Guess Who Called Obama’s Blago Statement ‘Obfuscation at Best and Prevarication at Worst’?

by Jim Geraghty

Noted Obama-basher Joe Conason:

This political problem arose in part because Obama was so eager to appear purer than any politician can actually be. In his initial statements, he sounded as if he was trying to say that he knew nothing at all about the selection of his successor. “I had no contact with the governor or his office and so we were not, I was not aware of what was happening,” he told the press, and refused to elaborate.

That remark clarified nothing; today it seems like obfuscation at best and prevarication at worst. Nobody is likely to believe that Emanuel spoke more than 20 times with Blagojevich or the governor’s aide John Harris without informing Obama about those conversations. To insist that he had “no contact” when his top aide was involved in so many contacts is precisely the kind of parsing that undermines confidence.

Conason adds “the facts are completely on Obama’s side.” Well, as far as we know, yes.

The Campaign Spot

Election-driven news and views . . . by Jim Geraghty.