Well, like you, maybe, I watched the State of the Union address, and also the Republican response. As I was watching, I jotted notes, which I share with you now. As usual with these things — major addresses, presidential debates — I have read no commentary before launching my own. What others think, I don’t know. I’ll get to them sometime later.
1) I didn’t think I’d see Bill Daley again, in public life. Last time I saw him, it was in a men’s room at Davos. (There’s a weird statement — but true.)
2) Michelle Obama — svelte, glam, smokin’. (I’m still in favor of the ex-Alaska governor who serves s’mores.)
3) On ABC, George Will had a look on his face that said, “I can’t believe I’m sitting here with these bozos.” It was almost a look of contempt . . .
4) Obama seems taller than everybody else, as I guess a president should be.
5) Why won’t Mitch McConnell run for president? As a friend of mine was saying the other night, what has happened to people’s ambition? We used to complain of too much ambition . . .
6) It just kills me that Barbara Boxer is still in the Senate — that Carly didn’t knock her off. Boxer’ll be there as long as Strom . . . She’ll bury us all . . . Thanks, California.
7) Elena Kagan greeted Obama with a look of happy gratitude. As well she might have . . .
8) Will this be a teary night for John Boehner?
9) Amazing, how Joe Biden can flash those choppers . . .
10) The ABC people speak of Obama in almost reverent tones. They did not speak about George W. Bush in those tones. Usually, their voices and mouths were tight. Diane Sawyer: It’s almost as if she’s making love to Obama with her voice.
11) I’m awfully glad Boehner’s sitting in that chair — the speaker’s chair.
12) He’s wearing a pink tie. Does this go with a willingness to show emotion, a softer side of Republicanism? (Incidentally, I know you’ll pardon my switch of tenses.)
13) I like the way Obama asks everyone to take a seat.
14) I love the look that Boehner gives, when people begin to stand for him. A look that says, “No, no, please don’t — come on . . .”
15) I wish Obama would say “different from,” instead of “different than.” But that’s a lost cause . . .
16) Crackerjack speaker, he is. No wonder he got elected, with a record thin enough to be Kleenex.
17) So now he’s talking about jobs and entrepreneurship and growth and whatnot? Now? After Swedenizing the country for two years? (But that’s unfair to Sweden, which has been de-Swedenizing.)
18) It’s nice to see, at last, an American flag not intertwined with the PRC flag . . .
19) Obama is praising the stock market? The “roaring” stock market? I thought Wall Street was evil . . .
20) Obama is praising tax cuts? Who does he think he is, the Wall Street Journal editorial page? National Review?
21) Says Obama, “The steps we’ve taken over the last two years may have broken the back of this recession . . .” Uh-huh. Like the “stimulus” package. Like the nationalization of health care. Right, Barack.
Will the American people believe it, come reelection time?
22) I hate this us-against-the-world stuff. Like we’re in some kind of economic Olympics with other countries. It’s not true. Prosperity, economic vitality, is a shared blessing; it is not zero-sum. We rejoice in others’ success, and we continue to succeed our own bad selves. Small, small, what Obama is saying. I have a feeling he does not comprehend abundance.
America is bigger than envying, or worrying about, other countries. I’m reminded tonight of the 1988 Democratic primaries — when Gephardt and Dukakis and those guys kept talking about the rising sun (Japan), whose heat would melt us all. Cripe.
23) In many sentences, Obama is giving a Republican address. Reaganesque, Kempesque — Chamber of Commerce-y.
24) Obama is hailing our free-enterprise system? Has he recently joined Rotary? What will his friends in academia say? Is he going to maintain this pose through the ’12 election? If so, we — we Republicans — may be done for . . .
25) I like that he talks crisply, and at a good pace — not too slow. Slowness kills many a speech.
26) He keeps talking about individual Americans and their businesses, and their experiences — the brothers in Michigan who have that roofing company and so on. Just like Reagan.
I think 44 learned a lot from 40 . . .
27) The Boehner tan is just a little . . . I don’t know . . . striking . . .
28) Biden spends most of the speech with a weird expression on his face — kind of a downturned smile. His mouth is downturned, as if frowning — and yet he is essentially smiling. Do you know what I mean? Paradoxical, strange . . .
29) Whereas most of us would pronounce the plural of “car” “carz,” Obama says “carss.”
I wonder how he would pronounce “Mars.”
30) I’m reminded of what Harry Reid, the august Majority Leader of the United States Senate, called Kirsten Gillibrand: “the hottest member.” I’ll buy it.
31) I wish the president of the United States would stop telling us what we need to tell our kids. He can parent his own damn kids.
32) So we must begin to treat teachers with respect, must we? Teachers were once accorded the highest degree of respect. That was before they, many of them, started acting like narrow unionists.
33) “Undocumented workers” is a phrase unworthy of a thinker or straight-talker.
34) This whining about other countries, and their success, is just bizarre — from a president of the United States. We should welcome and hail others’ successes. They will not hurt our own. It is all complementary (as a rule).
35) Sometimes, Obama is saying, to America at large, “You slobs just aren’t performing well enough . . .”
36) I find it depressing to see Harry Reid still in the Senate. Even if he might have been perspicacious about Gillibrand.
37) High-speed rail? Of all the Euro-weenie proposals . . .
What’s he going to do next, talk about the quality of baguettes?
38) “Without the patdown” — a lovely line.
39) “Now, I’ve heard rumors that a few of you have some concerns about the new health-care law” — utterly charming. I don’t believe I have ever seen President Obama genuinely charming.
40) “What I’m not willing to do is go back to the days when insurance companies could deny someone coverage because of a pre-existing condition.” Excuse me, but if someone is covered for a pre-existing condition — how is that insurance? What does “insurance” mean?
41) Am I hallucinating, or is Barack Obama lecturing a Congress that is half Republican — practically half Tea Party — about spending?
No, no, no: We lecture you about spending, Mr. President.
42) When Obama talks about soaking the rich — the virtue of it — ABC’s cameras turn to Bernie Sanders, the socialist senator from Vermont. I like that.
43) Obama is mocking the absurdities of government? (E.g., the bureaucracy’s approach to salmon.) Excuse me, but is he running for the Republican presidential nomination? Is this some sort of Reagan centennial nod?
44) He is talking about reinventing government — Gore might be a little resentful . . .
45) “And because the American people deserve to know that special interests aren’t larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in Congress should know this: If a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it.” Allow me to ask again: Is Obama now running for the Republican nomination?
This is positively weird . . .
46) “. . . America’s standing has been restored.” What a self-flattering, ignorant, and disgusting line.
47) So, there are the Levin brothers, sitting together. They’ve been in Congress since . . . what, 1908? Still, their mother must be proud. (Sometimes we have citizen politicians. Sometimes we have politician citizens.)
48) “. . . on the Korean peninsula, we stand with our ally South Korea, and insist that North Korea keep[] its commitment to abandon nuclear weapons.” That’s tellin’ ’em, Barack! We insist.
49) “This March, I will travel to Brazil, Chile, and El Salvador to forge new alliances for progress in the Americas.” Could someone tell this self-flattering so-and-so, who thinks the world began with his presidency, that we have had alliances with those countries for many years? I saw José Napoleón Duarte — does Obama even know who he was? — kiss the American flag, on the White House lawn.
50) “Starting this year, no American will be forbidden from serving the country they love . . .”
More and more, people are saying “forbidden from,” instead of “forbidden to.” (Traditionally, it’s “forbidden to” and “prohibited from.”) Also, that “they,” instead of “he,” stinks.
51) “Of course, some countries don’t have this problem. If the central government wants a railroad, they get a railroad — no matter how many homes are bulldozed. If they don’t want a bad story in the newspaper, it doesn’t get written.” Marvelous, marvelous. Forget the Republican presidential nomination: Is Obama trying to work at National Review?
52) This speech is unbelievably rah-rah-America. If a Republican gave it, the Left would call it jingoistic, ethnocentric, chauvinistic, flag-waving, maybe McCarthyite. But Obama can get away with it.
For ’12, we may be doomed, y’all.
53) I wonder if, privately, it sort of sickens Obama to give a speech like this. Does he find it a necessary evil, to boost his ratings and win reelection? Or does he sort of . . . not mind it, even like it?
54) From here on out — from now until Election Day — it’ll be super-patriotism all the way. Obama will make Curtis LeMay look like a pinko. We wondered whether Obama was as flexible as Clinton. I think Obama may prove silly putty itself.
55) The Republican response? I’ll begin with a language note — a pronunciation note: Paul Ryan says “Wisconsin” like a Wisconsinite, naturally enough. How do they say it? “Wi-scon-sin.” The rest of us say “Wis-con-sin.” There’s a difference, believe me. (I’ve been over this in Impromptus. Readers and I had a fun discussion of the matter a couple of years ago.)
56) It’s odd to look pleasant and smiley when you’re talking about economic calamity.
57) “All of this new government spending was sold as ‘investment’” — an excellent line.
58) Our guy is very strong on facing up to the crisis — “manning up,” Sharron Angle might say. (Remember her? People forget so quickly . . .)
59) “We believe government’s role is both vital and limited” — excellent.
60) This would be a much more effective speech in response to a socialist speech — which Obama did not give.
61) It’s as though someone has told Ryan to smile and look pleasant, come what may. How unfortunate. If you’re talking about dire things, it’s okay to look — you know: a little dire. Above all, it’s okay to look natural.
62) I always feel a little sheepish making this type of criticism of people who have actually gone out and gotten elected. And Ryan: He has risen quite high in our politics (and I hope he rises higher).
63) “Under [the right] approach, the spirit of initiative — not political clout — determines who succeeds” — perfect.
64) Ryan takes what we call, in singing, nose breaths.
65) He has given a rah-rah-America speech — but so has Obama. Tonight had aspects of a Republican primary, I swear.
Oh, I have more to say, a lot more. But 65’s enough, more than. Thanks and see you.
Formerly called the State of the Union, now called the "Statism of the Union"
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Diane Sawyer: It’s almost as if she’s making love to Obama with her voice."
Yuck! I just threw-up in my mouth a little bit.
What always strikes me about the ABC coverage is the presence of George Stephanopoulos ostensibly as a "non-partisan journalist". It's amazing he can make it through his own introduction without a belly-laugh. That's courage, or something.
I'm not sure who Stephanopoulos' equivalent was during the Bush administration - Rove? - whomever it was, I wonder when they'll be joining ABCNews as a "non-partisan journalist".
One encouraging production note on ABC is that they haven't yet replaced Will's insightful and sometimes stinging commentary with the musings of their other "conservative", Elizabeth Haesselback. Maybe they're saving that for sweeps.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"-No American will be forbidden from (sic) serving the country they (sic) love..." Does that sweeping statement include felons, too? That tremor you're feeling is Curtis E. LeMay rolling over...
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRegarding #29
President is pretty good at pronouncing "Mars."
External Link
FF to about the 1:08 mark.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Why won’t Mitch McConnell run for president?"
This is when I stopped reading. Mitch McConnell??? Really???
NRO loves the so called moderates.
Jay, please become a member of the Democrat Party. Your departure will shift both sides to the right.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI see you're a long time reader of Jay Nordlinger, previous poster. That was a very well informed comment.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse>>On ABC, George Will had a look on his face that said, “I can’t believe I’m sitting here with these bozos.” It was almost a look of contempt . . .
This is definitely not breaking news. (grin)
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse>>Yuck! I just threw-up in my mouth a little bit.
Scott, you should get that checked out. It's called "GERD" and it can have serious, long-term consequences. (I have never before seen Diane Sawyer listed among the causes though, although I take your point.)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIn the spirit of quickie, one-line responses....Did anyone else notice that Obama's litany of all the different faiths in the American rainbow was in both wording and delivery a close crib of a speech by Mel Gibson in the film, "We Were Soldiers."
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse>>15) I wish Obama would say “different from,” instead of “different than.” But that’s a lost cause . . .
In consideration of my age and growing awareness that my time remaining on this lowly orb is limited, I resolve to follow Jay's learned lead on this from/than matter BUT not to spend five seconds trying to understand the grammatical rationale.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't think Obama would have minded if Boehner cried when The Great Leader did his little bio. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if he threw that in to prod JB into crying.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI question the underlying motives of everything he says and does.
2012 - Don't worry Jay, it's "just words." He can talk the talk, but he won't walk the walk. And the mood of the country is that they want to see some walking.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Parent" is not a verb.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI have to snicker at this part of the naturally glowing post-SOTUS NYT editorial:
"And we were encouraged that Mr. Obama set national goals in these areas — 85 percent of the nation’s energy should come from clean energy by 2035; 80 percent of Americans should have access to high-speed rail within 25 years; and 98 percent should have access to high-speed wireless within five years..."
What about that shower of statistics? Are they valid or reliable; indeed, do they have any meaning at all other than to support my claim that 94.7% of all statistics cited by politicians are bogus? While the ideas are expensive, they're not really all that grand, except to those who worship central planning and government, ah, investment.
Now he wants to "build a railroad," reminding me of the 1931 hit song, "Brother, can you spare a dime?" Does the administration have the Chinese translation of the lyrics ready?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNit: >>2) Michelle Obama — svelte, glam, smokin’. (I’m still in favor of the ex-Alaska governor who serves s’mores.)
Shouldn't that be Alaska ex-governor?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse) It just kills me that Barbara Boxer is still in the Senate — that Carly didn’t knock her off. Boxer’ll be there as long as Strom . . . She’ll bury us all . . . Thanks, California.
Imagine my pain. We also elected a Dem Governor, Lt. Governor, Controller, Treasurer, AG, Sec of State, Assembly and Senate.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJay, we actually say "Sconsin", unless, of course, we're responding to the SOTU address.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI watched the Angelina Jolie movie Salt last night instead of the SOTU. I do not know which was the more absurd spectacle - engineered Soviet super spy kids infiltrating our institutions of government or Obama pretending to be a fiscally responsible politician who believes in American exceptionalism.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"What about that shower of statistics? Are they valid or reliable; indeed, do they have any meaning at all other than to support my claim that 94.7% of all statistics cited by politicians are bogus?"
94.7 seems a little low.....
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse61) It’s as though someone has told Ryan to smile and look pleasant, come what may. How unfortunate. If you’re talking about dire things, it’s okay to look — you know: a little dire. Above all, it’s okay to look natural.
Speaking to an empty room is always awkward. Invoking Reagan is an unfair comparison, but no politician could speak to a remote audience as well as Reagan.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse