Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

El Baradei and the Al Qaqaa Affair

I’d all but forgotten this — but Powerline remembered:

El Baradei achieved his greatest renown in connection with the pre-war weapons inspections in Iraq, which he headed on behalf of the IAEA. One particularly discreditable moment in his tenure, which sheds considerable light on El Baradei, requires a walk down memory lane.

You probably don’t remember the Al Qaqaa affair, but it dominated the last days of the 2004 presidential campaign. In a last-ditch effort to pull out the race, John Kerry and the Democrats fabricated a story that was intended to undermine President Bush’s national-security credentials: They claimed that the U.S. Army had failed to secure 377 tons of explosives at a weapons depot near Baghdad (Al Qaqaa) that subsequently disappeared, presumably into the hands of terrorists. The story turned out to be a lie, and the day after the election it was completely forgotten — having failed to serve its purpose — but in the last week before the election, the liberal media gave it all the play they could. The Washington Post reported on October 27, 2004:

The disappearance of nearly 400 tons of explosives in Iraq dominated the presidential race for a third straight day on Wednesday, as Democratic nominee John F. Kerry accused President Bush of evading responsibility and the Republican said Kerry was making unsubstantiated charges.

Kerry, traveling in Iowa, scrapped plans to talk about domestic policy to accuse Bush of trying to cover up the failure to secure the explosives in Iraq. “This is a growing scandal and the American people deserve a full and honest explanation of how it happened and what the president is going to do about it,” Kerry told supporters in Sioux City. Instead, he said, “we’re seeing this White House dodging and bobbing and weaving . . . just as they’ve done each step of the way in our involvement in Iraq.” …

Bush’s remarks produced a furious response from Democrats. In a conference call arranged by the Kerry campaign, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.) issued an extraordinary rebuke of the administration. Because of missing explosives, “my kid and a lot of other kids might get their ass over there and get blown up by these because of their civilian incompetence,” he said, his voice rising to a shout.

Campaigning in Florida, Kerry’s running mate, Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), kept the emphasis on the missing explosives.

The whole Al Qaqaa issue was a complete fraud; the explosives, if they ever existed, were gone by the time U.S. forces captured the depot. Once the election was over, not a single moment was wasted by anyone, worrying about the “missing” weapons. But here is the point: who started the Al Qaqaa fraud? Mohammed El Baradei. The Democrats’ claim was based on a letter from the IAEA that was leaked. We noted in 2004:

Clifford May at the NRO corner says that the New York Times story on the missing explosives was ginned up by the IAEA to undermine the administration, which wants to deny IAEA head, the anti-American Mohammed El Baradei, a second term. May relies on this message from an unamed government source:

The Iraqi explosives story is a fraud. These weapons were not there when US troops went to this site in 2003. The IAEA and its head, the anti-American Mohammed El Baradei, leaked a false letter on this issue to the media to embarrass the Bush administration. The US is trying to deny El Baradei a second term and we have been on his case for missing the Libyan nuclear weapons program and for weakness on the Iranian nuclear weapons program.

The combination of the Muslim Brotherhood and Mohamed El Baradei in control of Egypt would be deadly indeed.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   4

EXPAND  

   02/01/11 12:03

This does bring back bad memories. Funny how the story just disappears when the Left finds it no longer useful. What about all those American kids Biden railed on about? I guess conveniently forgotten.

The Egyptian mess puts the US in a poor position, like trying to divert the Mississippi with a toothpick. I hope the administration has some contacts in the military and elsewhere that can help push policy in a more positive direction.

Obama seems to have been caught complete off-guard by the events in Egypt, even though Mubarak is 82, after all.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/01/11 12:07

I say bring him on. Several things may happen:

1. He may be revealed for the anti-American Islamist he is. Maybe if he presides over a few stonings they'll take away his Nobel prize(or give him another is probably more likely).

2. When things go poorly he might end up like Mussolini. Whether it's at the hands of his MB friends or a regular mob isn't really relevant. Never good to be the first to follow an authoritarian deposed by an angry mob. See Robespierre.

3. He may just be a standard, unspectacular failure.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Reagan's Soldier
   02/01/11 12:12

ElBaradei should be taken out. Today. He's a clear and present danger to Israel and the United States.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Thomas Sm
   02/05/11 22:31

The author may have a decent basic point regarding the Al Qaqaa affair. However, his readers show themselves to be horrific ignorami. El Baradei is clearly a man paratrooped into Egypt by the WEST to co-opt the opposition to Mubarak (so far unsuccessfully). He lives in Vienna and is great friends with the NGO/Soros/World Economic Forum crowd. In fact, that is probably his connection with the Al Qaqaa affair, as that crowd attempted to put Kerry in office (and succeeded with Obama). It is not anti-Americanism (at least not in the sense free trading, globalist NR means it), but he belongs to a different clique of the ruling class, the Soros globalists rather than the neocon militarists (who are also still globalists but with a cruder style of imperialism).

<>

--We should kill him? The USA is a liberal democratic state, it does not resort to the level of cheap Arab dictators or Islamic fundamentalists..hahahaha

Let us go around the world KILLING politicians to ensure only neocon Zionists with 1% support run 3rd world countries so that anti-Christian ISRAEL can be safe. Brilliant. WWJD?

<>

--I just hate those rich anti-American Islamists in suits who reside in high-end flats in central Vienna and attend the World Economic Forum in Davos! Do you get out much?

So, Putin and Ahmadinejad are bad "dictators" but Mubarak, whose elections are far greater shams, and whose state tortures far more than Russia or Iran, he is great and must be preserved at all costs?! All you idiots care about is Israel, not the interests of the United States of America!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact