Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Reagan@100: What Reagan Would Do Now

The greatest president in the modern era would have turned 100 on February 6. I was in high school when he became the 40th president of the Unites States, and his leadership inspired me to enter public service.

I am thankful for President Reagan’s life; for what he did for our country and our world. He caused us to believe in ourselves again and to believe in the American dream. He loved his country, and he loved the cause of freedom.

He knew then what we know to be true today — that the answer to our problems lies not in the hands of government, but in each of us. He famously said that government wasn’t the answer, government was the problem. He didn’t say it for any other reason except that he meant it. He believed it. And he was right.

President Reagan believed that government had grown too big. He believed that high taxes stifled the economy and American creativity. And he was right about that, too.

He fought for lower tax rates, less government spending, and less red tape and bureaucracy so that our economy would grow — and grow it did!

● When he was elected president, inflation was 11.83 percent. When he left office it was 4.2 percent.

● When he was elected, unemployment was 7.6 percent. When he left office it was 5.5 percent.

● When he was elected, the GDP was $3.126 trillion, when he left office it was $5.1 trillion.

To list only a few of the economic improvements under his watch seems futile. But nonetheless, the world had never seen such an economic boom.

It is easy to see what President Reagan would do right now if he was still with us. He would drastically cut Washington spending so that Americans could keep more of their hard-earned dollars. He once said, “The tax isn’t the tax, spending is the tax.” Amen!

There is no better way to honor President Reagan on what would have been his 100th birthday, than for Washington to implement some of the commonsense reforms he did when he became president.

This is why I have sponsored a bill called the Rising Tide Act of 2011. In it, I call for five tax-reform and spending ideas that will get our economy moving again.

● Reduction of corporate-income-tax rates to 23 percent;

● Repatriation of existing overseas profits of American companies to incent them to invest back in the United States to grow our economy;

● Elimination of the death tax

● Elimination of capital-gains tax; and

● Permanent extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.

These ideas would grow our economy, spur investment, and lower unemployment.

Before us lie two very different paths: the one I just described, which is what President Reagan would have done; and what President Obama described in his State of the Union speech — more government spending, more regulation, and less liberty and freedom for each of us. These policies would “kill the goose that lays the golden eggs,” severing the prosperity that is the basis for our continued growth as country.  

The time is now for the size and reach of our federal government to shrink. A good economy makes everything else possible. President Reagan knew this, and implemented policies to get government out of the way and allow free people and free markets to reign. This is what America needs right now more than ever.

Rep. Tim Scott is a Republican from South Carolina.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   11

EXPAND  

Thor's Goat
   02/04/11 17:36

I really think you and other "conservatives" do a great disservice to the Reagan legacy when you pretend that Reagan never raised taxes, never created debit, never increase the role and size of the Fed Gov. or never negotiated with the evil empire.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Justin D
   02/04/11 17:47

Um. When faced with a massive budget shortfall or other policy problems, Reagan raised taxes. He lowered them greatly in 1981, but then raised corporate taxes in 1986, payroll taxes in 1983, and general taxes in 1982. The middle class paid more in taxes at the end of Reagan's term than at the beginning. And our taxes now are far below what they were at any point during Reagan's two terms.

You can't just remake history to support what you want to support.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/04/11 18:16

That's my representative, in every sense of the word.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Kevin Moriarty
   02/04/11 19:41

Rep. Scott:

Let's not forget that Mr. Reagan initially cut taxes but during the rest of his two terms he increased taxes when faced with the fiscal reality that spending cuts alone don't make for good fiscal policy.

He presided over a significant increase in the federal budget, especially for vast increases in military spending.

His administration violated the will of the people, as expressed through Congress, by illegally funding the Nicaraguan contras by buying arms from Iran, our sworn enemy.

He did a lot of good but like any other president his legacy was mixed.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/04/11 19:43

Wonderful article and hopefully your bill was pass.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/04/11 19:53

"He fought for lower tax rates, less government spending, and less red tape and bureaucracy so that our economy would grow — and grow it did!"

Yes, Mr. Scott, it sure did; U.S. Federal Debt as a percentage of GDP did, yes.

Under a divided Congress in his first term, Reagan signed Congressional spending measures that increased this debt 11.3%. In his second term, half of which Congress was divided, Reagan signed spending measures that increased the federal debt 9.3%.

I know, you aren't going to hear this stuff on Hannity or Limbaugh, they are too busy getting wealth by division, but there it is, on several websites that track historical spending by U.S. presidents.

I chose my source like many do, despite its flaws (as every source has): External Link 

Look, I loved Reagan, Mr. Scott. Compared to Carter, there was no comparison. Reagan gave this country something; I'm not sure what it was, but it was positive. But conservatives are going to have to get off the cloud regarding Reagan by trying to make him something he wasn't. He was, at his very heart, a libertarian. He even said that conservatism's heart was libertarian.

It's the core weakness of conservatives: their ideology has no founding principles; therefore, they have to cull from liberal ones. Reagan knew this; it's time modern conservatives learn it, too.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Tarquin the Meek
   02/04/11 22:32

"It's the core weakness of conservatives: their ideology has no founding principles; therefore, they have to cull from liberal ones. Reagan knew this; it's time modern conservatives learn it, too."

Utter nonsense. The founding principles of modern conservatism are the same as the founding principles of the United States of America: No person, regardless of whether he bears a crown or a degree from Harvard, may deny an American his inalienable rights, especially not merely on grounds that the oppressor is a better-born or better-educated person.

Conservatives oppose attempts to destroy Americans' personal liberty in the guise of infantilizing supervision for our own good, to destroy equality before the law in the name of "social justice", and to control and consume all wealth in the name of social progress.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/05/11 00:57

He would have pulled the troops out of the Middle East!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Keith H
   02/05/11 14:42

"The middle class paid more in taxes at the end of Reagan's term than at the beginning." Justin, this is simply not true.

In 1988, Reagan's last year in office, the "married filing jointly" tax rates, for example, were 15% for the first $29,750 of income and 28% for income above that -- just two simple rates.

In 1980, Carter's last year in office, the "married filing jointly" rates hit 16% for any income above $5500 and rapidly increased from there. Income above $29,900, for example, was taxed at 37%. Rates topped out at 70% for income above $215,400.

Rates for the other filing classifications compare similarly.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
John smith
   02/05/11 15:49

People in the United states will never be happy. We have to realize that in order for us to get back right again. We will have to pay even if we don't want to, things will need to be cut, now the decision as far as what needs to cut, needs to be voice from the people to our representatives. No president was ever perfect they did what they had to do during that time make things right. So guess what people we will have to pay taxes, get over it. Things will get cut, get over it. Lets just do the thing and get it done. So we can bring jobs back here, put america back on the map.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
spider43
   02/05/11 21:52

In trying to develop a complete picture of Reagan's greatness, you seem to have overlooked his performances as an apologist for his lies to America, his leaving the largest debt up to that time, his cutting and running, his attempt to crush unions, his shameful performance when questioned about Iran-contra, his bargains with terrorists, his ode to states' rights in campaign speeches and the meaning inherent in that. Let's look at the whole man, not just the parts that bolster your fond memories.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact