|
![]() |
|
|
Whatever the case, a far more revealing insight into the former First Lady's mindset can be gleaned from her response to her husband's confession specifically, from the moment she decides to forgive him. She compares it to Nelson Mandela's decision, after decades in prison, to make peace with his white jailers: "'It was a challenge to forgive Bill,' she writes, 'but if Mandela could forgive, I would try.'" The comparison is obscene, of course, but it reflects a self-absorption so larger-than-life that, in a perverse way, it's almost comical: Yeah, there was a long line at Bloomingdale's last night, but I figured if Elie Wiesel could live through the Holocaust, I could survive the 15-minute wait. It is their self-absorption, more so even than their mendacity, that is the tragic flaw of the Clintons, herr und frau. It's what makes the prospect of Hillary's running for the presidency in 2008 so stomach-turning. MCDOUGAL'S
TALK It was Susan McDougal who refused to testify before the Starr Commission and wound up spending 21 months behind bars on the charge of civil contempt. She had nothing to hide, she claims in her book, but she refused to talk because she feared that her truthful statements would catch her up in a perjury trap Starr had laid for her, on the basis of false evidence provided by other witnesses. And if she were convicted of perjury, she might wind up in prison. In other words, she was so afraid of going to prison if she told the truth that she decided not to testify . . . and go to prison. The fact that McDougal is actually considered a heroine by many Clinton supporters, a paragon of personal integrity and a defiant role model, speaks volumes about the inability of folks on the political left to engage in if-then logical analysis. Her martyr status is, in the final analysis, her most damning testimony. Mark Goldblatt's novel, Africa Speaks, is available in paperback. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||