Can Riordan Still Win?
Can he overcome his campaign’s incompetence?

By Arnold Steinberg, a California political strategist
March 4, 2002 8:35 a.m.

 

an Richard Riordan still win Tuesday's Republican primary in California?

Riordan's opponents are Secretary of State Bill Jones and businessman Bill Simon. The winner faces the vulnerable incumbent, Democrat Gov. Gray Davis.

Gray Davis saw Riordan as his likely opponent. So Davis spent $6-$7 million on TV spots trashing Riordan. Davis wanted to weaken Riordan for November. Riordan could have withstood the attack if he had never cultivated a Republican base. He needed to tell conservatives he valued them. Instead, he confronted and insulted them. So, there were no wagons to circle him.

In fact, Riordan easily could have turned the Davis attacks to his advantage. In January, Riordan needed to enlist the RNC Chair, California Republican party chair, and his congressional endorsers. He needed third-party credible Republicans to imply it's a Davis-Riordan race. Riordan needed them to accuse Gray Davis of dirty tricks. Riordan could have gone on the offensive, with top Republicans attacking Davis for trying to pick his Republican opponent.

How did the Riordan campaign's incompetence affect Davis? He escalated his objective beyond weakening Riordan for November. Davis decided to defeat Riordan in March.

In another election for governor, George Christopher was the mayor of San Francisco. Democrat Gov. Edmund G. "Pat" Brown thought Christopher would be his strongest Republican opponent. Brown hoped novice candidate Ronald Reagan would win the 1966 Republican primary. Be careful what you hope for.

In this election, Riordan is the former mayor of Los Angeles. Democrat Gov. Gray Davis thought Riordan would be his strongest Republican opponent. Davis hoped novice candidate Bill Simon would win this 2002 Republican primary.

In 1990, Dianne Feinstein was the former mayor of San Francisco. She ran for governor in the Democrat primary. Opponent John van Kamp was widely expected to win the primary. What happened? Feinstein's signature TV spot made history by single-handedly electing her. It opened with her dramatic reaction to the assassination of SF County Supervisor Harvey Milk. (Feinstein won the primary, but lost in November to U.S. Senator Pete Wilson, who became governor.)

This year, Bill Simon's signature Rudy spot put Simon on the map. Without 9/11, there would have been no Rudy factor for Simon. The Rudy spot produced immediate poll gains, but Simon still hesitated to buy more TV time. Then, the Davis attack ads increased Riordan's negatives. Simon incurred no backlash, since Davis (not Simon) attacked Riordan.

Meanwhile, Riordan continued to alienate Republicans. The Sacramento Bee's Dan Walters wrote that "Richard Riordan's public disdain for conservatives coalesced support for the neophyte politician" (Simon). Anyway, Simon finally was dragged kicking and screaming into increasing his ad buy. He even criticized Riordan on issues.

Riordan is behind in all private tracking polls, including his own. But he pulled out all the stops. "After trying to be Mr. Goody-Good Shoes," Riordan says of Simon, " he started to paint me as things I'm not." Riordan even attacked Simon for his inherited wealth.

Simon barely established his ID and image. So, as the new kid on the block, he could have been taken down...earlier. Riordan's cocky campaign "strategists" never did opposition research on Simon. Newspapers revealed that SKS-Simon, a joint venture of Simon and a developer, gave $95,000 to a campaign to reelect Willie Brown. Imagine if Riordan's inept campaign had attacked Simon weeks ago.

The Riordan ads are late. Simon now gets mountains of favorable press. Simon's the story and acts like a winner. But Simon faces new scrutiny and much more if he wins tomorrow.

Riordan acts like a loser. Riordan says he has lost all respect for Simon and on Friday called him an "ultra-ultra conservative" and a "sanctimonious hypocrite" who wears his "religion on his lapel." Riordan also said Simon is "just too extreme to be elected governor."

Tortoise Bill Jones could have exploited the Riordan-Simon negativity to win. But Jones "targeted" his TV buy. Translation: He has no money. He bought time only last week, and in small media markets, only limited cable in Los Angeles and Bay area media markets. He sent some mailings, rarely a factor in a statewide race. Without $2 million for TV, Jones is not a factor.

Will Jones take enough votes from Simon to give Riordan victory? Probably not. it's more likely that Simon could win big tomorrow.

Besides, what would a limited Riordan plurality mean? The Jones and Simon vote is anti-Riordan. Thus, Riordan would be in deep trouble for November.

In contrast, a Simon plurality Tuesday is negotiable. The Riordan and Jones vote is not anti-Simon. But would winner Simon realize that he, in fact, did not win, but Riordan lost?

Only knowing that truth, can Simon mount a serious effort against Davis.

 
 

BACK TO NRO


 
 
shim
shim