Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Rubio to Oppose Short-Term CR

The House will vote Tuesday on a three-week continuing resolution that would cut federal spending by $6 billion. It is the second short-term resolution proposed by the 112th Congress. And though it is expected to pass the House comfortably, a number of conservative groups have come out against the measure.

Republican freshmen like Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R., Kan.) have said they will vote against it, arguing that a short-term spending bill forestalls a broader debate over meaningful budget reform and deficit reduction, and expressing concern that the pending measure does not contain any of the policy amendments including in the House’s long-term spending bill, H.R. 1, e.g., the defunding of the EPA and Planned Parenthood.

Today, freshman Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) announced that he “will no longer support short-term budget plans.” In a sternly worded press release, Rubio decried the spending debate in Washington as “absurd political theatre.” He slammed Democrats in Congress for failing to pass a budget last year and for refusing to propose meaningful spending cuts in recent weeks, and an “absent” President Obama for his “lack of leadership.”

“All this has led to a very predictable outcome: Washington politicians of both parties scrambling to put together two and three week plans to keep funding the government, while not fundamentally changing the behavior that has gotten us into this mess to begin with,” he said. “Running our government on the fumes of borrowed spending is unacceptable, short-sighted and dangerous. I commend the efforts of House and Senate Republican leaders to deal with this, but I did not come to the U.S. Senate to be part of some absurd political theatre.”

As Congress prepares for another recess next week, Rubio said lawmakers “should feel ashamed if they have to go home again, look their constituents in the eye, and explain why nothing is being done about our debt crisis.” They ought to be focused on a long-term solution for the remainder of the fiscal year so that the “real debate” can begin over how to save entitlements and reign in the skyrocketing federal debt.

“If we deal with these issues seriously and immediately, we can leave our children with a country better than the one we grew up in,” he said. “If we don’t, we will be the first Americans to leave our children worse off than ourselves.”

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   7

EXPAND  

John Darke
   03/14/11 11:36

Senator Rubio is demonstrating leadership skills so lacking in this Administration, this Senate and this House. Because these spineless politicians chose to ignore the real problems facing our children and grandchildren, and because they prey on the mindless followers of their socialistic agenda (anything to stay elected), they can sleep at night knowing that their electorate will vote them into another term because they (the electorate) are living off of the Government entitlements paid for by our children and grandchildren.

God bless Rubio and the other Conservatives dedicated to provide the adult leadership necessary to right this ship of state.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 Dave
   03/14/11 11:45

I'm a huge fan of Rubio, but he (and others such as the likewise impressive Rand Paul) are fighting on the wrong hill. Every ounce of political capital the GOP spends on the FY11 CR debate is capital they won't have for the INFINITELY more important FY12 budget debate. We all expect Rep. Ryan to come out with a markedly different FY12 budget proposal, one that will make the pitiful cuts to the FY11 CR seem minor (because they ARE minor).

If every FY11 CR passed between now and the end of the year involves a few billion in cuts each time, I'm all for doing those CRs-- and then focusing the major efforts on the FY12 budget (which by the time of passage will be right in the wheelhouse of the 2012 primary season-- thus politically more useful to the debate against the Obama Administration).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/14/11 11:54

This is what is meant by "a sausage factory."

No matter who prevails at this go-round, we're infinitely better off than when San Fran Nan was running things as our CEO voted "present."

Courage.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/14/11 12:11

@Dave: I agree on all points. These 2-3 wk CRs are silly on one level, but in a very practical sense they allow the GOP and Democrats to make cuts in small pieces That makes it incredibly hard to demagogue each bill.

Granted, once they run out of Obama's proposed cuts, things will get tougher. But I think it allows the GOP to keeps its powder dry on the big cuts that are needed. If this passes, they'll have been cutting for a couple of months and yet the Republic Endures. Every cut they pass makes it harder for the Democrats to resist more cuts because the Republic Endures.

These CRs are like mini "snow days". Nobody misses the government on a day to day or even a week to week basis. But if you go in there with $500B "Snow-pocalypse" (e.g. Obamacare passage) everyone and anyone can whip up a panic.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/14/11 13:53

The CRs are all about the optics. The House GOP is still petrified of 1995-redux and are doing everything possible to avoid a shutdown that they believe will be blamed on Republicans and turn voters off to the serious work that must occur on the FY12 budget and beyond. I think the House's fears are overblown, but these measures don't hurt the party - eventually Democrats will refuse any further cuts, at which point the GOP looks like the adults (especially if they signal a willingness to meet Senate Dems somewhere below $61 billion total but still closer to that number than the virtual nothing that Democrats have put on the table).

But the point is that this is part of the set up for the next set of discussions - on the remaining FY11 appropriation, the debt-ceiling vote, and the FY12 budget - and give the GOP as many tools as possible for selling their side to the public while mitigating any fallout from a "worst-case scenario".

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/14/11 15:41

Didn't these senatewh-res just go on a vacation? Do they like take one every month now?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/14/11 23:11

When it comes to spending, divide and conquer. If you try to amass a $500B cut, individual groups that don't care about each other band together to fight you. Break it into smaller pieces, and it tough for the "enemy" to achieve enough mass to win. Nobody really is going to fight for cowboy poets. That's why Reid brought it up...trying to get these piddly interest groups up to fight. That's why Big D is also saying they won't go for more CRs.

Reading later Corner news perhaps the "go for the gusto" crowd is winning out. I hope they're right because my saying "I told you so" is going to seem in poor taste.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact