Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

‘No Way Out’ of Debt Trap

This is a depressing but spot on interview with Bill Gross, founder of PIMCO, about our debt situation. He concludes that we should brace ourselves for higher interest rates in the very near future.

How much higher? Under CBO’s baseline, interest rates go from 3.2 percent in 2011 to 5.4 percent in 2021; the president’s budget has roughly the same projections. (This Wall Street Journal chart shows the amount of money that will go to servicing our debt if these assumptions are correct.)

But on February 24, the CBO responded to Rep. Paul Ryan’s request for CBO analysis of three different interest-rate scenarios. These three scenarios are:

1. The rate on 10-year Treasury notes issued in calendar year 2011 would average 3.8 percent (3.5 percent in fiscal year 2011), and it and all other Treasury interest rates would rise in the future to approximately their average levels over the 1991–2000 period.

This means that rates would go from 3.5 percent in 2011 to 6.6 percent in 2021.

2. The rate on 10-year Treasury notes issued in calendar year 2011 would average 3.8 percent (3.5 percent in fiscal year 2011), and it and all other Treasury interest rates would rise in the future to approximately their average levels over the 1981–1990 period.

This means rates would climb to 10.5 percent in 2021.

3. Interest rates would follow a path that is consistent with the average of the10 highest projections shown in the October 2010 and February 2011 releases of Blue Chip Economic Indicators.

This means rates would climb to 6.2 percent in 2021.

The result:

Under all three scenarios, interest costs would be higher than CBO estimated in its January baseline projections (see Table 2). The effects would be minimal for 2011. Between 2012 and 2021, though, interest payments under scenarios 1 and 3 would be about $1.1 trillion and $1.2 trillion higher, respectively, and under scenario 2, interest payments would be $5.4 trillion higher. The cumulative deficit and debt held by the public at the end of the 10-year period would rise by similar amounts. A small portion of the additional interest payments would be offset in most years by larger remittances by the Federal Reserve System on its earnings from holding Treasury securities, which are shown as added revenues in Table 2. The estimates in Table 2 do not account for possible effects on the deficit and debt of other differences in economic conditions that might accompany higher interest rates.

The last sentence is important, because it basically says that these projections, which show an explosion in the amount of money needed to service our debt, underestimate the problem, since any decrease in economic growth resulting from higher interest rates — or any other cause — is not accounted for. Bottom line: This could be really bad.

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   12

EXPAND  

   03/08/11 15:25

What percentage of our national debt is refinanced each year?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/08/11 15:42

But what about the cowboy poets? Won't someone please think of the cowboy poets!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Downer
   03/08/11 15:42

The cowards in congress will do nothing until we become a Greek tragedy, and then do nothing again. Dems propose only a 6.1B cut for the next 7 months out of the 1.6T debt - how tone deaf are they to our financial circumstances? Same for some Reps. We can't rely on our "leaders". We'll be on our own when all comes crashing down.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Downer
   03/08/11 15:45

@Dawg.Thanks for the laugh. I took this article too seriously.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mr. Sandmich
   03/08/11 15:57

The Fed will print money over it until it is so worthless that no one has any interest in belonging to the Federal Union of States any more.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/08/11 16:47

What are you all talking about? We are still in the process of increasing spending! February was last month and an all time record high! HHS needs their 315% budget increase for Obamacare still, IRS agents need to be hired by the thousands as well.

Nothing to see here folks, move along, everything is fine.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/08/11 16:58

@Downer: No, I'm with you. It needs to be taken seriously. But given that Harry Reid is apparently more concerned with cowboy poetry, we can pretty safely say that it's not going to be taken seriously in this Senate. We laugh to keep from crying.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Americus
   03/08/11 17:38

This is our fate. Republican government (small r) will not respond to the crisis until the electorate demands it. However, no ill effects of this situation have been seen yet, so therefore, very little pressure has been brought to bear on the problem. Until the American public fully understands the depths this nation is plumbing, and connects this to the economy in general, nothing will happen.

There is no such thing as a free lunch, and we have been eating in the cafeteria without proper payment for a while now. Oh yes, the bill will come due, despite the arguments over minuscule cuts being politically painful.

To paraphrase Charlie Sheen: The trolls run the government. Duh. Boom. Losing.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/08/11 18:40

Debt service is payment to Americans for something they actually did for the country - lend to it - and that they actually deserve. Entitlement spending is payment to Americans for nothing at all. Guess which one is more irresponsible?

Neither can bankrupt the country, because both are received here as well as spent here. Ideally the government would not be involved in either. But if I had to choose between a government collecting 10% of GDP and paying it out to rich savers, and a government collecting 10% of GDP and paying it out to deadbeats for nothing, I'd take the former every day and twice on Sundays.

Fix the entitlements, and leave debt scaremongering to socialists who think income from capital is illegitimate...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Downer
   03/08/11 18:43

Back @ Dawg. Oh, I still take it seriously. It's that you made me laugh at the right time, just after reading the post.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
R Foreman
   03/08/11 23:26

> any decrease in economic growth resulting from higher interest rates — or any other cause — is not accounted for. Bottom line: This could be really bad.

As we've seen, protests by people who can't afford regular meals will shut down all economic activity, indefinitely, and that hurts GDP growth.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Dan Ledbetter
   03/09/11 06:53

Veronique says it could get really bad. What kind of bad? Glenn Beck bad? Alex Jones bad? What kind of bad for the average blue collar worker/small business owner living from paycheck to paycheck with a mortgage? What kind of bad should we prepare for? How do you prepare for it?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact