Sen. Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), Senate Republican Leader, has reversed course on a proposed earmark ban, saying in a floor speech just now that
“. . .on the issue of congressional earmarks, as the leader of my party in the Senate, I have to lead first by example. Nearly every day that the Senate’s been in session for the past two years, I have come down to this spot and said that Democrats are ignoring the wishes of the American people. When it comes to earmarks, I won’t be guilty of the same thing.”
McConnell defended his own previous earmarks, and subtly worked in the point he’s been trying to make along with Senator Inhofe that the earmark fight is largely symbolic. But smartly, he framed his change of heart not as a politically convenient flip-flop, but as a response to the wishes of the American people:
Make no mistake. I know the good that has come from the projects I have helped support throughout my state. I don’t apologize for them. But there is simply no doubt that the abuse of this practice has caused Americans to view it as a symbol of the waste and the out-of-control spending that every Republican in Washington is determined to fight. And unless people like me show the American people that we’re willing to follow through on small or even symbolic things, we risk losing them on our broader efforts to cut spending and rein in government.
That’s why today I am announcing that I will join the Republican Leadership in the House in support of a moratorium on earmarks in the 112th Congress.
McConnell also emphasized unity with House Republicans on the issue, and gave himself some future maneuvering room by closing with a warning to President Obama:
Republican Leaders in the House and Senate are now united on this issue, united in hearing what the voters have been telling us for two years — and acting on it.
This is no small thing. Old habits aren’t easy to break, but sometimes they must be. And now is such a time. With a $14 trillion debt and an administration that talks about cost-cutting, but then sends over a budget that triples the national debt in 10 years and creates a massive new entitlement program, it’s time for some of us in Washington to show in every way possible that we mean what we say about spending.
With Republican leaders in Congress united, the attention now turns to the President. We have said we are willing to give up discretion; now we’ll see how he handles spending decisions. And if the president ends up with total discretion over spending, we will see even more clearly where his priorities lie. We already saw the administration’s priorities in a Stimulus bill that’s become synonymous with wasteful spending, that borrowed nearly $1 trillion for administration earmarks like turtle tunnels, a sidewalk that lead to a ditch, and research on voter perceptions of the bill.
You can read the full remarks here.
Broadly paraphrased:
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"The people who got me elected vapor-locked when they found out they weren't getting 1,000% return on their investment".
"I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference." -R.F.
Or perhaps he and his friends arrived at The Corner, and decided to turn Right...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePrinciples?!
My hope for this Congress is growing...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWell, I guess it is a start. But they miss the point still! It isn't symbolic. It isn't just a drop in the bucket. This is the currency with which they buy each others votes! Earmarks are how they bribe each other within the system. Get rid of the earmarks and you remove the incentive for Congress to vote against the good of the people they are supposed to represent.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHoorah! Smart move by Sen. McConnell. He saw where the winds were blowing and tacked around at the right time. Had he and Sen. Inhofe continued in their opposition to the earmark ban longer and forced an unpleasant public vote, that would leave the party divided at a time when it most needs to be united.
I wish he would have come around sooner, but better late than never, and this was certainly not too late to come around.
Kudos to all who kept the pressure on (especially all the commenters at The Corner who responded to Sen. Inhofe's post on the topic), which helped lead to this result!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think McConnell came to the realization that there is a Rand Paul waiting in the wings in KY who would love to primary him...
However, McConnell made the right point, ie, this is small and symbolic thing to do BUT small steps in the right direction are worth more than all the soaring rhetoric and fake Olympian columns combined!
CHECK, your move Mr. President....
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is a very good start, as long as McConnell doesn't believe he can split the baby. Stay the course, Mitch.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMitch McConnell is a weakling and should be replaced. We have not worked this hard simply to "get along" with the Demoncrats and the Left. We should be willing to make the same amount of "concessions" as they made when they had the power. ZERO! If the old-line Republicans don't start getting some back bone, they'll get fired also.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSince the Congress has the power of the purse, the answer is simple. Don't give the administration blank checks anymore. Set a low ball budget for each division, pass the budgets in small increments instead of the omnibus horribilus obamanations, and do what needs to be done to provide oversight.
In other words to McConnell, DO YOUR JOB! or we can always find someone else to do it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhen Rudy Giuliani became mayor of NYC one of the first things he did was to get rid of the squeegee guys who would prey on commuters as the exited from the bridges and tunnels. It was mostly symbolic yet it was so important to do.
Let's hope this is McConnell's "squeegee moment". It could be a sign of good things to come.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSmall steps like an earmark ban can lead to medium steps which can lead to big steps. Stop spending any hope my grandkids have for a future! Congress, this can be your finest hour!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOK, now the next step is to strip the names off all pork projects from the past (like all those Robert Byrd bridges, roads, buildings) and re-name them using those who have lost their lives while serving in the armed forces. Nothing would be sweeter, and reflect such a strong rejection of the pork process, than to strip the politicians' names off all completed pork projects.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOver50: What a great suggestion!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm from New Mexico. I don't want any earmarks! What the heck good does it do anyone in New Mexico if we get some $75 million wasteful project but, in return, have to pay a pro-rata portion of $5 billion in other projects in other states?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMitch: Get down off your high horse. It's not so much that "the people have spoken" but that the economic realities – realities you should have been well aware of all along – have spoken.
And when tens of billions of dollars are merely "symbolic," it's time to start thinking about retirement and letting a true fiscal conservative compete for your seat.
All this thoughtful melodrama over what ought to be a no-brainer is a bit much. Stop acting like a titled aristocrat and more like an honest and humble public servant.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWeird. I sent a message to Senator McConnell last night to acquiesce to the mandate sent by the American voters on Nov 2nd and eliminate earmarks. If not for money's sake, for symbolism. Today, he announces he is doing just that. Didn't know I had that much power...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI think this is a really smart move, even if technically it's their constitutional responsibility. Leave it in the hands of Obama and he has no wiggle room. Love to hear him claim republicans aren't serious about cutting spending now.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse