Sen. Jeff Sessions is leading the charge against the DREAM Act amnesty in the Senate and has released “Ten Things You Need To Know About S.3827, The DREAM Act.” It’s not online yet, and since it’s long, I’ve included the full text in the jump, but one item I particularly liked was headlined “DHS Is Prohibited From Using the Information Provided By Illegal Aliens Whose DREAM Act Amnesty Applications Are Denied To Initiate Their Removal Proceedings or Investigate or Prosecute Fraud in the Application Process.” Yup, you read that right — information from fraudulent applications (of which there will be many since, as Senator Sessions’ point number 2 notes, the mere act of applying protects you from deportation while your case is being considered) cannot be used by law enforcement in any way. But what’s the big deal about a few fraudulent applications? It’s not like any bad guys would take advantage of something like that. Oops.
Here’s the full text of Senator Sessions’ release:
OBAMA-REID AMNESTY PLAN BACK ON SENATE CALENDAR FOR LAME-DUCK SESSION
BILL WOULD GIVE COLLEGE PREFERENCE TO ILLEGALS OVER CITIZENS
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has placed S.3827, the DREAM Act, on the Legislative Calendar and has indicated he will seek a vote during the lame duck session of Congress.
In addition to immediately putting an estimated 2.1 million illegal aliens (including certain criminal aliens) on a path to citizenship, the DREAM Act will give them access to in-state tuition rates at public universities, federal student loans, and federal work-study programs.
Aliens granted amnesty by the DREAM Act will have the legal right to petition for entry of their family members, including their adult brothers and sisters and the parents who illegally brought or sent them to the United States, once they become naturalized U.S. citizens. In less than a decade, this reality could easily double or triple the more than 2.1 million green cards that will be immediately distributed as a result of the DREAM Act.
Ten Things You Need To Know About S.3827, The DREAM Act
1. The DREAM Act Is NOT Limited to Children, And It Will Be Funded On the Backs Of Hard Working, Law-Abiding Americans
Proponents of the DREAM Act frequently claim the bill offers relief only to illegal alien “kids.” Incredibly, previous versions of the DREAM Act had no age limit at all, so illegal aliens of any age who satisfied the Act’s requirements—not just children—could obtain lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. In response to this criticism, S.3827 includes a requirement that aliens be under the age of 35 on the date of enactment to be eligible for LPR status. Even with this cap, many aliens would be at least 41 years old before obtaining full LPR status under the Act—hardly the “kids” the Act’s advocates keep talking about.
The DREAM Act requires that DHS/USCIS process all DREAM Act applications (applications that would require complex, multi-step adjudication) without being able to increase fees to handle processing. This mandate would require either additional Congressional appropriations, or for USCIS, a primarily fee-funded agency, to raise fees on other types of immigration benefit applications. This would unfairly spread the cost of administering the DREAM Act legalization program among applicants and petitioners who have abided by U.S. laws and force taxpayers to pay for amnesty. Taxpayers would also be on the hook for all Federal benefits the DREAM Act seeks to offer illegal aliens, including student loans and grants.
2. The DREAM Act PROVIDES SAFE HARBOR FOR ANY ALIEN, Including Criminals, From Being Removed or Deported If They Simply Submit An Application
Although DREAM Act proponents claim it will benefit only those who meet certain age, presence, and educational requirements, amazingly the Act protects ANY alien who simply submits an application for status no matter how frivolous. The bill forbids the Secretary of Homeland Security from removing “any alien who has a pending application for conditional status” under the DREAM Act—regardless of age or criminal record—providing a safe harbor for all illegal aliens. This loophole will open the floodgates for applications that could stay pending for many years or be litigated as a delay tactic to prevent the illegal aliens’ removal from the United States. The provision will further erode any chances of ending the rampant illegality and fraud in the existing system.
3. Certain Criminal Aliens Will Be Eligible For Amnesty Under The DREAM Act
Certain categories of criminal aliens will be eligible for the DREAM Act amnesty, including alien gang members and aliens with misdemeanor convictions, even DUIs. The DREAM Act allows illegal aliens guilty of the following offenses to be eligible for amnesty: alien absconders (aliens who failed to attend their removal proceedings), aliens who have engaged in voter fraud or unlawfully voted, aliens who have falsely claimed U.S. citizenship, aliens who have abused their student visas, and aliens who have committed marriage fraud. Additionally, illegal aliens who pose a public health risk, aliens who have been permanently barred from obtaining U.S. citizenship, and aliens who are likely to become a public charge are also eligible.
4. Estimates Suggest That At Least 2.1 Million Illegal Aliens Will Be Eligible For the DREAM Act Amnesty. In Reality, We Have No Idea How Many Illegal Aliens Will Apply
Section 4(d) of the DREAM Act waives all numerical limitations on green cards, and prohibits any numerical limitation on the number of aliens eligible for amnesty under its provisions. The Migration Policy Institute estimates that the DREAM Act will make approximately 2.1 million illegal aliens eligible for amnesty. It is highly likely that the number of illegal aliens receiving amnesty under the DREAM Act will be much higher than the estimated 2.1 million due to fraud and our inherent inability to accurately estimate the illegal alien population. Clearly, the message sent by the DREAM Act will be that if any young person can enter the country illegally, within 5 years, they will be placed on a path to citizenship.
5. Illegal Aliens Will Get In-State Tuition Benefits
The DREAM Act will allow illegal aliens to qualify for in-state tuition, even when it is not being offered to U.S. citizens and legally present aliens living just across state lines. Section 3 of the DREAM Act repeals Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1623) which prohibits giving education benefits to an unlawfully present individual unless that same benefit is offered to all U.S. citizens.
6. The DREAM Act Does Not Require That An Illegal Alien Finish Any Type of Degree (Vocational, Two-Year, or Bachelor’s Degree) As A Condition of Amnesty
DREAM Act supporters would have you believe that the bill is intended to benefit illegal immigrants who have graduated from high school and are on their way to earning college degrees. However, the bill is careful to ensure that illegal alien high school drop-outs will also be put on a pathway to citizenship – they simply have to get a GED and be admitted to “an institution of higher education,” defined by the Higher Education Act of 1965.
Under the Higher Education Act, an “institution of higher education” includes institutions that provide 2-year programs (community colleges) and any “school that provides not less than a 1-year program of training to prepare students for gainful employment” (a vocational school). Within 8 years of the initial grant of status, the alien must prove only that they finished 2 years of a bachelor’s degree program, not that they completed any program or earned any degree.
If the alien is unable to complete 2 years of college but can demonstrate that their removal would result in hardship to themselves or their U.S. citizen or LPR spouse, child, or parent, the education requirement can be waived altogether.
7. The DREAM Act does not require that an illegal alien serve in the military as a condition for amnesty, and There is ALREADY A Legal Process In Place For Illegal Aliens to Obtain U.S. Citizenship Through Military Service
DREAM Act supporters would have you believe that illegal aliens who don’t go to college will earn their citizenship through service in the U.S. Armed Forces. However, the bill does not require aliens to join the U.S. Armed Forces (the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard); instead it requires enlistment in the “uniformed services.” This means that aliens need only go to work for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or Public Health Service for 2 years to get U.S. citizenship. If the alien is unable to complete 2 years in the “uniformed services,” and can demonstrate that their removal would result in hardship to themselves or their U.S. citizen or LPR spouse, child, or parent, the military service requirement can be waived altogether. Such claims will likely engender much litigation and place a huge burden on DHS.
Furthermore, under current law (10 USC § 504), the Secretary of Defense can authorize the enlistment of illegal aliens. Once enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces, under 8 USC § 1440, these illegal aliens can become naturalized citizens through expedited processing, often obtaining U.S. citizenship in six months.
8. Despite Their Current Illegal Status, DREAM Act Aliens Will Be Given All The Rights That Legal Immigrants Receive—Including The Legal Right To Sponsor Their Parents and Extended Family Members For Immigration
Under current federal law, U.S. citizens have the right to immigrate their “immediate relatives” to the U.S. without regard to numerical caps. Similarly, lawful permanent residents can immigrate their spouses and children to the U.S. as long as they retain their status. This means illegal aliens who receive amnesty under the DREAM Act will have the right to immigrate their family members—including the parents who sent for or brought them to the U.S. illegally in the first place—in unlimited numbers as soon as they become U.S. citizens (6 to 8 years after enactment) and are 21 years of age.
Additionally, amnestied aliens who become U.S. citizens will be able to petition for their adult siblings living abroad to immigrate to the U.S., further incentivizing chain migration and potentially illegal entry into the United States (for those who don’t want to wait for the petition process overseas). When an adult brother or sister receives a green card, the family (spouse and children) of the adult sibling receive green cards as well.
9. Current Illegal Aliens Will Get Federal Student Loans, Federal Work Study Programs, and Other Forms of Federal Financial Aid
Section 10 of the DREAM Act allows illegal aliens amnestied under the bill’s provisions to qualify for federal student assistance under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) in the form of federal student loans (Stafford Loans, Perkins Loans, Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loans), federal work-study programs, and other federal education services such as tutoring and counseling.
10. DHS Is Prohibited From Using the Information Provided By Illegal Aliens Whose DREAM Act Amnesty Applications Are Denied To Initiate Their Removal Proceedings or Investigate or Prosecute Fraud in the Application Process
When an illegal alien’s DREAM Act amnesty application is denied, the bill states that the alien will revert to their “previous immigration status,” which is likely illegal or deportable. The bill, however, prohibits using any of the information contained in the amnesty application (name, address, length of illegal presence that the alien admits to, etc) to initiate a removal proceeding or investigate or prosecute fraud in the application process. Thus, it will be extremely hard for DHS to remove aliens who they now know are illegally present in the U.S., because illegal aliens will be able to claim that the legal action is a product of the amnesty application, and DHS will have the nearly impossible task of proving a negative.
Item 5 is already being chased at the state level. This morning's news included the fact that Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick wants modifications to Massachusetts laws such that illegal immigrants are eligible for both in-state tuition and driver's licenses.
Elections have consequences, but that assumes the electorate is informed on the candidate's views. It would have been interesting to see how this statement would have played a month ago.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse2 measly years of college or national service?
i don't like any of this, but given that a college degress is the new high school diploma, the college requirement should be at least a masters degree.
and the national service piece should be military service and the attainment of the rank of E-6, or 3 years of service in a combat arms MOS, or have been wounded in battle.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe DREAM Act's failure to provide for the prosecution of illegal immigrants who commit fraud reminds us that "little" Nikki Diaz (Meg Whitman's former housekeeper) hasn't yet been arrested, prosecuted and/or escorted to the border.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne Thing That Bugged Me About This Press Release:
1. Title Case Is For TITLES, Which Are Usually Four to Five Words Long, and Should Not Be Used For Subheadings in an Outline That are Pretty Much Complete Sentences, Because it Makes Them Very Hard To Read.
Seriously, I see this all the time in political press releases. Why do they do this? If it's a complete sentence, it should be capitalized like regular body text: capital letter at the start of each sentence and for proper nouns, and that's it. Much easier to read, wouldn't you agree?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnyone who believed that the Left could be trusted on this issue, especially when it comes to the military, needs to be scoffed at. I've read blogs from other commentators at other websites who support the DREAM Act because it would increase military enrollment. Never mind that the Left has yet to find religion on supporting the military outside of mouthing platitudes about supporting the soldiers, but there was no way that the government could prove that applicants under DREAM would either serve their required time, and now we find out that if a "hardship" comes along the military and education requirements will be waived altogether. How quickly do you think that having to have these newfound warriors go overseas to fight in a war will constitute a "hardship" for the illegal and they will be granted quick citizenship without having to fight in said war because it will disrupt hardworking families in the states?
Give an inch and a progressive will take 5,000 miles.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAn ultra-liberal, pro-amnesty friend of mine posted on Facebook that he was fasting over lunch for immigration reform. That inspired me to eat a bigger lunch than usual.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe DREAM Act amnesty would be another nightmare for beleaguered and unemployed American workers.
While 22 million Americans who want a full-time job cannot find one, pro-amnesty cheerleaders are making a last-ditch effort to increase competition for jobs by giving millions of work permits to illegal aliens through the DREAM Act,.
Supporters of DREAM continue to mislead the public by talking about a small group of teenaged students who shouldn't be punished for the sins of their parents who supposedly brought them to the U.S. as young children. In actuality, the bill covers at least 2 million illegal aliens up to age 35 even if they came after childhood, and it allows them to petition for their parents to get permanent work permits.
The DREAM Act allows the parents who illegally put their children into this status to be rewarded for their behavior.
And while it adds millions more competitors into the legal U.S. labor force, it does nothing to discourage future millions from entering the U.S. illegally, from putting their children into difficult circumstances, and from harming American workers.
Put Americans to work, support E-Verify.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy don't you go take one of the jobs at which "illegal aliens" toil day in and day out to make the American economy run -- most Americans CHOOSE NOT TO.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne of the most frightening and disastrous points of the DREAM (Nightmare) Act are the gaping loopholes that allows the illegal a free pass (waiver) if completion of a higher education program or military service could case "hardship" to a qualifying relative, like a USC child or spouse. Note that this not the higher standard of extreme or extremely unusual hardship, merely "hardship." What constitutes hardship in lieu of fulfilling the requirements? Preferring to work? A desire to raise a family instead? Or simply that the illegal never had any interest or intention of attending college/military, and would simply like legal status because they feel entitled to the benefit because they are here and don't want to leave? As generous as CIS currently is with dispensing waivers for meeting benefit requirements, this provision is what truly amounts to amnesty, because virtually anything will qualify as "hardship," and in turn, the illegal need do little more than earn a GED to rocket from conditional to permanent "green card" status, thus laying the path to next handsomely rewarding/legalizing the parents who brought them or smuggled them here, along with their extended family.
Don't think that the immigration attorneys won't seize upon that loophole to ensure that the most numbers of illegals qualify for legal status, (or immediately file class-action lawsuits to even further expand the eligibility pool) particularly to ensure that every illegal who simply has no other means to remain in the US legally, can stay. And don't think that the advocacy groups, particularly the litigious ones, won't seize upon this as well, and ensure that CIS reviews and grants such requests for waivers in the most generous fashion for all. The virtual certainly of massive fraud behind the waivers will guarantee that the burden on CIS and the threat of litigation will be so massive, that, just like in the 1986 amnesty, few fraudulent claims will truly be investigated, but likely rubber-stamped; even those that are investigated will be appealed over and over again, until some class-action suit or another eventually allows the ineligible alien or cheat/fraudster to get legal status anyway.
This won't be a bill intended to help, as its advocates so stridently insist, those who want to go serve the country, to college, or join the military, but simply ensure a massive wave of chain migration, and reward an awful lot of illegals who gambled on sneaking into the US with children in tow (or paid smugglers to do it), took advantage of the generosity of the US and its lax immigration controls, and successfully gamed the system to their benefit and to their children's benefit.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse@mcgruff
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat a nice friend you are
Funny how whenever you get down to the fine print on these amnesty bills the open borders proponents reveal themselves to be utterly dishonest in their rhetoric and their intent. Granting waivers to college students who don't get a degree, or requiring USCIS to approve an amnesty application within 24 hours, or barring ICE from using bogus applications to initiate deportation proceedings all reveal it for the scam that it is. When it's all said and done, there is never even a fig leaf of the pretense of enforcement remaining.
This is a hang together or hang separately issue for the GOP. Deviation by even a single senator or congressman should not be tolerated. The GOP has a solid chance at retaking the Senate in 2012, but not if they're backing scams like DREAM; not if they're again seen as soft on illegal immigration. If they will not even stop amnesties like DREAM then they clearly cannot be relied on to do anything pro-active, like increase internal enforcement and secure the borders.
The GOP is clinging to popularity by a fingernail, and the voters are still suspicious of their agenda. They need to reassure middle- and working-class voters that they can be relied upon to do the right thing.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis article is wildly misleading. first of all the DREAM Act would require that applicants not have a criminal background stated in the clause that asks that the applicant have a clean record. Second, UNDOCUMENTED (yes this is the right word, illegal is a very demeaning and inhumane choice) students would not be getting ANY special benefits that citizens don't already receive. they will be offered in-state tuition IN THE STATE they reside not the whole country. Citizens ALREADY receive in-state tuition from the state they were born in! Yes they won't be able to receive in-state tuition in a separate state but GUESS WHAT they already have an attainable college education in their own state. Without the DREAM Act students in some states have NO OPTION for an affordable education. The whole DREAM Act debate comes down to a question of morals and values. Undocumented children were brought to the U.S. without their consent. The only way they would be able to undo this "wrongdoing" imposed on them is to have returned to their native country when they turn 18 which they have not been to in more than 18 years. Consider that. How can you expect to someone to go to a country they have no family in, know nothing about and ask them to acculturate to the new country. They've established a home in the U.S. already. Please think of this before automatically running to the conclusion others have from the previous comments on this article! Support the DREAM Act.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis article is wildly misleading. first of all the DREAM Act would require that applicants not have a criminal background stated in the clause that asks that the applicant have a clean record. Second, UNDOCUMENTED (yes this is the right word, illegal is a very demeaning and inhumane choice) students would not be getting ANY special benefits that citizens don't already receive. they will be offered in-state tuition IN THE STATE they reside not the whole country. Citizens ALREADY receive in-state tuition from the state they were born in! Yes they won't be able to receive in-state tuition in a separate state but GUESS WHAT they already have an attainable college education in their own state. Without the DREAM Act students in some states have NO OPTION for an affordable education. The whole DREAM Act debate comes down to a question of morals and values. Undocumented children were brought to the U.S. without their consent. The only way they would be able to undo this "wrongdoing" imposed on them is to have returned to their native country when they turn 18 which they have not been to in more than 18 years. Consider that. How can you expect to someone to go to a country they have no family in, know nothing about and ask them to acculturate to the new country. They've established a home in the U.S. already. Please think of this before automatically running to the conclusion others have from the previous comments on this article! Support the DREAM Act.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNational Review editors, please do not delete any comments that are in opposition to the arguments of this article. Not only would it be incredibly biased but it would jeopardize your integrity as a reputable source as a knowledge distributing center. The National Review should provide the views from different sides of the spectrum. As a respectable news outlet I know that the editors will represent the National review in the most professional of manners.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt's nice to know that at least one elected representative, in this case Senator Jeff Sessions, didn't have to PASS a bill before finding out what was IN it! Here the case for opposition is clearly laid out, using very provisions of the bill itself. Illegal aliens hate it when you debate a measure using the FACTS...it gets in the way of their sob stories!
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse1. The DREAM Act promises to dramatically increase the pool of highly qualified recruits for the U.S. Armed Forces.
The DREAM Act is recommended in the 2010-12 Strategy Plan for the Defense Department’s Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to help the military “Shape and maintain a mission-ready All Volunteer Force.”
David S. C. Chu, Bush Administration Under Secretary, Personnel and Readiness, Department of Defense said, “many of these young people may wish to join the military, and have the attributes needed - education, aptitude, fitness, and moral qualifications. In fact, many are High School Diploma Graduates, and may have fluent language skills -- both in English and their native language. Provisions of S. 2611, such as the DREAM Act, would provide these young people the opportunity of serving the United States in uniform.” [1]
There is a strong tradition of military service in immigrant families, but the lack of immigration status prevents many who wish to serve from enlisting. According to Margaret Stock, Lieutenant Colonel (ret.), Military Police Corps, US Army Reserve and Associate Professor of Law, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY – The DREAM Act “would allow military recruiters to enlist this highly qualified cohort of young people, and enactment of the DREAM Act would be a ‘win-win’ scenario for the Department of Defense and the United States. Deporting these young people … deprives the United States of a valuable human asset that can be put to work in the Global War on Terrorism.” [2]
2. The DREAM Act is supported by 70 percent of likely voters and by leaders in education, the military, business and religious orders.
A national poll of 1,008 adults, conducted by Opinion Research Corporation for First Focus in June 2010, shows that support cuts across regional and party lines with 70 percent overall support, 60% support from Republicans and 80% support from Democrats.
University presidents and educational associations, as well as military recruiters, business and religious leaders have called on Congress to pass the DREAM Act.
3. The DREAM Act is a great return on money we have already invested and will prepare the country for the global economy.
The students who would benefit under the DREAM Act have been raised and educated in the U.S. State and local taxpayers have already invested in the education of these children in elementary and secondary school. America deserves a return on their investment.
Today’s global economy requires an educated and skilled workforce capable of acquiring, creating, and distributing knowledge. Passage of the DREAM Act will mean a group of talented, multi-lingual and multi-cultural workers will help America compete with innovators throughout the world.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) “estimates that many of the occupations that will be most in demand in years to come will rely on highly educated workers. Of the 15 occupations projected to grow at least twice as fast as the national average (13 percent), 10 require an associate degree or higher.” For this reason “it is imperative to develop policies …to help these talented students gain access to postsecondary educational opportunities and the workforce as legal residents.” [3]
Leading businesses such as Microsoft have endorsed the DREAM Act because they recognize that our broken immigration system is draining our economy of the talent and resources needed to compete in the global economy.
4. Passage of the DREAM Act will reduce high school dropout rates and enable more students to attend college.
Foreign-born students represent a significant and growing percentage of the current student population. Unfortunately, immigration status and the associated barriers to higher education contribute to a higher-than-average high dropout rate, which costs taxpayers and the economy billions of dollars each year. The DREAM Act would eliminate these barriers for many students, and the DREAM Act’s high school graduation requirement would provide a powerful incentive for students who might otherwise drop out to stay in school and graduate.
5. Passage of the DREAM Act will increases revenues in our communities.
Enabling 800,000 immigrant students access to higher education would go a long way in inspiring other immigrant youth to strive for a college education. This will help boost the number of high skilled American-raised workers. As they take their place in the workplace as hard working, taxpaying Americans, they will contribute a lifetime of revenues at the local, state and federal level.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWell the good news about the DREAM ACT is that if Omana is found out to be NOT a American born citizen which I pray they do a investigation on him next year, that ALL his bills that were passed will become voided and pulled back,
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuseobama is doing this bill hoping to win a 2nd tearm with all the illegals backing him up from the DREAM ACT if it should pass, it's again part of the new world order,
As I see it we are losing our freedom slowly to a man sitting in the White House that NO one even knows about him as he's spending hard working tax payers money hidding himself and laying out the plat form for the new word order,
But unless the Repubcans that will take office Jan 2011 do there jobs and pull a big investigaion on congress and obama as well as the house that permitted the actions and fine/prove that obama to be illegal , We have a chance to bring back the full conititution .
I'd like to know what poll came up with 70% approval for a back door amnesty bill. Maybe the question should have been worded, "Do you agree that foreign-born children of illegal immigrants should have access to in-state tuition and compete with US citizens for Federal and state education grants?" Like the bills Congress doesn't read, once you learn what's in this DREAM act, it's pretty hard to stomach.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnd an army of foreigners defending the US? Get real.
There may be some argument for giving amnesty to aliens who entered at a tender age, say before the age of seven, but why do we never see an argument for the benefit to the alien's country of nativity if that well-educated alien returned?
The major failure of this law is that it allows family members of the beneficiarie so immigrate and the maximum age of 35 is excessive.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse