Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Campaign Spot

Election-driven news and views . . . by Jim Geraghty.


Print   |  Text
 

The Cost of Obama’s Gulf Oil Permit Slowdown

Yesterday, I reported on Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal pointing out that during a late winter of skyrocketing gasoline prices, the president who keeps taking credit for increased domestic oil production has actually slowed the approval of leases and permits in the Gulf of Mexico to a crawl.

A report by Greater New Orleans Inc., an organization of businesses large and small in Southeast Louisiana, lays out how the Obama administration is approving only a fraction of the new permits, significantly less than preceding administrations in both deepwater projects and shallow water projects, that getting approval from Obama’s Department of Interior takes much longer than before he took office, and how Obama’s administration rejects a much higher percentage of proposals for drilling than before he took office.

On October 12, 2010, the U.S. Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE, the renamed Minerals Management Service) announced  that the federal government would lift the drilling moratorium.

In addition to its Economic Impact Study, released after the Deepwater Drilling Moratorium was lifted, Greater New Orleans, Inc. continued  to monitor and report on deep and shallow water permit issuance through the Gulf Permit Index (GPI). GNO, Inc. researchers aggregate public data from BOEMRE into graphs.

The GPI documents that both deep-water and shallow-water permit issuance continue to lag the previous year’s average:

The three-year historical average had been seven deep-water permits issued per month; now the Obama administration has it down to two per month.

The three-year average for shallow-water drilling permits had been 14.7 per month; the Obama administration now has that down to 2.3 per month.

The average approval time has increased from an average of 60.6 days in the preceding five years to 109 days in 2011.

And more drilling plans are rejected than ever. The five-year average had been 73.4 percent approval; now it’s down to only 34 percent of drilling plans approved.

The economic impact of the permitting slowdown – what some call a “permit-atorium” – is not limited to the increase in prices from reduced production and supply. The study also found a direct economic impact in the Gulf region:

Despite the relatively limited employment losses reflected in public employment data, this study provides evidence that businesses are indeed laying off workers, reducing hours and salaries, and limiting new hires as a result of the permit slowdown and  insecurity about future markets in the Gulf of Mexico. Forty-nine (48% of all surveyed)  companies reported laying off workers. Sixty-five (65.6%) companies surveyed reported no hiring or only replacement of lost employees. Of the companies that did hire, numbers were generally low with only one company reporting hiring over 50 workers in the last year. Some businesses have been cutting costs by reducing employees’ hours and/or salaries. Thirty-eight companies reported reducing hours and salaries of employees, sometimes as much as 40% in order to avoid layoffs.

The current increase in domestic oil production is in spite of the Obama administration’s policies, not because of it. When the President and his appointees have the power to increase domestic production, they are dragging their heels and rejecting proposals when they can.

Tags: Barack Obama, Bobby Jindal, Oil

New on The Campaign Spot. . .


COMMENTS   4

EXPAND  

   02/28/12 14:28

Hmm Jim, I am trying to remember some event that occurred down there in the Gulf of Mexico that might have had an impact on the release of permits for petroleum extraction in US waters. I seem to remember this event had a significant impact on the economy of several Gulf Coast states. I know where I lived on the Florida Gulf Coast, the beaches were oiled and empty for most of 2010. While I am sure this permit slowdown does have an impact economically, so did the oil industries less than stellar precautions for a blowout that lasted 4 months. Lastly, even if all these wells were producing now, there would be negligible benefits to the cost of gas that is being experienced right now.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Josh Reiter
   02/28/12 16:32

Yea, that massive spill that somehow never really materialized into the huge environmental fallout that was predicted. Sure some splotches of oil washed up here and there but whole beaches weren't awash in oil like they were in the Ixtoc spill off the coast of Texas back in 1979. Besides if it was really that big a problem then why'd didn't the Obama administration let the Norwegians come in with the large oil skimming tanker to help contain the spill? Not to mention the oil well was caped in July 2010 but the number of permits issued didn't start to tick back up until a roughly a year later.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/28/12 20:59

Oh no, whiny, sarcastic leftist on the lose! Run to the hills.

The oil that washed up on the Florida beaches could have been picked up with tweezers. So your fantasy about oiled beaches is a lie.

There was a mass panic about the effects of the spill, but that's the fault of stupid people such as yourself inflating the magnitude of the accident.

The blowout was caused by terrible practices on the rig and a poor abandonment design, not a lack of ink on paper with the permitting process. But since Barry and Co are purely Governmental creatures, they think everything can be fixed with more government ink on paper.

Gas prices are based on oil prices. Oil prices are based on supply/demand, as well as the commodity aspect, and if traders think there will be higher/lower prices in the future. If the USA was doing the same thing as the rest of the world and looking and producing oil and gas where we could in our country, supply would go up, and that supply would not have the risk premium like oil from the Persian Gulf does. So USA oil has a double effect on holding down oil, and thus gasoline prices.

So you're wrong again, which is par for the course.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill Wilde
   02/28/12 14:33

Senator David Vitter is from Louisiana too. Why not take a walk down to the hoe house and ask him? Cordially, Bill

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact