 |
|
September
16, 2003, 12:40 p.m.
Terri Schiavos Life and Death
Time gained.
By Wesley J.
Smith
|
 |
eptember
11, 2003, was to be the beginning of the end for Terri Schindler Schiavo.
Last Thursday, a judge was scheduled to order the intentional dehydration
of the cognitively impaired Florida woman, at the request of her husband.
Mercifully, however, the law got in the way. (For more background on the
case, see
here.)
Judge George
W. Greer of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, in Clearwater, Florida, has repeatedly
made it clear that he intends to order Terri's death by dehydration; even
though her husband has refused to provide his wife any rehabilitation or
therapy for more than ten years; even though renowned doctors have sworn
under penalty of perjury that her condition can be improved with proper
medical intervention; even though the husband who wants her dead could benefit
financially and personally from her demise he plans to marry his
fiancé with whom he has begun having children, but he can't while
his wife is still living; even though Terri's blood family wants to care
for her the rest of her life; even though a guardian ad litem for
Terri recommended against the dehydration; even though Governor Jeb Bush
wrote a letter requesting him to reconsider.
In a tragic irony,
September 11 was supposed to be the death-ordering date. But St. Petersburg,
Florida attorney Pat Anderson, attorney for Terri's family, may have struck
legal gold in her and her clients' heroic struggle to save Terri's life.
She may have found a legal argument that should, at least for now, prevent
Terri's demise.
This is the gist
of Anderson's approach:
Ending a
patient's life by dehydration involves not one, but two, discreet acts:
(a) Act # 1 is removing/clamping off the feeding tube. Michael Schiavo
requested, and has received, the right to this act. Alas, due to "right
to die" advocacy, killing a person through intentional dehydration
because they are cognitively disabled is legal.
(b) Act # 2 involves the deliberate withholding of food and water by mouth.
Michael did not ask for the right to do this act.
The provision
of food and water by mouth is not a medical treatment but is humane care,
and thus cannot be withdrawn or withheld legally from a patient who can
assimilate nutrition and hydration.
A speech
pathologist, who has successfully weaned four cognitively disabled patients
off of feeding tubes in the last month, testified that Terri "has
a good or excellent prognosis for being able to be taken off her feeding
tube."
Under Florida
law, the right to rehabilitation is retained by the ward, and not delegated
to the guardian.
Under Florida
law, neither the guardian Michael nor the court Judge
Greer has the right to harm the ward;
Absent some
pre-incapacity expression by Terri to waive the basic right to food and
water and the right to rehabilitative therapy, the legal rights to them
must be honored and enforced. Testimony that she would not want to be
maintained by "tubes" would clearly not be enough since no tubes
would be involved in her care.
Terri has
not been given the opportunity to receive rehabilitation or to be weaned
off the feeding tube so that she can take food and water by mouth. Indeed,
Michael has required that she just lay in bed for more than ten years.
Hence, while
a Florida Court of Appeals ordered the removal of Terri's tube-feeding
an order with which Judge Greer seems eager to comply, it cannot be done
in such a way as to "harm" Terri, e.g. without giving her a
chance to survive by taking food and water by mouth.
Terri should be allowed
reasonable rehabilitation attempts before Judge Greer orders her dehydrated
to death. Refusing this clearly humane and merciful request would be to
intentionally cause Terri harm. Some might even argue that refusing Terri
any chance to live would be a non-voluntary euthanasia homicide.
Judge Greer may just
be listening. Rather than ordering the food tube immediately clamped as
had been widely anticipated, he has taken the matter under advisement.
Greer is expected to render his decision later this week.
If Pat Anderson's
motion is denied, I know she will appeal. And well she should. Her approach
is not a ploy to stall for time; it is a serious and credible legal argument
that deserves careful consideration. During any appeal, Terri's dehydration
should be put on hold until these crucial legal issues that affect each
and every cognitively disabled person on a feeding tube in Florida are
sorted out.
If Greer orders the
dehydration to proceed without giving Terri a chance to rehabilitate,
he will have demonstrated that he views her as a less than complete person.
In such case, Floridians should begin to ponder their legal and political
options against Judge Greer (recalling him or voting him out of office).
Now, about Governor
Jeb Bush: When I
recently wrote about Terri's case, I reported that Bush had received
more than 27,000 e-mails and other communications demanding that he intervene
to save Terri's life. I also reported that he had responded by writing
a letter to Judge Greer requesting that he appoint a guardian ad litem.
Gov. Bush meanwhile
has received up to 34,000 citizen communications. The governor, however,
has so far refused to do more than write a letter. He continues to refuse
his administration's formal intervention or make her a ward of the state
or even explain why Florida law prevents him from at least trying.
Fortunately, Judge
Greer's hesitation and Pat Anderson's advocacy give people concerned about
Schiavo's case more time to continue pressuring Governor Bush to stand
in the breach. Here's the 411:
Governor Jeb Bush
Florida Capitol Building, PL-05
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050
850-488-7146
850-487-2564 Fax
E-Mail: fl_governor@eog.state.fl.us
Wesley J. Smith is a senior fellow at the Discovery
Institute and an attorney and consultant for the International
Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. His revised and updated
Forced
Exit: The Slippery Slope From Assisted Suicide to Legalized Murder
was recently published by Spence
Publishing.
|