Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani tells National Review Online that he is seriously considering a 2012 presidential run. “I’m like a running back that has the ball and I’m looking for openings,” he says. “A crowded [field] may be good, from my point of view.”
But has America’s Mayor, now 66, learned any lessons from his stalled 2008 campaign? “I sure have,” he chuckles. “You have to win New Hampshire.” That, of course, is a different tune than four years ago, when he placed all of his bets on Florida.
“If you want to talk historically about how people get nominated president — there are probably some exceptions to this — you’ve got to win one of the first two [contests],” Giuliani observes. Come next January, the Granite State, he posits, could enable a moderate frontrunner to emerge, even if they don’t have much momentum coming out of the Iowa caucuses.
“Last time we had split decisions,” Giuliani says. “Huckabee won the first and McCain won the second; Obama won the first and Hillary won the second. That’s normally the case. There’s something about it — New Hampshire seems to vote for somebody other than who won in Iowa.”
A Giuliani ’12 effort would likely emphasize his ideas on domestic policy, which did not get much play in 2008, when his ads often focused on national security. The recent repeal vote against President Obama’s health-care law, Giuliani says, “sets us up for the 2012 election, which I think will be about Obamacare.”
Giuliani argues that Republicans must articulate a clear competing vision on this front in coming months, fighting the Democrats on specifics. On the Hill, he would like to see the GOP push for malpractice reform, interstate purchase of insurance, and tax breaks to incentivize individuals to purchase their own policy. “I’m certainly going to advance this viewpoint,” he says. “And if I think I can be helpful running, I will.”
“When I ran for president, I spent a lot of time on health care, for what was probably an incorrect tactical reason,” Giuliani says, noting his personal interest in the issue. Now, however, he thinks his ’08 health-care platform — which championed the right of the individual to decide — could be a real boost, especially as he mulls jumping into the fray.
Other potential 2012 hopefuls, Giuliani says, will need to be pressed on health care. “Mitt has to explain RomneyCare — that’s going to be a big issue for him.” Moving away from mandates, both state and federal, is crucial, he says.
“That’s the real danger of Obamacare,” Giuliani says. “You’re going to take it from a little state like Massachusetts, where you’re making those decisions for a few million people, and move it to a whole, big office building in Washington to decide what constitutes one’s health insurance.”
If Giuliani runs, it won’t be just as a wonk. As a product of Big Apple politics, don’t expect him to pull punches as he wades back into the national debate. Turning to the Tucson tragedy, for example, he says that Sarah Palin, another potential presidential candidate, did not stumble in her video response to critics.
“I think Palin handled it fine,” Giuliani says. “I think you have a right to defend yourself. I’d get pretty angry if someone accused me of being an accessory to murder. I take my reputation seriously. I think they went over the top in what they did to her.”
Civil debate, he adds, should always be encouraged, but Republicans should not be afraid to speak up about hypocrisy. “Look at [Rep. Steve] Cohen, accusing Republicans of being like Goebbels and Nazis — that didn’t sound too civil. I wonder if he got a call from the president, saying ‘Don’t talk like that, Steve.’”
“The reality is that while the president was telling everyone to be civil, all of his pals were out there trying to blame Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh for the attack,” Giuliani sighs.
"A Giuliani ’12 effort would likely emphasize his ideas on domestic policy, which did not get much play in 2008, when his ads often focused on national security."
Hmm. As I recall, Giuliani tried to play down his ideas on domestic policy last time around for the simple reason that many of them place him on the leftward fringe of the Democratic Party. His anti-gun, pro-partial-birth-abortion, pro-open-borders positions, for instance. I don't see how he's going to finesse these problems this time around either.
There's a reason why a man with oodles of cash (I think only Romney had more money in that primary) managed to win a whopping two (two!) delegates.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGood luck to the Mayor in 2012, but don't expect any suppport from Texas. He angered a large number of his supporters in this state when he pulled out prior to the Texas primary in 2008.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI would like to see Giuliani in a cabinet position or as VP. I think he could be an active Cheney-style VP, or a good AG, SecDef, Natl. Sec. Advsr., or any position that calls for a non-timid, bright executive.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYeah right ... Rudy is part of the left fringe. Tell that to the cops. Simply put - Rudy returned NY to its former glory because he was .. and could be again .. a strong and competent leader. Prove otherwise.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGiuliani would be a true President!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI supported him during the last run and would be thrilled to see him as President. However, if the 08 landscape was bad for him, 12 is worse.
This guy should be the next Republican AG or Sec of State or even VP. Outside of grease ball NY political grudges he has been a complete team player for the GOP. He's always been willing to step up to and even defended Palin during the VP run and after the shooting of Giffords.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Rudy returned NY to its former glory"
I understand that New Yorkers believe that New York is the hub around which the entire universe revolves. I just don't see why they expect everyone else to play along with the fantasy. To be blunt - I'm not remotely interested in NYC's former, current, or future "glory". The place was a left-wing cess-pool before, during, and after Rudy's time in office. The place voted 80% for Obama in 08.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIs this the best we can do? Adulterer-in-Chief. This guy has the morals of a sparrow in heat.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI was ready and eager to vote for Giuliani last time out, but by the time the Michigan primary rolled around, I was left with voting against McCain, for all the good that did. I could see voting for Giuliani, but he needs to display at least a minimal level of campaign competence in 2012.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy would Giuliani believe that he could win the Republican nomination? He is much beloved by all -- for his leadership in reviving NYC; for his leadership on 9/11/01; and for his warm smile, intellect, and engaging personality. All of those facts were true in 2008 and he got nowhere with the primary electorate. We love him, we just don't agree with him on the critical life issues. Of course, other candidates have mouthed the pro-life rhetoric necessary to get nominated; but that doesn't mean that they meant it. Rudy, at least, is transparent with the electorate (even while he was most certainly not so with his own family). However, we doubt that he would appoint pro-life judges because of the Republican platform requesting it. We politely request that he recognize reality and move on to another venue.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't think he can win. He's too liberal socially and I pray this primary will be about getting the best, most conservative candidate we can. Personally, I hope he doesn't win. If you want to know why, read the two articles related to abortion.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNot a prayer. flenser covered Giuliani's bad domestic positions. Moreover, sad to say, his character is bad in ways where it counts, and his family is a mess.
And why, oh why, couldn't he have had the good grace to take one of the available positions in New York, where he was sorely needed? He was a hero in the aftermath of 9-11, but now it seems he's just in it for himself. Well, he can forget about it; it's not going to happen.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRun Rudy, Run! Palin has to much baggage and the rest is well, not good.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRudy has guts, and is not afraid to speak the truth about threats to our nation.
He's also held what is perhaps the second toughest executive job in the nation: mayor of New York. Someone who can clean up that cesspool (no offense to New Yorkers, but that's what it had become) would likely do well starting to drain the D.C. swamp.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"I understand that New Yorkers believe that New York is the hub around which the entire universe revolves. I just don't see why they expect everyone else to play along with the fantasy. To be blunt - I'm not remotely interested in NYC's former, current, or future "glory". The place was a left-wing cess-pool before, during, and after Rudy's time in office. The place voted 80% for Obama in 08."
So because his constituency was liberal his success as an executive is a moot point? I fail to see your logic.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWant to see Rudy run away?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbusePay Bernie Kerik $1.00 to show up, and take his muzzle off.
As the Islamists continue to ramp up operations over the long haul, having Rudy in the White House could be a considerable advantage for the western world.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDidn't care last time, don't care this.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI live in New York. Rudy was a fantastic leader, a truly inspiring figure during and after 9/11, and the only mayor to take on a completely disfunctional city and, in only two terms, make it safe, make it attractive, make it a world class city. I was completely behind him in 2008. But I think his heart wasn't in it then. I think that he was enjoying his new marriage, making some decent money for the first time, living a semi-normal life and not being a punching bag for every sniffy journalist in NYC. To give all that up to go back into the fray, probably just didn't seem worth it. Now, two plus years later, is he going to be different? He's got to sell himself to a whole different crowd, a crowd that isn't all that taken with New Yorkers. I don't want to underestimate him, but . . .
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm not a Republican, I'm a Limbaugh conservative. I live in NH, I voted for Rudy in the '08 primary, and if the primary were held today I'd vote for him again.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse