Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

RE: “All For It”



Text  



Matt Yglesias writes in to clarify:

Sorry, I’m just now reading your comments on my post about farm subsidies, and I’m afraid my writing was a bit unclear. The “he” in “he was all for it” was meant to be George W. Bush, who didn’t seem to have big objections to a bad farm bill when Republicans controlled the congress, not Mr. Levin who I assumed was against the bill, as were most intellectuals and policy people across the spectrum. Apologies for the confusion, I’m going to do a followup post on my blog.

That was certainly very hard to discern from the way his post was written, but this makes sense and does clear it up. Complaint withdrawn.



Text