In a Facebook note last night, Sarah Palin argued that the federal government should not bailout any state governments. From her note:
When my state ran a surplus because we incentivized businesses, I didn’t spend it on fun and glamorous pet projects for lawmakers – though that would have made me quite popular with the earmark crowd. In fact, I vetoed more excessive spending than any governor in our state’s history, and I used the state’s surplus to bring our financial house in order by paying down our unfunded pension plans that some other governors wanted to ignore. This fiscal prudence didn’t make me popular with the state legislature. In addition to vetoing hundreds of millions of dollars in wasteful spending, I put billions of dollars into savings accounts for future rainy days, much like most American families do in responsibly planning for the future. I also enacted a hiring freeze and brought the education budget under control through a commitment to forward-funding. I returned much of the surplus back to the people (it was their money to start with!) through tax relief and energy rebates. I had proven as the mayor of the fastest growing city in the state that tax cuts incentivize business growth, and though the state legislature overrode some of my veto cuts and thwarted an additional tax relief request of mine, the public was supportive of efforts to rein in its government.
It’s one thing to veto spending and reduce the size of government when your state is broke. I did it when my state was flush with revenue from a surplus – though I had to fight politicians who wanted to spend like there was no tomorrow. It’s not easy to tell people no and make them act fiscally responsible and cut spending when the money is rolling in and your state is only 50 years shy of being a territory and everyone is yelling at you to spend while the money is there to build. My point is, if I could fight this fight in Alaska at a time of surplus, then other governors can and should be able to do the same at a time when their states are facing bankruptcy and postponing this fight is no longer an option.
Read the whole thing here.
Hey, how nice to finally see a position paper from Mitt Romney!
Oh wait,......
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnother great point by Palin. These bailouts are coming, the cost to taxpayers will be huge.
By the way, this is one of the reasons why we love Palin. She was the first major GOP figure to take on ObamaCare, the first to take on QE2, and now the first to take on the coming State Bailouts. She has great political instincts, combined with the fact that she is RIGHT on all the issues.
Where is Romney, Huckabee, Gingrich, Daniels, Thune & Co on this?? ** Crickets **
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThere she goes again, what an inarticulate lightweight, one of her employees probably wrote that (palin "state bailouts" on google = 15k hits).
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt is something to behold that Mrs. Palin is being vilified, at all, on the right. I mean, here she is, right again about another key issue. If she is a dunce, she sure must have quality people around her. If she is how she presents herself, then she is the conservative most of us NRO'sters have dreamed about.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBA in journalism from five different state colleges, they probably just handed her that degree because of her rich daddy.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse