Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Economic and Social Conservatives Agree: Cut Planned Parenthood

When the House of Representatives voted two weeks ago to end federal grants and contracts for Planned Parenthood, it was doing more than merely expressing congressional revulsion against a notorious and scandal-plagued organization. It was deciding that American taxpayers should not be saddled with even more outrageous debt to fund an extraordinarily wealthy nonprofit.

As a consequence, what is now at stake in the funding fight over the nation’s largest abortion business is not just a dispute over social policy. It’s not even just a dispute over an organization that has been a sacred cow for decades. It’s about a whole herd of sacred cows. In fact, it’s about the whole farm: If a new Congress elected on a pledge to halt skyrocketing spending and deficits can’t cut the gold-plated panjandrums at Planned Parenthood, it can’t cut anything.

For economic and social conservatives alike, Rep. Mike Pence’s Planned Parenthood defunding amendment is a defining moment. The facts are so familiar that the emergency they represent can be lost in special interest politics, but they are worth rehearsing one more time. President Obama has added $3 trillion to the federal debt over the past two years. The current fiscal year is nearly halfway gone. When it’s over another $1.6 trillion will be added to the tab our nation is running up for its children and grandchildren.

Sometime in the next few weeks, Congress will vote to raise the debt limit because we have maxed out on the $14 trillion in borrowing that has already been authorized. For the average American family, the federal government has now borrowed more than $100,000 on its behalf, funds it will take generations to pay back. By 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office, annual interest payments alone on the national debt will equal non-defense discretionary spending, making the “Department of Interest Payments” — DIP for short — the second largest in the whole federal behemoth.

Against a mountain of debt like this, backhoes are needed, not teaspoons. If American workers are to have any chance of cutting this mountain down to size without turning over all their earnings in taxes, dozens of federal programs, and even a department or two, must be on the table. No program can be off limits. It’s not just the money, of course, it’s the scope of government that must be rethought. Right now, no corner of American life, from the kind of light bulbs we can buy to the toilets in our houses, has been left alone by our overreaching national government.

For these reasons and more, Planned Parenthood should be at the head of the cut list. To begin with, as Chuck Donovan at the Heritage Foundation has pointed out, Planned Parenthood is awash in net income. From 2002 to 2007, the national organization and its  affiliates took in $388 million more than they spent on programs and services. No doubt the group lost some of that money in the same kinds of investments that disappointed the rest of us, but that has not prevented it from paying its president more than $337,000 in annual salary and tens of thousands more in benefits and allowances.

Across the country, courageous Republican governors are doing the right thing and taking on tough budget fights. They are asking government workers to pay more for their pensions and health-insurance plans. They are laying off public employees, reducing the number of patrol cars and fire crews, and cutting basic services. Leaving Planned Parenthood at the federal trough, under lobbying pressures that are a fraction of what the Left has thrown at conservative state legislators, sends up a white flag of surrender that will signal the beginning of a fiscal rout.

Planned Parenthood is a prime cut for reasons that should matter to conservatives on other grounds. Over the past few years, as the investigative group Live Action has documented, Planned Parenthood has shown it will accept donations offered up on racist grounds. They routinely fail to obey the law on statutory rape reporting. And now we know that their clinics across the country will condone and cooperate with child sex trafficking. We ask again: If a sparkling new Tea Party Congress won’t cut off this bunch, what will it cut?

Mike Pence’s battle is not just another social-issue skirmish. It’s a test of economic and budgetary seriousness. March 18 and a second continuing resolution are looming. Planned Parenthood must be privatized. Economic and social conservatives agree — this one is non-negotiable.

Grover Norquist is president of Americans for Tax Reform. Marjorie Dannenfelser is president of the Susan B. Anthony List.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   9

EXPAND  

   03/07/11 09:33

I'd really like to know how Planned Parenthood, with these kinds of revenues, ever qualified as a nonprofit?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
GoldstenLives
   03/07/11 11:49

Nonprofit status does not mean that a corporation must continually operate such that revenue=outlay, or such that the corporation continually operates in the red. In fact, a well-run nonprofit (regardless of political leaning) should run continually in the black. You'll note the better run conservative nonprofits tend to run in the black.

Nonprofit means, in essence, that there are no shareholders or owners. There is no private individual to whom the corporation's assets belong. I know this is misconstrued frequently, but I'd hate for this talking point to catch on and find that any church or charity that conducts its business well enough to run a surplus is suddenly subject to criticism.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
gary crater
   03/07/11 15:06

Planned Parenthood and it's ilk have a track record. 4 out of 10 live births in America are to unwed mothers. Do you want to keep funding that one? And try for what, 6 of 10?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/07/11 16:26
   03/07/11 18:20

Gary Crater how about Planned Parenthood push their other option - contraception. It is usually 99% effective and if you want 100% effectiveness, try abstinence.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Richard J. Kress Jr.
   03/07/11 21:42

I'm so sick of these progressives/Marxists/socialists/communists or what ever they call themselves these days. Political evisceration, a must!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
M Brady
   03/07/11 22:31

One third of Planned Parenthood's income comes from abortion. One third from government sources. Government is funding their profit margin. PP counts someone as a client every time they pick up their birth control pills. Therefore those clients count 12 times as much as one abortion. They buy the pills for a couple of dollars and get reimbursement from the government for almost ten times that amount, and still undercut the local pharmacies. In addition, I believe they have financial interest in Barr Pharmaceuticals, which supplies the pills.

They are enabling promiscuity by young people and out-of-wedlock conception. Half of pregnancies are unplanned and half of those were to women on contraception. Nationwide, at least one quarter of children conceived are aborted. Planned Parenthood has done little if nothing to stem this tide. In fact, they have contributed to the brainwashing that sustains it. 75% of Black children are born out of wedlock and Black babies make up over 1/3 or our nation's abortions. Planned Parenthood opposes abstinence education and tells young people that they are sexual from birth (no latency period there).

Planned Parenthood operates on an out-of-date ideology - a hangover from the early part of the last century when eugenics raged. Time to dump their approach and get back to re-educating our young people about the need for children to have married parents and for girls to cross their legs and take their power back.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
John Jakubczyk
   03/07/11 22:38

And then there is the question of the missing millions and PP's failure to account to the GAO. See External Link 

Congress should audit Planned Parenthood and if it cannot account for the federal tax dollars, there should be a demand to return it all.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Joel Glidden
   04/09/11 00:02

If Planned Parenthood ends, then the number of babies born out of wedlock is just going to rise. Why should poor people have to give birth to babies that they don't want, but rich people, who can afford an abortion, don't have to? That's classist. I work full time and make about $15,000 a year, and if my wife gets pregnant, we wouldn't be able to afford to raise the child. So what's your answer, we should stop making love? Honestly? Do you want to tell me that to my face?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact