Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

According to WikiLeaks, Israel Was Right

Berlin – Never mind the Fleet Street–style diplomatic chitchat about European leaders; the most interesting thing to come from the latest WikiLeaks round is Arab world leaders’ being forced to come out of the diplomatic closet and declare Iran’s regime the number one enemy in the Middle East.

According to one cable, Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah “frequently exhorted the US to attack Iran to put an end to its nuclear weapons program.” In 2008, the king’s envoy to Washington told Gen. David Petraeus to “cut off the head of the snake” in the Islamic Republic.

While Arab states such as Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE, and Oman have long privately conveyed such warnings to diplomats, they never had the courage to flex their muscles in public. That helps to explain why European policymakers (and corporations seeking to avoid losing major business deals with the radical regime) frequently chalked up Iran’s jingoism to American and Israeli hyperbole. But Iran is a threat not only to the democratic Jewish state but to many of the region’s Arab states as well. The logical corollary: Tehran’s rulers are endangering global security, thus there is a pressing need for an immediate, comprehensive embargo of Iran’s energy and financial sectors.

In the Israeli media, defense analysts are concluding that the leaked comments vindicate Israel’s longstanding position on the need for swift and powerful action against Iran’s out-of-control regime. And the European media? The editors of Der Spiegel are expressing joy at the collapse of American foreign-policy might; Bill Kristol deconstructs their delight here.

Benjamin Weinthal is a fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   3

EXPAND  

vadare
   11/29/10 15:56

What are the chances that Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations were pushing for the US to do something about Iran so that, after we had done what they wanted, they could turn right around and either accuse us of being "cowboys" or (worse yet) blame Israel?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/29/10 22:49

This whole thing is fascinating. If there has been such broad agreement to cut off the head of the Iranian snake, why have we not been able to forge an alliance of Arab states with U.S. backing to force Iran to it's knees or else? The problem is the Arab states unwillingness to act openly in their own best interests for fear of internal radical islamists. Sad that it might end up being Israel who again is forced to act in everyones best interests while being condemned by those whose interests are served. Cowards.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
eagle
   12/02/10 11:51

It's simple -- if Arabs want to go to war with Iran -- let them get their OWN PEOPLE and let them start & finish their OWN WAR.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact