The Obama Doctrine presumed the U.S. could manage the world via the deft exercise of soft power and — when things got sticky — an occasional assist from the U.N. But the wheels started coming off that cart almost from the start.
The last week has been one of the worst yet for the doctrine. Less than cowed by soft power, the North Koreans revealed they had vast, previously unsuspected nuclear facilities before proceeding to lob shells at South Korea
Under the circumstances, the White House might find the WikiLeaks release of a quarter million documents to be a welcome diversion — an opportunity to focus on the deck chairs while the decks go under.
Why not? WikiLeaks is not the end of the world. Yes, the leaks could well get people killed — the tragic irony of a website that claims its mission is to be as a force for good. [Note to Assange: Can you sleep at night? Really?] Still, WikiLeaks is not likely to reorder the world order.
Nations are not going to stop cooperating because of leaks or, for that matter stop sharing secrets. After all, what choice do they have? Nations cooperate with the United States not because they like Obama and his doctrine but because it is in their interest to do so. Leaks are not going to stop nations from acting in their self interest.
And after all what can the U.S. do? The WikiLeaks are like an evil genie, once out, the documents can’t be forced back in the bottle.
The administration can, however, do two things to repair the damage wrought by WikiLeaks. First, it can embrace a foreign policy that our adversaries fear and our friends respect. Nobody gets more cooperation than a winner. For starters, the president should dump the New START treaty — its one-sidedness makes the U.S. look like a lousy negotiator in the eyes of the world… and a patsy in the eyes of the Russians. He should also reject out of hand calls to gut the defense budget and just flat out declare that America will stick it out in Iraq and Afghanistan until the job is done. And while he’s at it, he could stand up to China and stop extending the hand of friendship to regimes interested in a world without freedom or America.
Second, the administration can hunt down any American connected with these leaks, try them for treason, and seek the death penalty. They deserve nothing less. Ordered liberty rejects the notion that any one citizen can jeopardize lives and give away America’s secrets — just because they feel like it.
A vast number of individuals have access to classified materials. The fact that compromises like this happen so rarely is a testimony to the restraint, judgment, and patriotism of those who serve and represent our nation. Their peers who betrayed the public trust betrayed all of them and the rest of us as well.
– James Jay Carafano is director of the Heritage Foundation’s Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies.
Heh you must be kidding right? You don't actually believe that obama cares one bit about what is good for america...or don't you understand that his definition of good for america is quite the opposite of what you and the rest of us might believe?
Why hasn't anyone wondered if it isn't the Obama admin itself that is releasing these documents? Is it because you bought into the lie. That obama never heard the traitorous ramblings of Rev Wright?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseFWIW: This last point is the one that has always puzzled me: Where are these docs coming from and why are we not doing more to prevent them from getting into the reptilian Julian A's (his real name was blocked by your filter: fitting!) hands? The leaky intelligence community got all its attaboys from the media during the Bush administration: no info too sensitive to keep classified. This is the natural result of this fecklessness on the part of the Left and the media.
Now Obama, Man of the Left, is presiding over increasingly serious leaks of now over a million classified and top secret docs. He has no moral authority, nor does he have the moral fortitude, to do what is right. And the intelligence community has gotten used to leaking as a way of life. Somewhere, somebody has got to take action to prevent the leaks in the first place. Treason convictions and executions would be a great place to start. But, we seldom hear about who is giving these docs to JA. Is it one guy? A hundred? J. A. is a distraction; the source of the docs is the problem.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePardon me for my cynicism but I could believe that the Obama administration is waiting for the proverbial "pony in the pile" to surface.
"Keep searching people. In a pile of 250,000 leaked documents, there just *has* to be something on George Bush in here..."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWe should thank Julian A. for exposing our vunerabilities in peace time. Imagine what our enemies would do in time of war: read our cables in secret and "predict" our every move. Julian is the messenger, the message is our govt is incompetent and corrupt. Do not kill the messenger, do clean up our govt.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIndividuals and news organizations that leaked Wikileaks documents should be prosecuted!
External Link
Questions:
1. Am I the only one who has noticed that WikiLeaks didn’t seem to have access to America’s top secrets until after President Obama’s inauguration?
2. Isn’t it curious that, although this is the third time that WikiLeaks has undermined our nation’s national security by leaking sensitive documents, the Department of Justice has been silent each time until recent and has done little or nothing visible to stop the leaks?
3. Could President Obama and his administration be using the deplorable actions by Wikileaks as part of their Cloward-Piven Strategy in their final push to destroy our country and/or turn it into a one-world government?
“Food For Thought”
“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”
Semper Fi!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMy memory goes back to a time when the USA commanded great respect throughout the world, not because we were universally loved, but because we were respected, and even feared, for how we conducted our affairs internationally and domestically. We had an active, and effective CIA that went about its business safeguarding the Nation's security without much publicity, and often through clandestine operations. Those who would harm us through attempts on our security were dealt with expeditiously, and often with little or no public knowledge of how the matter was handled. With that effective CIA, a Julian Assange might suddenly have been reported as arriving on a plane coming into American Samoa, where he was arrested and placed in custody awaiting trial on charges of treason. There would be no explanation of how he came to be on that plane or how the authorities knew he was arriving, but the result was that he would spend his remaining years in prison. We need to get back to those days.
David W. Keefe
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJake: What is the "Cloward- Piven Startegy?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBill, not to override Jakes remarks, I believe Cloward-Piven works on the principle that you cause all the confusion and overload, so to speak, and then then Big Brother, the government comes to the rescue. It's a bad doctrine and has evil consequences.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMr. Carafano suggests that at times we could ask the U. N. for assistance. Why ask a bunch of people who hate us for advice? We should resign from the U.N. and kick them out of the country.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse