From Monday night’s Fox News All-Stars.
On the revelation that North Korea has an advanced uranium enrichment facility:
I think this is the final demonstration of the uselessness and the futility of our negotiations with Pyongyang. The farce began 16 years ago when the Clinton administration concluded what was called the framework agreement in which the deal was they would freeze and then dismantle their plutonium program in return for all kinds of goodies, including two nuclear reactors that we would construct, and a lot of, a lot of economic support.
The problem is that there are two ways you can develop a bomb, plutonium or uranium. We assumed all they had was plutonium. Then in 2002, our negotiator in Pyongyang was told that they had a separate uranium program. They then denied it over and over again after that one instance. So we had no idea.
And now we discover they have, as you said, an advanced facility, thousands of these machines that look quite modern. This is not something that was done overnight. So they had a parallel program while they pretended under the Clinton and the Bush administrations to be dismantling or at least holding back on the plutonium program, which means they were not stopping at all on their development of nukes.
I think we will reflexively return to negotiations. The reason all this is revealed is because what they want is another farcical deal in which this program is supposedly restrained in return for a lot of economic aid. Their economy is worse off than it ever was and they are now in a succession crisis.
The problem is everything they say, everything they sign is not worth the paper it’s written on. …
I think we have to completely redirect the policy. It’s not to aim at the leadership in [North] Korea. It’s to aim at the leadership in China. We heard earlier in the show that the Pentagon is considering a request by the South Koreans for tactical American nuclear weapons … We ought to go one step beyond that, to offer South Korea its own nuclear program and to encourage the Japanese to arm themselves if they need to. The way to say it is: All our [Six-Party] negotiations including China — with China — have not succeeded. You’re going to have to arm yourselves and develop a deterrent.
That will get the attention of the Chinese. Up until now the Chinese have played a double game. They have no interest in helping us on the [North Korea] issue. They like having it as a thorn in our side. It’s distracting us as China expands its influence in all of Asia.
What we ought to say is: What they’re worried about is a Japan with nukes or a South Korea with nukes. Let them [the Chinese] imagine that will be the outcome of this double game — and they will begin to act. They control what happens in Pyongyang. All the fuel, all the food comes through China and they could turn it off.
"I think this is the final demonstration of the uselessness and the futility of our negotiations with Pyongyang."
I only wish. Sadly, I have no faith in either party the we will have the "final demonstration of the uselessness of negotiations" until a mushroom cloud rises over an American city.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo nukes for South Korea and none for North Korea? Hey, I know there's a difference between the two governments in terms of stability, etc. But do we really want to advocate the spread of nuclear weapons, generally speaking?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"But do we really want to advocate the spread of nuclear weapons, generally speaking?"
It's pretty hard to make purchases without "coin".
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWe always hear that even in very belligerent and isolated nations (e.g. Iran) we have at least some kind of backdoor communications at some level. Is it possible that we don't really have something similar with the Norks through our South Korean friends?
What I'm getting at is, can't we just get the coup going already?
I realize the fallout would be a big deal. The refugee situation could be epic. But isn't the world just delaying the inevitable? There's going to be a refugee situation at some point. Wouldn't it be better if the West (and China) was able to prepare for it first, then push the button to topple this perpetually insane regime?
I'm just sayin'.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"But do we really want to advocate the spread of nuclear weapons, generally speaking?"
Generally speaking, no. But this is a specific, not a general, proposition. If the only countries in the region that have nukes are our enemy and its friend, and if we're not willing to use them ourselves, then I think the answer here is "yes". Dr. K is right; give China and NK something else to worry about other than how to aggravate us.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExcept for the part about "then they will begin to act". No, they won't. China fully supports a nuclear North Korean troublemaker. Yes they'd be mad about South Korean and Japanese nuclear programs. No they won't change anything or give an inch. North Korea is their proxy, and gives them the ability to proliferate and if necessary launch nuclear attacks with plausible distance to shield China from retaliation. They aren't going to give that up for talk (which is cheap), or money (which they have, thanks), or love (which they do not have for anyone else involved). They aren't going to give anything, full stop.
Stop pretending that China is a rational ally in the matter when they are clearly a determined enemy. A quiet and patient enemy, as great powers typically are, but in no way a responsible civilized state.
There are only two ways North Korea loses its nukes. Americans or our allies blow them apart. Or North Korea falls apart and collapses as a state, and is conquered, politically speaking, by South Korea. That's it. All the rest is fantasy and wishful thinking. Engage reality please.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe 1994 agreement, and much of what is going on now, is done with the intent to make the problem fade into the background, not to solve it.
Virtually all of what Obama does is focused on the news cycle. BHO's foreign policy is one beer summit after another: people sit around talking, with no chance in hell of changing anything, but with the appearance of progress for the cameras.
He honestly believes that this is all Presidents really do.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis administration is committed to and hamstrung by its adolescent concept of disarmament. Their approach - appeasement of aggressors and alienation of allies - guarantees that Iran and North Korea will pursue nukes virtually unmolested while Russia and China obtain strategic and tactical nuclear advantages including delivery systems.
No use debating the merits of Dr. K's strategy when it just isn't going to happen. We might still end up with nukes in the hands of Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, et. al. I know I would want my own rather than depend on this administration to protect me.
ULCD - Utter Lack of Credible Deterrent.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse