GOP leadership has selected House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) to deliver the Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union address next week.
From the statement announcing the selection:
Last year – in an unprecedented failure – Congressional Democrats chose not to pass, or even propose a budget, punting on a duty that represents the most basic responsibility of governing. Chairman Ryan will deliver the Republican address Tuesday night from the House Budget Committee hearing room, where the Democrats’ spending spree will end and the Republicans’ push for a fiscally responsible budget that cuts spending will begin.
A shrewd move. Leadership could have opted for — and many expected them to — a rising star/minority figure like Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), or Govs. Nikki Haley (R., S.C.) and Susana Martinez (R., N.M.). But in choosing a veteran budget hawk like Ryan, Republicans intend to drive home the earnestness of their pledge to rein in federal spending.
More:
Known for his thoughtful and detailed critiques of big-government policies, Ryan has helped put to rest the Democrats’ argument that more government spending and higher taxes is the answer to most of our nation’s ills. His commitment to free enterprise and limited government make him the right choice to outline a vision for how a smaller, less costly government will help create the right conditions for the creation of good, private sector jobs.
“Paul Ryan is uniquely qualified to address the state of our economy and the fiscal challenges that face our country,” said Speaker Boehner. “We’re broke, and decisive action is needed to help our economy get back to creating jobs and end the spending binge in Washington that threatens our children’s future. I’m pleased that Paul will be outlining a common-sense vision for moving our country forward.”
Leader McConnell said, “Paul Ryan has spent the better part of the last two years explaining exactly why the Democrat agenda has been so bad for jobs and the economy, and why we need to ditch the government-driven approach in favor of creative, common-sense solutions that put the American people back in charge. Chairman Ryan’s unique understanding of the fiscal problems we face, his command of policy, and his adherence to the principles of our nation’s founding make him an excellent spokesman for the path that Americans want Washington to take.”
“Delivering an address to the nation is a unique opportunity, and I am grateful to my party’s leaders for entrusting me with this responsibility,” said Ryan. “I am hopeful that the President will work with the new House Majority to cut spending, reform government, and restore the foundations for growth and job creation. More than rhetoric, we need results. I look forward to outlining a vision for a future that fulfills the uniquely American legacy of leaving the next generation with a stronger, more prosperous nation.”
The very fact that we have a "Republican response" to the SOTU is a great reason to get rid of the whole pompous exercise. The president should go back to submitting the SOTU as a written report that actually reports on the state of the nation. Instead we have an address that has become an American version of the Queen's Speech in the UK Parliament - a chance for the president to lay out his partisan political agenda. Given what the SOTU has become it is no wonder that the opposition party feels the need to be given "equal time" in order to prepare an equally partisan response to that agenda. That response should make us question whether we should even be putting on this spectacle in the first place.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseA first class decision.
Not everyone will agree with him, but it will be clear the House Budget Committee is chaired by a grown-up with clear objectives.
The right man for the job.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't want either party to "reign" in federal spending. I wasn't aware that spending led to noble status, except metaphorically. Even "reining" in spending is hardlly enough. That horse needs to be turned completely around and spurred in the opposite direction, posthaste. I sense the evil Macchiavellian hand of the automatic correction monkey.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseA VERY shrewd move. My only concern is in the charisma/"larger than life" department. He is NOWHERE near as bad as Bobby J down in LA, and is actually above average in overall presentation (A+ in details, however). It is important that he really come off as "wowing" as possible. If he can hold his own in that department (I think he can, to a degree) then you will have a truly wonkish and MEATY rebuttal to the President.
Overall, I like the move more then a potential Rubio address simply because there will be more specifics and not generic talking points.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWow! What a terrific choice. Every time I've heard him speak, I'm deeply impressed with his grasp of fiscal policy and the impact of congressional legislation on the rapidly rising national debt. He not only knows the archane details of appropriations bills and legislative proposals, but he also has excellent ideas about how to effectively reform the system. In the televised healthcare summit last year, he virtually silenced Pres. Obama with facts and arguments Obama simply could not refute. Frankly, considering how articulate he is, and mindful of the man of integrity that he conducts himself to be, he'd make a superb presidential nominee in 2012. Anyone care to join the move to draft him?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThey're putting that whole "stupid party" label at risk...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAh yes, Paul Ryan the "veteran budget hawk" who voted yes to TARP, and yes to bailout of automakers (External Link
). But of course, consistency between talk and walk on government spending and budget deficits isn't a requirement for Republican "budget hawks" these days. NRO will sing their praises anyway.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt makes sense to have a member of the House give the speech as thats the Chamber that we control.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNikki Haley just gave top staffers in her administration raises, hard to claim she can relate to the budget.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOne of the very few politician's who don't leave slime on the stage after they leave. He's believable, smart, energetic, and right. If we would have more people like him in control, including the top level, we'd all be way better off.
When is it that we will begin to elect fiscally conservative, and fiscally educated people to public office? Right now, we have a bunch of salemen who are used to padded entertainment allowances.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePaul Ryan has an impressive command of policy, stands for fiscally conservative principles and is the rare conservative politician who can articulate those principles. Excellent choice and the GOP should be getting men like Ryan who are the future on the national stage now.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCurious. You mean Mr. Ryan is human and can makes mistakes? Inconceivable!
I'd be interested to hear what he has to say about TARP and GM now. perhaps someone should ask him?
In your external link you also had high praise for economist and china sycophant extraordinaire Milton Friedman.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat told me everything I needed to know, thank you.
It will be a nice way of capping off the Packer's victory over the Bears. Wisconsin heroes Rodgers/Ryan school Chicago thugs Obama/Urlacher.
Obama picked Bears by 3. One would think he felt he needed Wisconsin's 11 (???) electoral votes in 2012.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI agree with RealityJoe!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe country will FINALLY see Paul Ryan for what he is...
PRESIDENTIAL!
There will be a Republican epiphany on Tuesday night and discover that Paul could win the White House.
I like Paul Ryan quite a bit, and feel the same thing we're all feeling: that Obama is going to be very difficult beat in '12 simply because the people like him on a personal level. This is the upshot of Jay Cost's recent Weekly Standard article discussing the recent bump in Obama's polling numbers:
External Link
"Put simply, America likes the president and wants him to succeed. The fact that he has swung a net of 7-10 points in the public opinion polls based on such minor developments is a strong indication of that."
Further muddying the waters, leading contenders like Ryan and Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels have expressed reluctance about running for President.
There is a way out of this. If Ryan doesn't want the Big Chair, how about Treasury Secretary?
In other words, don't run a GOP candidate against Obama so much as a *GOP Administration* against *the Obama Administration*. Let the public know, early in the race, who might likely staff a Republican Administration. Float those names. This will tend to take pressure off the actual Presidential candidate in the mano a mano against the personally popular, charismatic President. Our side can field a much better Cabinet than their side.
This was part of George W. Bush's success in 2000. The public knew W. had that deep bench behind him.
Follow this road and the GOP will be spared the contortions of trying to dredge up a Superstar. Such contortions might be exactly what would lead us to make a mistake in '12.
When the brain trust at Star Trek determined to create a Next Generation, it didn't make the mistake of trying to cast a Captain who could beat up even more Klingons and score more babes than Jim Kirk. It cast an older, impeccably solid man, and surrounded him with a deep cast that would play an enlarged role.
That show ran for...hmm...eight years.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse