![]() |
|
Mission:
Incomplete November 8, 2001 12:15 p.m. |
|
|
|
Whether he's doing this to keep Arab oil flowing to the U.S., to include Arab and Muslim nations in the antiterrorism coalition, to show widespread opposition to the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, or for whatever reason the fact is that these regimes are not reliable allies. Some are sworn enemies. Virtually all of them are breeding grounds for terrorists. Conversely, Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, and America's staunchest friend in the region. President Bush knows America and Israel have a special relationship. When he was seeking the presidency last year, he gave an important speech on May 22, 2000, to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Conference. He said, in part:
Clearly suggesting that his approach to Israel would differ from Bill Clinton's heavy-handedness, in which Clinton exerted great pressure on Israel to bend to the demands of the Palestinians in reaching a legacy-building peace deal, Bush also said:
And he didn't stop there. Knowing full well that moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem would infuriate the Palestinians, as they claim part of that city as their own, Bush nonetheless said:
A mere 15 days after taking office, Bush broke his word. On ABC's news program This Week, his secretary of state, Colin Powell, said that there were no immediate plans to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv, but the new administration was "studying it." On CNN's Late Edition, Bush's national-security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, repeated Powell's assertion:
And during his presidency, while scores of Israelis including an Israeli cabinet minister have been murdered by Palestinian terrorists, Bush and his advisers have demanded that Israel show "restraint" and return to the peace table. But nothing surpasses the temerity of Bush's statement on October 2, 2001:
Bush's statement is demonstrably false. The only previous president to endorse a Palestinian state was Bill Clinton, and he only did so at the end of his presidency. Ronald Reagan, for example, rejected it out of hand. Look how far Bush has retreated in such a short period of time. Moreover, the Bush Doctrine, born from the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, provides that terrorists and states that sponsor terrorism are enemies of the civilized world, and that they must be defeated. And as recently as November 6, 2001, Bush said:
Why, then, does Bush demand that Israel not respond to terrorism but, in fact, that it negotiate with terrorists and those who harbor them? Why the double standard for a nation with which, as Bush said, we have a "special relationship?" And there's one other point. President Bush has repeatedly asked Americans to be respectful and tolerant of the Muslim community. He has made clear that we are not at war with Islam, but with terrorists. These are wise and laudable ideals. Yet Bush has been completely silent about anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic comments that have become more rabid since September 11 both here and abroad. I'm sure if he asked, his press office could gather the myriad of published articles proving the point. In any event, here's a small sampling: * The Chicago Sun-Times has reported:
* It has been widely reported that an exhibit at An-Najah University in Nablus reenacted the August 9, 2001, slaughter of innocent people in Israel by a Palestinian suicide bomber at a Sbarro pizzeria, which killed 15, including two Americans. The exhibit included a replica of the restaurant with the Hebrew letters "kosher," a student setting up a fake explosion, and a student dressed as a terrorist with the Koran in one hand and a rifle in the other. * The former Imam of the Islamic Cultural Center of New York, Sheik Muhammad Al-Gamei'a, complaining about the treatment of Muslims in America after September 11, said:
* Salam Al-Marayati, executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, and among the Muslim leaders Bush invited to the White House, said, before the identification of the September 11 hijackers was known:
* When New York City Mayor Rudy Guiliani rejected Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal's $10 million donation after the prince implied that the terrorist attacks were related to U.S. policy in the Middle East, the prince said:
Guiliani rejected the prince's statement as nonsense. * It was recently reported that for 50 years, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in Geneva, and now apparently members of the American Red Cross's board, oppose full federation membership for the Magen David Adom (Israel's Red Cross), because it uses the Red Shield of David as its symbol. Bush's condemnation of racism and bigotry is laudatory, but it's incomplete. It is imperative that he speak out against all voices of hatred, including those aimed at Jews and the Jewish state. President Bush's leadership during these difficult times has been extraordinary. I was, and am, an ardent supporter. But there's a disturbing inconsistency in both the application of his antiterrorism doctrine and his rhetoric of tolerance and compassion. |