|
![]() |
|
|
Islam and Dhimmitude returns to the major themes of her previous works, both complementing and greatly refining the analysis and documentation. The book's subtitle, "Where Civilizations Collide," reminds us its subject has never been more relevant. Since the cataclysmic events of September 11, 2001, and the start of the Afghan war, journalists and politicians have often spoken of a collision or war of civilizations, following Professor Samuel Huntington's hypothesis. Was that collision determined by the traditional relations between Islam and infidel non-Muslims? Both the historical roots of the question and the answer can be found in Bat Yeor's works. The philosopher Jacques Ellul wrote in the preface to her previous book that "the jihad is an institution, not an event." This new volume examines that "institution" and links it to dhimmitude, which also was to become institutionalized. This study covers a period of 14 centuries from the rise of Islam and through the resurgence of dhimmitude in contemporary conflicts, such as the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Palestinian intifadas. THE
SHARIA: ADOPTED OR ADAPTED? The chapters dealing with Islamic anti-Zionism detail this adaptation and clarify the present phase of the Arab-Israeli conflict. They elucidate both the theological foundations, and the adulterated rewriting of history that underpins the campaign of hatred and incrimination against Israel, Zionism, the Jews, and all those whom Islamism perceives as enemies. These chapters further establish how anti-Zionism and third-worldism have collaborated and are still collaborating, as well as examining the relationship between certain Christian and Islamic trends: "Christian antisemitism has denied to the Jews historic rights by the doctrine of the fallen deicide people. For Islam, this same refusal results from a historical negationism which Islamizes all Jewish and Christian biblical history." Curiously enough, certain Christians continue to espouse this doctrine, little understanding that they are shooting themselves in the foot: "neither the Vatican nor the World Council of Churches has officially condemned anti-Zionism as a criminal ideology advocating the elimination of the State of Israel. European policy is automatically pro-Arab, pro-Islamic, and consequently anti-Christian." Palestinianism is often an excuse for the politicized reevaluation of history. Thus, speaking to the United Nations General Assembly in 1974, Yasser Arafat described Ottoman Palestine in the late 19th century as a "verdant land," enjoying "freedom of worship" and populated by Arabs dynamically developing a culture which had existed over millennia. The accounts of contemporary travelers depict a very different reality: a neglected, semi-desert land dominated by "the desolation which the Turkish government maintains in the countries still under its rule" which is scarcely cultivated, inhabited by a "wretched" population, with "ruins everywhere." Palestianism often accepts myths as fact, using them as the foundation for political claims. WHAT
USE IS THE PAST? In a sense, Bat Yeor's book is eminently political. It explains the need to modernize Islam, and shows why the West must reevaluate the real dangers that confront it. Moreover, the author does not stop at exhortations but suggests concrete attitudes the United Nations should take within the framework of the existing non-governmental organizations in the interreligious dialogue a real program of action for the start of the millennium. The author concludes, however, on a pessimistic note: With the wave of anti-Zionist disinformation that has engulfed the media, she observes, "Europe seems to be remembering its past only to repeat it." Paul Giniewski, a French journalist and writer, is the author of 30 books (including translations), and a specialist on the Arab-Israeli conflict. His latest work examined Christian antijudaism (La Mutation: L'Antijudaïsme). |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||