In the course of my Marrakech-ing — the final installment of my journal appears on Monday — I took note of the continuing controversy over NPR, PBS, funding, and so on. Just a few remarks:
1) I have long said, Why should a liberal republic such as ours have government radio or government television? Really.
2) I very much favor Radio Martí, VOA, RFE, that thing we have in Iran — American broadcasts to people who otherwise would have nothing but lying state media.
3) In previous periods, when conservatives tried to do something about NPR and PBS, the other side trotted out Big Bird. They literally trotted him out: had some guy in a Big Bird costume, saying, “The Republicans are trying to kill me,” or something. And the point was: We didn’t give a rip about Sesame Street. That show was popular enough to survive on CBS or some other commercial network. We cared about Frontline, NOVA (it was all caps, right?) — things like that. Shows that consistently took a Sandinista point of view.
4) The Left often says that the amount of public funding for these things is trivial — 2 percent or whatever. Fine. So can’t they easily do without it? Why not just get rid of the trivial amount of public funding, so that people like me will shut up? Why not make Nina Totenberg an honest woman? Let her be another lefty in the general market, instead of some kind of official commentator. Our tax dollars don’t go to Michael Moore. Why to her?
5) Some on the left have said, “You conservatives are whining about the firing of Juan Williams. Don’t you guys think that employers ought to be able to hire and fire as they please?” I suppose. But NPR didn’t say, “We’re firing Juan Williams because we think he’s a louse. We think he’s no good. And it’s our right.” No, they fired him on some sort of bogus ethics charge — he had “crossed a line,” etc., etc. He was too impure for spotless NPR. What baloney.
That’s the beauty of being free of public funding: Become Pacifica Radio or something, and do whatever the heck you want. If you want certain views, but not other views, fine. We here on the right aren’t in favor of the “Fairness” Doctrine or other such restrictions. But — to say it for the millionth time — do it on your own dime.
6) “What about Firing Line?!?!” comes the cry. Oh, I think WFB answered that amply (and repeatedly). (One of the arguments: “If we’re to have public television, shouldn’t there be at least one conservative voice, instead of none?” Also: “The billionaire accepts Social Security. And that may appear weird. But you wrote the rules . . .”)
7) Curious — isn’t it? — that conservatives are the main ones defending Juan Williams, a liberal, as far as I know.
8) It was all right for Daniel Schorr to be an NPR guy? Really? Daniel Schorr? He and Totenberg qualify for NPR, but Juan Williams is de trop? Such strange times, chillen. When politically possible, defund the thing, and be done with it. I think everyone will be happier: including liberals.
2) I very much favor Radio Martí, VOA, RFE, that thing we have in Iran — American broadcasts to people who otherwise would have nothing but lying state media.
That's odd - liberal hysterics make the same argument in favor of NPR to combat the evil Fox network, whom they see as Rove's brainwashing device.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseUnfortunately, tax dollars in Michigan have gone to Michael Moore, to help produce a movie that decries corporate welfare of all things.
External Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseUnfortunately, tax dollars in Michigan have gone to Michael Moore, to help produce a movie that decries corporate welfare of all things.
External Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Juan Williams, a liberal, as far as I know."
Curious that conservatives are the main ones defending him *and* that Fox snapped him up with a multi-million dollar contract.
It could be that Juan Williams is a genuine liberal (not just as far as you know, but in reality) and Fox is looking for a genuine liberal because Fox is genuinely fair and balanced, and conservatives are responding the way they are because conservatives are eager to hear the liberal progressive world view being expounded on Fox by a genuine and unabashed liberal, because they find nothing more invigorating than to subject their most cherished beliefs to vigorous and insightful challenges from opposing points of view.
Or there may be less curious explanations for Fox's interest in Williams, and less curious explanations for why conservatives are the main ones cheering about the whole thing.
But, not as far as you know.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Chillen", Jay? Really?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think the best solution is make the liberals be consistent.
What do they do with political ads? They force the advertizers to state at the end, "I'm X and I approve this message," and force the contributor to identify itself.
Republicans should demand that in order for an entity to receive government funds like NPR, it shall place a message at the beginning and end of every program such as this: "NPR is funded by the federal government with your taxpayer dollars, either in whole or in part. The views expressed in this program do not necessarily reflect the views or values of American taxpayers."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe money Sesame Street makes ALONE could replace all federal funding for Public TV and radio.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse