Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah will likely become the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee early next year. From that perch, he’ll oversee the GOP’s tax-writing policy in the upper chamber. Before then, however, Hatch is keeping busy: In coming weeks, he will be one of the leading figures in the battle over extending Bush-era tax rates, which are set to expire at the end of the year.
As he looks ahead, Hatch predicts that there could be a “reasonable compromise” with Democrats and the White House. He urges the president to “come in good faith” to the negotiating table, and to “do this straight up and fair, without demagoguery or phony class warfare.” While Hatch would like to see the entire package of tax cuts made permanent, he tells us that he could support a measure that “extends all tax relief for at least the next three to five years.”
“If Democrats decide to play politics, they’ll try to make some tax cuts last longer than others, letting some expire in two or three years,” Hatch cautions. “But Republicans will not fall for that — we should not fall for that.”
Over the weekend, the president told CBS’s 60 Minutes that he’s open to discussing a compromise with Republicans, that “there’s a basis for a conversation.” But in the interview, and in his weekend video address, Obama maintained that he would like to extend only temporarily tax cuts for those who earn more than $200,000 a year, while making tax breaks for middle-class earners permanent — in other words, setting distinct expiration dates for separate tax levels.
Hatch is no fan of that idea. “We need to get this economy moving, and by extending all of the tax cuts, you provide rate reductions for every American. It’s not just tax cuts for the so-called rich — it’s about boosting the men and women who build those small businesses, as well as their employees,” he argues.
How Obama handles the debate will be a “sign of the president’s willingness to do what’s right,” Hatch says. “Is he willing to chuck out his plan to raise taxes on our job creators? If not, and the president gets his way, only middle-class tax relief will stay in place, while the upper tax brackets increase. That will have a direct — and dire — impact on small-business income and the small-business workforce.”
“The small cadre of people in the White House that put the health-care bills together cannot be the ones driving this,” Hatch continues. “I’ve reached out to him in the past two years to work on health care, but our interactions were limited. In this debate, we have to find ways to work together, for the sake of the economy.”
Obama, Hatch advises, “should take a page out of Bill Clinton’s book; he is intelligent enough to do it. He’s a very bright guy, and I think he has it in him to work with Republicans here. Instead of ridiculing or attacking Republicans, calling us the ‘enemy,’ he can move toward a more centrist approach; he can make some headway. If we can find a way to extend all of these tax cuts, it’ll be in the best interests of his administration — a wake-up moment. If he plays games, it could be downhill until 2012.”
“In the end, the president has to realize that these tax cuts are not about the rich: They’re about stopping the uncertainty,” Hatch says. “Taking over the House, especially in the numbers we did, sent a tremendous message. This year’s election was a referendum and a revolt against the big-government, big-taxing agenda. The American people are screaming: Won’t you just stop and listen? Well, we can start by stopping each and every one of these tax hikes, which are set to hit all Americans on January 1.”
For the past two years I've been hearing how "brilliant" Obama is. I think it was Richard Cohen who even used the phrase "shimmering intellect". Am I missing something? Glib, maybe. Slick, definitely. But brilliant?
All I see is affirmative action...in action.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't see any grounds for compromise on this issue. There are both democrats and republicans in favor of extending the Bush tax plan. With small businesses sitting on their hands rather than take on new investments including employees, it's time to make them permanent.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAs a Utah voter, all I can say is that Hatch had better not come across as a "compromiser," or he will suffer the same fate as Bennett.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI have mixed emotions about how reliable Sen. Hatch is as a conservative at this late stage in his career. When he was first elected in 1976 he was fairly solid and you could count on him to stand up for principles. But unhappily he very quickly got caught up in tranferring his identity from that of a Utah attorney to that of a career creature of the Senate. The irony is that when he first defeated Frank Moss in 1976 a key plank in his platform was that Moss had served too long at 18 years and had lost touch with his constituents. Hatch has now served much longer than Moss in the Senate for 33 years. Like many of his collegures his vanity exceeds his ability and now makes him want to be seen in the media as a bipartisan statesman and there is some mischief that lies in that desire. I am glad Hatch does not want to stagger the expiration dates but he needs be very closely watched because he is too easily tempted by flattery from the liberal media to show he is a "staresman" the proof of which the media always measures by how much one rejects the conservative position.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat's gonna make those tax cuts bring back jobs when they didn't when the GOP was in charge of the House, Senate and the Presidency in 2003?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHow come it's only been the rich that have seen their actual incomes rise over the last 10 year?