Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

The Consequences of Long Wars



Text  



Interesting piece at TNR making the case that long wars have more important consequences than shorter ones (HT: RCP):

What would have happened had the second Iraq war turned out like the first, as the White House apparently expected? Saddam would have been toppled, the Iraqi people would have celebrated, order would have been restored quickly, followed by a speedy exit for British and American troops. Then what? Maybe the rule of Iran-style Shia mullahs, perhaps another brutal Sunni autocrat to take the place of the last one, possibly an endless civil war between the two. Today, there is a real chance of a vastly better result–precisely because the insurgency survived, because it wasn’t quickly defeated. Sunni intransigence needed to be crushed slowly; a quick in-and-out war was not enough to kill the dream of forever tyrannizing Iraqi Kurds and Shia. More important, thousands of senseless murders over the past 32 months have taught Iraqis–Sunni, Shia, and Kurd alike–just how vicious Zarqawi and his allies are. That lesson will have very useful consequences for the long-term health of the region.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review