Taking It to Rome
A San Francisco battle makes its way to Rome.

By Stanley Kurtz, fellow, the Hudson Institute
March 26, 2001 9:55 a.m.

 

he battle to save the Saint Ignatius Institute, the University of San Francisco's renowned Great Books program, reached
Printer-Friendly
a turning point last Friday when the USF board of trustees voted 30 to 2 to support Father President Stephen A. Privett's planned reorganization — a reorganization that will surely deprive the Institute of its traditional Catholic character. Although the vote represents a serious defeat for friends of the Saint Ignatius Institute, all is not lost. A formal appeal has been made to the Holy Father in Rome, and on the outcome of that appeal, the fate of the Saint Ignatius Institute now rests.

By university charter, one third of the USF board of trustees must be Jesuits. And the Jesuits on the board, like their compatriot, Father President Privett, are long-time opponents of the Saint Ignatius Institute. With the liberal Jesuits on the board of trustees virtually assuring President Privett victory from the start, it was nearly impossible to build a pro-Institute coalition.

But USF is clearly reeling from the unexpected rebellion provoked by President Privett's attempt to deprive the Saint Ignatius Institute of its traditional Catholic spirit. Stung by a public statement in support of the Institute signed by illustrious scholars and public figures from around the nation, USF has hired a public-relations firm to put a more positive spin on media coverage. That won't be easy to do, since the wire services and Bay Area papers have already run stories highly unfavorable to Privett. And the bitterness on campus in the wake of Privett's move against the Saint Ignatius Institute runs deep. Institute students and alumni came out in force last Wednesday to protest Privett's decision to gut their program. That rarity of rarities — a conservative student demonstration — even included chants in Latin (Privett, Privett, Privett, quod fecisti non ius est: Privett, Privett, Privett, what you've done is not fair).

Knowing that the liberal Jesuits on the USF board would insure Privett's victory, it became clear that the only remaining way to save the program was a formal appeal to the Pope himself. That appeal was made in perfect accord with the canonical procedures of the Catholic Church and the Jesuit Order. The Holy Father is being asked to work with the leader of the Jesuits, Father General Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, S.J., to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict, so that USF may remain a place of genuine diversity, and so that the Saint Ignatius Institute can continue to exist in accordance with the principles of those who have made it such a success.

No doubt opponents of the Institute will complain that this appeal is an attempt to subject them to papal oppression. On the contrary, it is those seeking to deprive the Saint Ignatius Institute of its traditional Catholic character who are imposing their views upon others. We are talking about a program of 150 souls in an undergraduate student body of 7,000 — a mere two percent of the students at USF. The program is entirely voluntary, and students at the Institute can, and often do, take courses in Catholic theology from the liberal Jesuits at the larger university. If one small, voluntary program with an emphasis on traditional Catholic theology cannot exist at a nominally Catholic university, what has liberal education come to? If the Pope cannot protect so modest an outpost of tradition at a Catholic university, what can he do?

We shall soon see. The battle over the Saint Ignatius Institute will tell us much about the future role of religion in American higher education, and about the ability of the Catholic Church to maintain an even minimal presence for its own doctrines at Catholic universities. To be sure, American Catholicism is divided. Yet it seems entirely reasonable that both sides of that division have at least some sort of presence at American Catholic universities, particularly those that have made diversity an avowed goal. By the same token, America itself is culturally divided. Should not our universities grant a place to voices on both sides of our cultural divide? The Pope may have it within his power to grant or refuse the appeal from the Saint Ignatius Institute, but in the larger sense, the battle over the Institute represents an appeal to the American public as a whole to defend genuine diversity by returning some modicum of intellectual balance to higher education.

 
 

BACK TO NRO


 
 
shim
shim