organization last week. Americans at this political moment are significantly more likely to identify as conservative than as liberal: conservatives outnumber liberals by nearly two to one. Forty percent identify as conservative, 36 percent as moderate, and 21 percent liberal.”

In the golden age of conservatism and American values – whenever that was – there were perhaps a handful of prominent conservative voices with significant followings and influence. Before talk radio, before the Internet, before the rise of alternative media, when the barriers to access to the world of mass media were much higher, it was a much more select club. This is not to take away from the accomplishments of the William F. Buckleys, the Bob Novaks, the R. Emmett Tyrells – they’re irreplaceable. But they have been followed by a not-so-small army of folks fighting the same fight in a thousand different ways.

Think about how many conservative voices you read, watch, or listen to today, large and small, regularly or irregularly. I’ll bet you can come up with dozens.

Columnists: Mark Steyn, Thomas Sowell, Ann Coulter, Walter Williams, Michelle Malkin, David Limbaugh, Charles Krauthammer, Robert Samuelson, Michael Barone, Cal Thomas, John Podhoretz, Byron York, David Freddoso, Mona Charen, Peggy Noonan, George Will, Andrea Peyser, S. E. Cupp, Andrea Tarantos, Paul Gigot, David Brooks, Steve Forbes, Bill Kristol, everybody else at the Weekly Standard, Pat Buchanan, Karl Rove, John Gizzi, Mark Tapscott, Deroy Murdock, James Pethokoukis, Phil Klein, James Lileks . . .

On the radio: Rush, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham, Hugh Hewitt, Neal Boortz, Mike Gallagher, Jerry Doyle, Lou Dobbs, Michael Medved, Bill Bennett, Lars Larson, John & Ken, Roger Hedgecock, Dennis Miller, Dennis Prager, Jay Severin, John Gibson, Brian Kilmeade, Ron Reagan, Cam Edwards, Michael Graham, Mary Katharine Ham . . .

On television: Bill O’Reilly, Dana Perino, Alex Castellanos, Mary Matalin, Liz Cheney, John McLaughlin, Greg Gutfeld (the whole RedEye crew), Dana Loesch, Jedediah Bila . . . shouldn’t we throw in Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee? Oliver North?

In the Internet and blogosphere: Glenn Reynolds, Erick Erickson, Moe Lane, Leon Wolf, and the gang at Red State, Ed Morrissey, Jazz Shaw, Allahpundit and the Hot Air gang, Andrew Breitbart, Katie Pavelich, Tucker Carlson and the whole Daily Caller gang, Conn Carroll, Robert Stacy McCain, Kurt Schlichter, Guy Benson, Jeff Goldstein and the guys at Protein Wisdom, Ace and the whole gang at Ace of Spades, the whole gang at Newsbusters, James Taranto, the whole gang at Commentary’s Contentions, Sean Trende, Jay Cost, Steve Eggleston, Kevin Bindersie, Patterico, Elizabeth Crum, Melissa Clouthier, the Anchoress, Mollie Hemingway and all of the contributors at Ricochet . . .

And this is all separate from NRO. It’s also separate from voices on the Right that don’t quite fit the above categories, pollsters like Scott Rasmussen, filmmakers like Stephen Bannon, novelists like Brad Thor, celebrity-activists like Patricia Heaton, Janine Turner, Stephen Baldwin . . . Actor-pundit Adam Baldwin . . . How would we classify a voice like Fred Thompson? Some time in radio, often on television, popping up online . . .

In these allegedly better days of the past, Frank J., Jim Treacher and Iowahawk didn’t get a platform to make us laugh.

Worst of all, I know I left off probably hundreds of folks with audiences across the country and world who I should have remembered. If Morning Jolt does nothing else . . . okay, that’s setting the bar too low. One of the things the Morning Jolt should do is introduce you to funny, insightful, enlightening and enjoyable voices you might not otherwise encounter.

(“So why didn’t you link to all of the names listed above?” Carpal-tunnel would set in, for starters. Google them, you’ll find what you’re looking for.)

Look, of course there are a lot of days where the news is bad. Greg Corombus and I have some days where we are so stuck for a “Good Martini” for the Three Martini Lunch that we start looking for out-of-the-margin-of-error poll swings. Our friends on the Left have spent the past thirty (Forty? Sixty? 100?) years waking up every morning and pushing the ball as far as they can in their direction. Some days they move the ball a lot, some days they move the ball a little or almost none at all. But you rarely hear them whining that it’s all too hard and that they’re quitting. They’re disturbingly patient and dedicated. They just get up every morning and keep pushing, confident that they’ll get the results they want, sooner or later.

