|
o
much for a rigorous review of the policy and other failures that contributed
to the U.S. intelligence community's inability to detect and prevent the
deadly attacks of September 11. No sooner had members of the House and
Senate intelligence committees decided that these problems required a
comprehensive review a review that would almost certainly implicate
CIA Director George Tenet for his role in implementing defective policies,
if not in every case initiating them than they turned over its
conduct to one of Tenet's most trusted subordinates: L. Britt Snyder.
This personnel decision sets the stage for a whitewash of epic proportions
as if Sen. Sam Ervin had hired John Erlichman to run the Watergate
investigation or Ken Lay's general counsel were tapped to run all the
congressional investigations into the Enron debacle.
These invidious comparisons are hardly exaggerations. Britt Snyder was,
until last year, the inspector general of the Tenet CIA. From 1997-98
he served as special counsel and adviser to Tenet. From 1989 to 1992,
he was general counsel of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
when Tenet was its staff director. It is hard to imagine how such an individual
could bring the sort of independence and objectivity to the task that
the committee so clearly requires.
It is, moreover, unclear at this writing whether Snyder will be allowed
to hire the rest of the staff charged with conducting this investigation.
If so, it is entirely possible that none of those retained will be able
or willing to find fault with the intelligence community's past direction,
priorities, or conduct let alone that of the elected and appointed
officials whose political and policy proclivities appear to have contributed
to the Sept. 11 failure.
If the House and Senate intelligence committees are determined to give
a complete pass to George Tenet and the direction he gave the community
over the past five years, they might as well spare the taxpayer the expense
of going through the motions of an investigation. If, on the other hand,
they really do want to learn and apply the lessons of Sept. 11, they would
be well advised to secure the services of those who have at least as much
expertise in the field of intelligence as Snyder, but not his disabling
baggage of past institutional and personal loyalties.
|