Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Rhetorical, Not Substantive, Centrism

Watching Pres. Barack Obama’s State of the Union address, it was hard not to close one’s eyes and hear the voice of Bill Clinton. The only thing missing was: “The era of big government is over.” Had Obama used those words, he would have had to pay royalties to Dick Morris, who actually wrote the line, and whose participation was hidden at the time from the White House staff by Clinton.

Obama is in the midst of his own Clintonian shift to the middle: extending the Bush tax cuts, replacing Rahm Emanuel with Bill Daley, and replacing virtually his entire economic team. Unlike Clinton, he has made no attempt to hide his outreach to a new crop of outside advisers, including Bill Clinton himself and former Bush campaign adviser Matthew Dowd. It is head-snapping.

The result was a State of the Union speech so filled with cognitive dissonance as to be incoherent. Self-contradiction abounded. We must reform Social Security, Obama declared, but not reduce benefits for future retirees or expose them to the vicissitudes of the stock market. That pretty much removes 80 percent of a potential compromise on entitlement reform from the table. We must reduce government spending — but increase “investments” in education, energy, and infrastructure by tens of billions of dollars. We must finish what we started in Iraq and Afghanistan — but bring all the troops home as soon as possible. That Obama could deliver these words with such apparent conviction is a testament to his political skills, but an indictment of his leadership. His only north star is himself. As one adviser told New York magazine in an unintentionally revealing observation, “He wants to be Barack Obama again.” Which leaves one wondering: Who has he been for the past two years?

We don’t know whether the American people will buy Obama channeling Clinton. Reading the tea leaves of the 2012 elections is speculative at this early juncture. But what Obama doesn’t seem to realize is that Clinton’s move to the middle wasn’t just rhetorical, it was substantive. He signed sweeping welfare reform, signed a budget passed by a Republican Congress that reined in spending and cut taxes, and signed a federal death-penalty statute. If Obama doesn’t back up his words with similar deeds embracing conservative public policy, voters will see his centrist head-fake as political posturing and reward (or more likely punish) him accordingly.

— Ralph Reed, a Republican strategist, is chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   5

EXPAND  

   01/26/11 07:06

The thing about Clinton was that he actually WAS a centrist, or at least ran for election to president as one. Remember the DLC - Democrat Leadership Committee (commission? I guess committee)? They strove to bring the Dems back from the hard left and despite Clinton's personal success I think we'd have to say they failed. But Clinton was one of that number and that was how he got elected and, in fact, I think he was sincere about it.

It was after his election that he floated left, with health care, etc.

It was easy, and not fake, for him to move back to the right.

Let's face it, Obama got elected on a lot of rhetorical fluff and nothing else. In his heart and mind he is a man of the hard left and no matter what he may say or even do over the next two years that is not going to change.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/26/11 08:05

The speech was Alinskyite -- a lie from start to finish, in service of living to do more damage after 2012.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/26/11 08:46

Clinton could have done without the federal death penalty statute.

I'm waiting for Obama to announce that he now wants to remove all bans on private ownership of fully automatic weapons, and now demands mandatory ROTC at all colleges that receive any public funds. Otherwise, who cares if the economy will languish, jobs will be lost, entitlements will be burdensome, and grievous social issues will fester? Watch a portion of conservatives praise his new move to moderate centrism, if he does that.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/26/11 09:29

You know, Barack Obama the empty vessel. Barack Obama, everything to everyone. Barack Obama, change my tune as the wind blows and the tides roll.

To lead is to decide. To decide is to choose. To choose is to disappoint.

To say he wants to be Barack Obama again is to say he wants to get back to glorious emptiness...the impassioned preacher of a soulless gospel. Raise the people to amazing emotional heights, head off to his next speech as they crash back to reality.

Nobody fainted last night, and the most telling applause line was his "promise" to veto earmarks. Tepid.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/26/11 11:08

Not just "tepid" but "vapid" since Boehner will ensure that Obama will not receive any bills with earmarks.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact