Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

The National Republican Review



Text  



I confess to confusion at the reader comments here about how NR is a GOP flack. I, as one person among many at NR, believe George Bush deserves some credit and a little more respect than a shut-up-and-go-away post. But NR disagreed with the Bush administration on a whole host of issues. (I did, too.)

Republican administrations and officers could tell you all about their frustration with NR on a whole host of issues. Veterans of the Bush White House will not-so-fondly remember NR on faith-based initiatives, on No Child Left Behind, on the Department of Homeland Security, on Harriet Miers, on immigration . . . I could go on. He wasn’t the perfect conservative, but I think we knew that walking in. And I might add that even the perfect conservative wasn’t always perfect: Go back and read old issues of NR from the Reagan administration; we praised him when we believed he was doing what was best; when we believed he was not, we not only criticized and persuaded but, in some cases, led the opposition.

I didn’t agree with everything the man did or said, but I am grateful for legacies like John Roberts and Sam Alito, and he did use his office for good in a way that a President Gore or Kerry never would have. And now he’s carving out a post-presidential way to be effective (primarily through his Institute) and use the voice that having been president affords him. I’m grateful for that and to him. 



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review