Some days I think we could learn a lot from that.

The only problem with putting together lists like the ones above is that inevitably someone will write in, “How could you forget so-and-so?” and you’ll ask yourself, “Yeah, how did I forget so-and-so?”

Tags: Conservatism, Something Lighter

New on The Campaign Spot. . .


COMMENTS   25

EXPAND  

   02/15/12 10:28

Please can we agree that David Brooks at best belongs in a "part-time conservative" category?

And then we can add John Stossel.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/15/12 10:30
   02/16/12 12:07

And Theodore Dalrymple

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/16/12 08:07

Agreed. When you list Peggy Noonan and David Brooks as "conservative" voices, the two who adored and fawned all over Obama the last presidential cycle, it isn't hard to see why conservatives get depressed. I'll just assume that Ron Reagan thing was just a mistake.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/15/12 11:09

What is bad about this list is that (1) a list of similarly prominent voices on the Left would take up at least a decent sized pamphlet; and (2) many of those reach a wide audience that is looking for something other than liberal news commentary. Most of the conservatives are on programs/sites/publications whose audience is predominately people looking for a conservative perspective, or in a few cases they are providing "balance" to the predominately liberal perspective on their network or editorial page.

What is good about this list is that it is much longer than it was a few decades ago, and includes many sources of conservative views that are easily and cheaply accessible. When I was in college back in the late 1980's, getting conservative views either meant a trip to the library or a subscription to read NR or the handful of other conservative magazines, or there were the conservative writers on the newspaper editorial pages.

So it is now easy to get conservative views, but you still have to look for them. The Left still dominates everything that isn't explicitly conservative.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Stephen Poschmann
   02/15/12 12:47

Ron Reagan? Conservative? I think you meant Michael Reagan.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
samme
   02/15/12 16:39

Your premise is thoughtful but your logic is mistaken. This is NOT a golden time for Conservatives - not when so many of the so called conservatives are beating the drums for GOP candidates who cannot possibly win the general against our mutual enemy. That doesn't sound conservative to me and some you listed are down right biased and have religious bigotry.
I no longer consider myself a "conservative" because of this. NRO is shamelessly attacking Romney who is the only candidate that "O" and the dems are attacking. Make sense to you - not to me. It's very obvious that as Romney's poll # go down; "O"'s go up. That is not so w/any other GOPer.

Sad to say to day of unbiased journalism is gone. If that indicates a "golden time for conservatives" we are in real trouble. We can't promote a candidate simply because he talks like a preacher, when it's an business man which is needed to lead this government and nation. Do you hear any such talk from Paul Ryan; Chris Christy; Jeb Bush; Mitch Daniels, Mitt Romney; No because they acknowledge that election are political battles which must be won. Mitch Daniels said early on - "we will have to set the social agenda aside IF we want to win the election." "It's the economy which needs fixing." Stop dwelling on dogmatics and look at the reality of this nation's problems.
I am a Catholic but w/o blinders. I know that we need someone who has executive experience to lead us back from the brink of disaster. Someone who is NOT a DC insider.
A preacher/priest is not what is needed. We have plenty of those who are doing very well thank you. We need someone who can actually do the work of governing - w/o gumming up the works w/o attempts at forcing their religious beliefs upon others. That's not even Catholic. As Catholics we don't believe in coercion BUT conversion.

No, my friend, we are not in the "golden age of conservatism" (the latter word which PBXVI doesn't adhere to - not to "liberal"). Conservatism is a political division. And as such you all are certainly giving credence to the "politics" of that word by your attempt to force your particular brand of thought upon others. So what makes you different from liberals. Nothing at all. Except a label which I for one prefer not to wear. As I said I am a Catholic (R) and being so, means no labels. Catholic is not a label is it a faith belief.

So you and all your self-labelled "conservatives" - all of whom have varying degrees of actual faith and/or beliefs - quit patting yourselves on the back as you attempt to destroy our nation politically - which means the destruction of it's religious freedom and all other freedoms.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bond
   02/15/12 17:46

You forgot David Mamet

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Rob Crawford
   02/15/12 18:26

You should really mention Jeff at ProteinWisdom more. He's indispensable for understanding one of the root tactics used against us -- the corruption of language -- and deserves more credit than he gets.

And, yeah, thanks for the pep talk. With everyone screaming how everyone's "blown it", it helps for someone to say, "really? we have?"

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/17/12 21:33

I second this: Protein Wisdom presents some of the best-thought-out arguments on the web against Leftist thought and assumptions.

Jeff has taken a lot of grief for calling out fellow conservatives when they accept the assumptions of the Left in their own thinking, because nobody likes to hear that they've been gulled by the enemy, and they especially don't like to change lifelong thought processes.

But if we're to win back the Republic, it's not enough to beat the Left at the ballot box, we have to root out the false assumptions and outright lies that we've all unwittingly absorbed; otherwise, we're just running the lawn mower over the weeds instead of destroying them, and before we know it, the cute little flowers we've planted have been overwhelmed by the bindweed.

I'd highly recommend taking the time to learn Jeff's arguments concerning "Intentionalism" and the corrupt concepts of how language works that have poisoned public discourse and prevented us from speaking the truth. Orwell only got half of the argument right; Jeff gets the other half.

External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/15/12 19:10

Pep talks like this are needed frequently. It's particularly difficult to keep a positive outlook when so many of our own pundits are so relentlessly pessimistic about the Republican candidates. I've had to stop reading a lot of my go-to pundits because of this. Ronald Reagan himself could fly into the convention on a bald eagle to take the nomination and these guys would probably still tell us all the reasons he couldn't beat Obama and wish a new candidate would come to save us.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/15/12 20:19

It may help to remember that Ronald Reagan lost a couple of attempts at the GOP nomination because "he was too extremist to win." Or so said the Ford/Rockefeller types at the time.
Another thing to remember is that the presidential race, while important, will actually have less affect on the country in the long run that we can get by winning Congress and, this time, keeping it. That's where the purse strings are, folks! Barack Obama did not write the Obamacare bill; Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and their staffs did that.
So get out there and help elect conservative senators and congresspeople and governors. Help Scott Walker fend of the ludicrous recall. Stick with it, because the other side is not about to quit.
The future is ours if we go forth and take it. We're getting marvelous people like Rubio and Jindal in office. The future is bright if we keep up the good work.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/15/12 20:20

"They’re disturbingly patient and dedicated. They just get up every morning and keep pushing, confident that they’ll get the results they want, sooner or later.

Some days I think we could learn a lot from that."

Yes, but most conservatives I know don't WANT to get up every morning pushing the political process to meddle in the life of everyone else. They want to go to work, raise a family, live a life and not be bothered with all the BS.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/15/12 20:55

You should have named it "A Golden Age for Conservatives Preaching to the Choir."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/17/12 21:35

Actually, they're preaching to the converted.

"The choir" comprises disinterested parties.

</one-woman crusade against misuse of this idiom>

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mr. Mark
   02/15/12 22:03

The golden age of the conservative message?

More like the 11th hour, or the Eastern Empire.

But just think - now we get to be part of the counter-culture!

"Jean has a long mustache...wounds my heart with monotonous languor...broadsword calling danny-boy"

Thankfully, the new Stasi is likely to be headed by Janet Incompetano, so this will mainly be more disappointing than dangerous...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/15/12 22:05

To combine this with the later post about Democrats staying late to push the liberal agenda, conservatives have to be on their game 100% of the time, lest a slip lead to another statist attack on individual liberty. Vigilance flagged in 2006 and 2008 and we got Obamacare, etc. The Democrats/Leftists pick fights on so many fronts at one time so that the general public will get tired of the GOP/conservatives fighting back and the public ennui will let them get something through At some point, defense is not enough, the ideological battle needs to be brought to the other side's turf.

As Mr. Bohnet notes, conservatives have been too content with their niche success. We have successful think tanks, plus talk radio and one neutral news network, while the left owns newspapers, networks, Hollywood and Academia. Academia is probably impregnable for now. We still need to sort through how the newspaper model will evolve in the next decade. So it would be easiest to go for the soft persuaders. Have conservatives take control of a network by buying a controlling interest, set up magazines that traffic in mainstream culture, but from a conservative perspective. We're talking subtle messages. Not hammer people over the head stuff. Morning shows that celebrate virtuous behavior and small c conservative choices. Comedies that skewer PC-ness through satire not derision and have strong father figures who are more authoritative than mocked. Dramas where the wages of sin aren't rewarded but ultimately are punished. It would take quite a lot of drive to make it happen, but if regular americans know the virtues they prize are valued, not sources of mockery it could go a long way in strengthening them for the other fights.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
JeffB
   02/15/12 23:48

How could you forget... Rick Santelli!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/16/12 08:11

Noonan and Brooks were all in on Obama...I think we can quit calling them "conservative". And the Republican Party is about to nominate Romney, Mr Romneycare, after the wave that road them to victory in 2010 was started as an aftershock to Obamacare.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/16/12 08:12

In movies The Tree of Life has to be on the list. And even Midnight in Paris, which reveres artists of the past.
I second the comments about how our side pummels our candidates.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact