Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Welcome to the ‘Cut and Grow Majority’

Washington — In his first press conference in his (nearly official) capacity as majority leader, Rep. Eric Cantor (R., Va.) outlined his vision for the new Republican-led House. “I think you could sum up what our new majority is going to be about by saying it is a ‘cut and grow’ majority,” he said.

Cantor said Republicans efforts over the past two years — dutifully opposing the Democratic agenda and crafting counterproposals of their own — came to fruition in the midterm elections. “Clearly the people of this country spoke out,” he said. “They looked at this agenda that was being promoted by the White House and the [Democratic] majority as far outside the mainstream.” It was a “repudiation of what had gone on in this town,” he said, but “wasn’t necessarily an election about [Republicans].”

With that in mind, Cantor laid out a three-part rule he by which he would seek to abide in the new Congress, which would entail asking every day if the Republican majority’s actions are focused on 1) job creation and economic growth, 2) cutting spending, and 3) shrinking government while protecting and expanding liberty. And if not, to ask, “Why are we doing it?”

The new “results-driven” majority would act quickly to advance its “cut-and-grow playbook” in the next few weeks leading up to President Obama’s State of the Union address on Jan. 25, focusing primarily on reducing government spending — bringing new measures to the floor each week — and doing away with excessive government regulations. “To this day we continue to see the drum beat towards more and more reach by this government and it is impeding job growth and impeding the access to capital for small business,” he said.

Republicans would be closely watching President Obama’s address for areas of possible compromise — on cutting spending, doing away with earmarks, and reforming the tax code. “I expect [him] to put some action behind [his] words,” Cantor said, but added that he was “hopeful” that Republicans and the White House could find some common ground in these key areas.

After the State of the Union, House Republicans would follow Rep. Paul Ryan’s lead in crafting a budget that not only brings spending down to reasonable levels but “encapsulates our vision of how we intend to take this country forward.”

On Republican plans to hold a vote next week to repeal Obamacare, Cantor dismissed accusations that their efforts were a waste of time — since, even if a repeal bill were to somehow pass the Senate (which it won’t), President Obama would swiftly veto the legislation. “The Senate will have to consider its position once the House passes the repeal bill and senators hear from their constituents,” Cantor said.

He also indicated that Republicans would not allow Democrats to add amendments to the proposed two-page bill by an open rule process, and defended that position. “It’s a straightforward document,” Cantor said. “It reflects what most people inside the Beltway and outside the Beltway want.”

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   6

EXPAND  

   01/04/11 17:58

One common-sense way to cut spending is to make all govt paid Uneployment benefits LOANS which need to be paid back in full.

Every $ paid after the employer-paid benefits run out would be structured as Wage Loans not as cash giveaways. These Wage Loans would be like student loans-- there are limits and they are not forgiven through personal bankruptcy. Repayment could begin when the citizen is employed again.

The state and Fed governments cannot afford these open-ended giveaways and this would encourage people to find a job to pay their expenses even if it wasn't the perfect job.

It is simple and easy to understand.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 18:11

My problem with Cantor's formulation is that it cedes an important premise to the Democrats: "Job creation and economic growth" are not the proper goals for the federal government, and almost every attempt by the government to even TRY to promote those goals carries a severe risk of misfiring.

Rather than promising that the GOP is going to use government to promote jobs and economic growth -- a promise which the GOP can no more fulfill than the Dems can -- the GOP should very explicitly devote itself to getting the federal government out of the economy's way. Quit over-taxing and over-regulating, and THE FREE MARKET will then produce jobs and economic growth.

This isn't just semantics. Like our insistence that cutting taxes isn't "putting money into people's pockets," this is every bit as important a premise, and one that we should honor relentlessly.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
BOBinTX
   01/04/11 18:29

Rob, Your proposal is sound but will only force more debt on families in need, perhaps pushing them on to more government assistance.

And to Bill - right on! I don't trust Boohooener or Yes
We Can-tor.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Just Doug
   01/04/11 22:03

Currently over 40% of people who file federal tax returns do not pay any federal income tax at all. Besides not paying any tax at all, most of these people actually get what is called "tax refunds" due to Earned Income Credit & Child Tax Credit. That's not truely a tax refund at all, it's another wellfare program often giving away up to $10,000 per tax filer. That's in addition to all the other wellfare benefits that they recieve during the year, and these numbers continue to inflate. I'm one of the sixty percent that can't afford it anymore, and sure would like to see the issue addressed. Beats cutting national defense.

Source is www.irs.gov "stats & facts"

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/05/11 01:13

RobFromGa

Really terrific idea--never heard of that before. I would add an idea of mine about health care. When basically sound people go to the emergency room and can't afford their treatment, they should have to pay it off through community service.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/05/11 09:53

Let's slash funding for those unelected "Czars" and for the U.N., eliminate funding for NPR and public tv; use unspent "stimulus" money to pay off things in the budget, eliminate the Dept. of Education from which we get no education, the Dept. of Energy from which we get no energy, privatize Social Security and Medicare and make it voluntary - each taxpayer chooses whether he wants to stay in the government system or the privatized one, and do real tax reform with low rates. Eliminate all corporate tax, tax on capital gains, dividends and interest, How's that for openers?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact