Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

No, We Do Not Need More Fiscal Stimulus

It’s a line you’re seeing with surprisingly frequent regularity: Ben Bernanke wants more fiscal stimulus. So does Peter Orszag. (Hat tip for these links goes, naturally, to Ezra Klein’s blog.)

Advocates of incessant temporary infusions of cash into the pockets of low- to middle-income people in the hopes that they will go out and spend it and “spur demand” and thus create incentives for businesses to invest and expand and hire sound, to be quite frank about it, totally out of their minds. How many times must they be reminded that businesses invest (and banks lend) with an eye toward long-term economic prospects, asking themselves, “What kind of return am I going to get on this investment over the long run?” Temporary blips on the demand radar of the kind that fiscal stimulus represents do not factor into this decision-making process at all.

The thinking undergirding the assertion that fiscal stimulus is what we need is built on the assumption that there exists some tipping point at which an economic recovery becomes self-sustaining and stimulus is no longer needed. Maybe that is true in certain contexts. But it is clearly not true in this one. What is increasingly clear instead is that businesses are not investing for two reasons:

1. They see no improvement in the debt overhang that is keeping consumers from returning to the kind of overleveraged consumption that fueled the mid-2000s boom, and that’s probably a good thing, but we need to find some middle ground; and

2. They have no confidence in the ability of the American political system to fix its long-term budget problems without massive tax increases that would hit them and their customers incredibly hard.

We can have a long discussion about what the government could and should be doing to better address item 1, whether that be enacting the kind of bankruptcy reform many Democrats have been pushing or simply removing the policies that have kept housing prices from reaching market-clearing levels, as I would prefer. But without getting into that, let me just say that it seems pretty clear that more fiscal stimulus, particularly in the amounts that many liberals are talking about, would make item 2 much worse, because it would worsen the deficit picture from the spending side and increase the amount by which taxes will have to rise to pay down the debt. That tipping point will perpetually elude the stimulators for the same reason the carrot will perpetually elude the donkey. So please, please, enough of this already.

Keynesians, you had your turn at bat. You whiffed. It’s time to try something else.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   3

EXPAND  

 Eric
   10/29/10 13:57

You are assuming that we are merely facing short-term blips on the radar. But I don't think businesses assume that. They don't see the necessary stimulus coming in the short term OR the long term.

They see a continued downward spiral, where consumers don't spend because businesses aren't creating jobs, but businesses aren't creating jobs because consumers don't spend. Absent necessary action, there is no reason why this couldn't last for many years if not more, and businesses see that.

Your proposition that businesses don't consider the short term at all is also wrong (many small businesses can't afford to solely think about the long run). But even if we took that assumption as correct for the sake of argument, it doesn't provide any evidence against more stimulus at all (for the above reasons).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/29/10 14:17

Stolen from an anonymous blogger:

"Focusing on government spending to stimulate the economy is like borrowing breath to blow into a dead beast's lungs. The lungs will expand, and the beast will exhale. But what we need is for the beast to breathe again on its own. Until we have national policies that encourage that, Social Security going crappers is the least of our problems."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/29/10 14:49

The most remarkable thing is that this Keynesian "stimulus" spending has been tried repeatedly, here and around the world, and has never worked. Yet, they keep coming back with the same policy.

After all, "this time will be different," of course.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact