I’ve been asking why the State Department has not designated the Taliban as a terrorist organization, and why Congress’s authorization for the use of military force supporting the war has not been updated to include the Taliban as part of the enemy, given that defeating the Taliban — a terrorist organization – is the stated rationale for our continuing combat operations in Afghanistan.
The obvious, if cynical, explanation seemed to be that we were planning to negotiate with the Taliban (or, at least, encourage Karzai’s negotiating with the Taliban). It is supposed to be U.S. policy — or, at least, it used to be — that we don’t negotiate with terrorists for to do so would reward and thus encourage their barbaric methods. Formally branding the terrorists as terrorists would thus complicate negotiations with them.
The Hill reports that, according to Sen. John Kerry, “very active” efforts are underway to reach a negotiated settlement with the Taliban.
Most Commented on NRO
Noah Glyn: Breaking: Gay D.C. Superhero Revealed
Comments (92)
Noah Glyn: Ashley Judd: Obama ‘HasAn . . .
Comments (66)
Andrew C. McCarthy: Christie Is Not Oneof . . .
Comments (56)
Katrina Trinko: Romney Behind Obama inThree . . .
Comments (51)
Michael Walsh: Kaffee Klatsch
Comments (50)
Karen Lugo: Coexisting with Sharia
Comments (49)
Veronique de Rugy: Fact-Checking Obama on Spending
Comments (46)
Kevin D. Williamson: Yes, the Party ofCivil . . .
Comments (44)