Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Why Sen. Thune Didn’t Withdraw His Earmark Requests

After his caucus passed a voluntary earmark moratorium last month, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R., Utah) — perhaps with the offing of co-delegate Bob Bennett fresh in his mind — did something both politically smart and substantively commendable: he withdrew each of his earmark requests from the omnibus. Brian Buetler has it:

“I did,” Hatch confirmed to me this afternoon after a Senate vote, “because I decided I voted for the moratorium, and I thought ‘well, I need to do that.’”

[. . .]

“People have the right to do whatever they want,” he said. “I just felt my own personal moral obligation to do that.”

What’s putting senators like Thune, Cornyn, and even Republican Leader McConnell in such a tough position on the omnibus is not just that they requested earmarks, but that every earmark in the bill went through the regular committee order. There simply are no surprises in that part of the omnibus, and in many cases senators had months to register protest. Senator Hatch did just that. Why didn’t others?

Thune tells Beutler, simply, that “I guess I hadn’t thought about doing it.” Thune’s office elaborates for me, saying the senator didn’t withdraw his requests (which were made months before the moratorium vote) because he didn’t think the Democrats would have the “audacity” to move on an omnibus in the lame duck. But Thune now says that he will vote to strip out all the earmarks — his included — from the omnibus if given the chance.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   10

EXPAND  

A Private View
   12/15/10 16:48

Thune's an okay mediocre Plains State Republican establishment senator. Looks good, he's tall, he has a pretty wife and daughters (I used to be on their Christmas card list after donating to his senatorial campaigns). But he's out of his league as a possible presidential candidate. Maybe he'll end up as a veep candidate, but that's as far as he should go.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Breakn70
   12/15/10 16:52

Oh, come on you guys. Do we look that stupid to you? And what's even worse is that these two Johns (perfectly named) are a part of OUR leadership! Crikee!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/15/10 17:37

"Thank you for stopping me before I kill again."

Lame, Senator...really, really lame.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/15/10 18:18

More proof the Republican leadership is absolutely pathetic...just another DC Good Ol Boys network, IMO.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/15/10 18:20

Can we now please stop pretending that Senator Ethanol (R-SD) is a contender for 2012 nomination?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Gee
   12/15/10 19:19

Thune is a PIG...and a louse. We see your game, Senator.

Shame...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/15/10 20:29

Yeah, he'll vote to strip them all out, if he gets the chance. And, he just didn't think about all his requested earmarks in the bill. Yeah, right.

He's hoping that he won't get the chance, and he can then say, "Well, I would've, if I could've".

Fail, Senator. Big, fat, fail.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/15/10 23:00

Down goes Frazier, Down goes Thune - it's over before it even starts for the Senator - this guy and anyone else that continues to simply give the taxpayers the middle finger - has no chance and for some reason they can't figure it out - beyond absurd

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/16/10 05:38

My jaw drops when I read about any Republican who can be blindsided by Democrats' audacity. There was this little thing called the Obamacare bill, fellows, remember? And if you want a "chance" to remove the earmarks, how about doing something more dramatic than just a perfunctory "no" vote? Why aren't you people trying to gum up the works every way you can to slow this lame-duck session down so that it runs out of time and momentum. Why did Senator Demint withdraw his request to have the whole START treaty read? If nothing else, that would have bought 12 more hours needed to run the clock out on this monstrosity. Why aren't our Republican Senators not pulling out every procedural maneuver in the book to stop Harry? Why do Republicans never learn, and never acquire a real backbone?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/16/10 17:15

Should be no surprise. The professional politicians we're stuck with will never change. they only represent themselves. 2012 is time to clean house again, Republicans included!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact